Efficacy of Zoledronic Acid to Prevent Bone Loss Following Denosumab Discontinuation

May 13, 2024 updated by: University of Calgary

Efficacy of a Single Infusion of Zoledronic Acid to Mitigate the Rebound Effect of Rapid Bone Loss Following Denosumab Treatment Discontinuation

This two-year observational, open-label clinical trial will evaluate the efficacy of a once-yearly infusion of zoledronic acid after denosumab discontinuation to maintain tissue mineral density and bone microarchitecture using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) among post-menopausal women with osteoporosis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

As part of an observational study, twenty female osteoporosis patients looking to transition off denosumab therapy will be recruited from the David Hanley Osteoporosis Centre and affiliated primary care physicians in Calgary. The decision to stop denosumab will be made in accordance with standard clinical care and fully separate from the present study. Approximately 6-8 months after the patients' final denosumab injection, patients will receive a single infusion of zoledronic acid (5 mg/100mL) as part of their routine standard of care. The 6-8 month time frame corresponds with the recommended duration between subsequent denosumab injections. Concurrent with zoledronic acid treatment (within one month before or after infusion), patients will visit to the McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health to receive a baseline dual X-ray absorptiometry scan (lumbar spine, lateral vertebral assessment, and hip) and a high-resolution peripheral computed tomography scan (radius and tibia) to quantify areal BMD and volumetric BMD/bone microarchitecture, respectively. They will also complete the MoJo Fracture Risk Questionnaire. Patients will return for repeat scanning and questionnaire administrations to monitor potential changes to bone at 6 and 12 months after baseline. Any fracture events during the 12-month time frame will be logged in consultation with the patients' physician as documented through routine clinical follow-up. Researchers may contact participants to repeat scanning and questionnaire administration at the 24-month time point, if participants agree to this contact within the informed consent.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4Z6
        • University of Calgary, McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study focuses on post-menopausal, osteoporotic females, anticipating or preparing to transition off active denosumab treatment, for which they have received at least 2 prior injections, via a transition to once-yearly infusion of zoledronic acid.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Post-menopausal females with osteoporosis
  • Anticipating or preparing to transition off active denosumab treatment for osteoporosis with the use of a once-yearly infusion of zoledronic acid
  • Received at least 2 injections of denosumab treatment
  • Had a recent test (within 6 months) of serum creatine, calcium and phosphate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any person for whom zoledronic acid would be considered contraindicated
  • Pre-menopausal females
  • Any person with significant chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 50 ml/m2 at time of osteoporosis clinical assessment)
  • Any person with previous adverse reactions or allergy to bisphosphonate therapies
  • Any person with non-corrected hypocalcaemia
  • Any person currently taking, and unable to discontinue the use of, prohibited medications including: ZOMETA, other bisphosphonate therapies, calcitonin, aminoglycosides, loop diuretics and agiogenesis inhibitors
  • Any person with other history, condition, therapy, or uncontrolled intercurrent illness, which could in the opinion of the Qualified Medical Investigator affect compliance with study requirements or which would make the participant unsuitable for this study
  • Any person with simultaneous participation in another interventional clinical study (e.g., Phase 1-3 clinical studies) or treatment with any investigational medicinal product within 30 days prior to screening visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in volumetric Bone Mineral Density (BMD)/bone microarchitecture from baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (within 1-month of infusion) to 6-months and 12-months
High-resolution peripheral computed tomography scan (radius and tibia) will be used to quantify volumetric BMD/bone microarchitecture
Change from Baseline (within 1-month of infusion) to 6-months and 12-months
Change in areal Bone Mineral Density (BMD) from baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (within 1-month of infusion) to 6-months and 12-months
Dual X-ray absorptiometry scan (lumbar spine, lateral vertebral assessment, and hip) will be used to quantify areal BMD
Change from Baseline (within 1-month of infusion) to 6-months and 12-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fractures
Time Frame: 1 year
Any clinically diagnosed fractures will be reported by treating physician
1 year
MoJo Fracture Risk Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 year
An assessment of fracture risk
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optional further assessment of change in volumetric Bone Mineral Density (BMD)/bone microarchitecture from baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 24-months
High-resolution peripheral computed tomography scan (radius and tibia) will be used to quantify volumetric BMD/bone microarchitecture
Change from Baseline to 24-months
Optional further assessment of change in areal Bone Mineral Density (BMD) from baseline
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 24-months
Dual X-ray absorptiometry scan (lumbar spine, lateral vertebral assessment, and hip) will be used to quantify areal BMD
Change from Baseline to 24-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Calgary

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: William Brent Edwards, PhD, University Of Calgary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 13, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REB21-1898

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings