VIsual Pathways Model in Neuro-inflammatory Disorders (VIP-MODEL)

August 19, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

Study of the VIsual Pathways MODEL for a Better Understanding of Neurodegeneration in Inflammatory and Demyelinating Disorders of Central Nervous System

In neuroinflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) such as multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and anti-MOG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD), neuronal degeneration is the consequence of inflammatory and demyelinating lesions in the brain, optic nerve and spinal cord. Both white and grey matter are systematically affected. Lesions of the perivascular spaces containing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and meningeal inflammation seem to play an important role in the pathophysiology of these neuroinflammatory diseases. Currently, the interrelation of all these aspects is not clearly established in the pathophysiology of these diseases. In order to better understand the mechanisms that lead to and underlie the clinical disability of patients with these diseases, we need in vivo study models that allow the in-depth study of the neurodegenerative process and the identification of its causes. In this perspective, we make the hypothesis that the visual pathways model is very relevant to measure neuro-axonal loss and to explore the different mechanisms involved in neurodegeneration during MS and other CNS demyelinating diseases. Researchers have at their disposal many tools that allow them to analyse and quantify the neurodegenerative process in a reproducible and very precise manner from a structural and functional point of view, while taking into account possible vascular involvement (MRI, optical coherence tomography - angiography, etc…).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Recruiting
        • Hop Fontan Chu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting an episode of acute optic neuritis with the objective of better understanding the pathophysiology of CNS inflammatory diseases and identifying prognostic biomarkers in imaging

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Male or female
  • Aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Presenting a clinical picture of optic neuritis for less than 4 weeks, confirmed by neuro-ophthalmological assessment
  • Patient having given written consent to participate in the study
  • Patient with social insurance
  • Patient willing to comply with all study procedures and duration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - history of optic neuritis on the same side as the recent episode for which the patient is being treated
  • history of retinal pathology (retinal detachment, glaucoma, retinopathies, retinal surgery)
  • diabetes
  • chronic alcohol intoxication
  • contraindications to MRI
  • pregnant women
  • persons under protective supervision (ex : guardianship)
  • minors
  • persons deprived of their liberty
  • administrative reasons: inability to receive informed information, inability to participate in the entire study, lack of social security coverage, refusal to sign consent

A history of pre-existing CNS inflammatory demyelinating disease is not a criterion for non-inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
optic neuritis patients
Patients suffering from an acute episode of optic neuritis will be included. There will be only one group of patients prospectively followed-up.
Other: Clinical examen
MRI sequences for research, pupillometry, OCT-angiography, evaluation of visual cognition

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Presence of enhancement of the optic nerve sheath on the axial T1 dixon MRI sequence post gadolinium at the acute phase of optic neuritis.
Time Frame: at inclusion
at inclusion
Low contrast monocular visual acuity (2.5%, LogMAR unit) at distance from acute optic neuritis
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Presence of enhancement of the optic nerve sheath on the axial T1 dixon MRI sequence post gadolinium. Macular GCIPL atrophy will be assessed by the variation of mGCIPL volume between inclusion and the maximal follow-up.
Time Frame: at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up
at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up
Optic nerve lesion length on 3D-DIR sequence. Alteration of retinal microvascularisation between inclusion and the maximal follow-up.
Time Frame: at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up
at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up
Acute alteration of retinal microvascularisation is assessed by the difference of retinal vascular density between inclusion (V0) and one month later (V1).
Time Frame: at inclusion and at 1 months follow-up
at inclusion and at 1 months follow-up
Low contrast monocular visual acuity (2.5%, LogMAR unit) measured at 12 months (V5)
Time Frame: at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up
at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up
Amplitude of the melanopsin-mediated sustained constriction phase in the blue light-induced pupillary response is assessed at 12 months (V5).
Time Frame: at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up
at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up
Optic nerve lesion length assessed at inclusion (V0)
Time Frame: at inclusion
at inclusion
mGCIPL atrophy/retinal vascular alteration are assessed by mGCIPL volume/retinal vessel density difference between inclusion (V0) and at 12 months (V5).
Time Frame: at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up
at inclusion and at 12 months follow-up
Presence of leptomeningeal cerebral enhancement
Time Frame: at inclusion, at 6 months and at 12 months follow-up
at inclusion, at 6 months and at 12 months follow-up
T2 lesions brain and spinal cord volumes
Time Frame: at inclusion, at 6 months and at 12 months follow-up
at inclusion, at 6 months and at 12 months follow-up
Brain grey matter volumes and brain perfusion (3D-ASL)
Time Frame: at inclusion, at 6 months and at 12 months follow-up
at inclusion, at 6 months and at 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Lille

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Olivier OUTTERYCK, MD, University Hospital, Lille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 7, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 7, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 19, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2022_0289
  • 2022-A01483-40 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB number, ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings