Electronic Training of Elderly Depression With Cognitive Impairment

July 15, 2024 updated by: Qinge Zhang, Capital Medical University

Research on Standardized Electronic Cognitive Training Technique in Early Stage of Senile Depression With Cognitive Impairment

late-life depression (LLD) is the most common mental illness in the elderly. Due to the increasing prevalence of population aging, it has become one of the important factors affecting the quality of life of the elderly. 50-70% of elderly patients with depression are accompanied by different degrees of cognitive impairment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Elderly patients with depression with cognitive impairment have a greater risk of dementia conversion, a worse prognosis and a higher recurrence rate. Therefore, it is urgent to provide evidence-based early intervention strategies for geriatric depression with cognitive impairment. At present, domestic and foreign guidelines do not provide clear and effective treatment plans for elderly patients with depression with cognitive impairment, and clinical research and practice also lack evidence-based treatment methods. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), the most commonly used antidepressants, do not significantly improve the cognitive impairment of elderly patients with depression, and may even aggravate the cognitive impairment of elderly patients with depression. The overall efficacy and tolerability of drug therapy in elderly patients with depression and cognitive impairment are poor. Studies have confirmed that Cognitive training can significantly improve the overall Cognitive function and multiple Cognitive domains of healthy elderly people, patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Previous studies have also preliminarily confirmed the cognitive improvement effect of cognitive training on elderly patients with depression, which provides a new idea for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, based on the urgent clinical needs and preliminary work, the development and clinical validation of a set of standardized cognitive training methods suitable for elderly patients with depression and cognitive impairment will be conducive to improve the overall efficacy of elderly patients with depression, improve the prognosis of patients, and save health resources.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
128

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Beijing Anding Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

56 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patients and their family members signed the written informed consent
  2. Age ≥60 years old
  3. Meet the diagnostic criteria for single or recurrent major depressive disorder in the diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-V)
  4. Currently in the acute phase, HAMD-17 total score at baseline ≥ 18 points
  5. There are symptoms of cognitive impairment, Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale, MoCA) <26 points
  6. Education level above primary school.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with history of epilepsy or coronary heart disease or other serious unstable physical diseases
  2. Participated in another intervention clinical study in the past 1 month
  3. The following mental diseases have been or are currently diagnosed by DSM-V: organic mental disorder, Alzheimer's disease, secondary dementia caused by other causes, schizophrenia, schizophrenic affective disorder, bipolar disorder, delusional disorder, undefined mental disease, patients with drug abuse history, including alcohol and active drug abuse in the past 12 months, except nicotine
  4. He has been taking antidepressants, mental retardants and other psychiatric drugs for the past 2 weeks
  5. Severe aphasia, visual and hearing impairment, etc. unable to complete the scale evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor（SSRIs）combined with Electronic cognitive training
SSRIs（Fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram）combined with Electronic cognitive training (60min, once a day)
Drug: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor（SSRIs，Fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram）
Subjects in the intervention group received SSRIs antidepressants combined with Electronic cognitive training based on mobile phone platform for 52 weeks (once a day, 60min each time)
Other Names:
  • Electronic cognitive training
Placebo Comparator: SSRIs antidepressants combined with blank control Electronic training for 52 weeks
SSRIs drug treatment （Fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram）combined with the blank control Electronic training(subjects were allowed to use electronic products to browse the web and watch the news for 1 hours every day)
Drug: Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor（SSRIs，Fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram）
Subjects in the intervention group received SSRIs antidepressants combined with Electronic cognitive training based on mobile phone platform for 52 weeks (once a day, 60min each time)
Other Names:
  • Electronic cognitive training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
At the end of the 12th week of treatment, the change value of ADAS-Cog score of subjects in the two groups compared with baseline
Time Frame: 12 week
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) was developed in the 1980s to assess the level of cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.The score of the scale is about 0-75 points, and the higher the score, the cognitive function decreases significantly
12 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
At each follow-up point, the change value of ADAS cog scale score of subjects in the two groups compared with baseline;
Time Frame: 52week
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) was developed in the 1980s to assess the level of cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.The score of the scale is about 0-75 points, and the higher the score, the cognitive function decreases significantly.
52week
At each follow-up point, the change value of HAMD-17 scale score of subjects in the two groups compared with baseline;
Time Frame: 52week
17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17)， Mild depression: HAMD-17 scores > 7 points, ≤ 17 points; Moderate depression: HAMD 17 scores > 17 points, ≤ 24 points;Severe depression: HAMD 17 scores > 24 points.
52week
At each follow-up point, the change value of HAMA scale score of subjects in the two groups compared with baseline;
Time Frame: 52week
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) is used to assess the anxiety level of patients. The 14 item cutoff value of HAMA is 14 points. The higher the score, the more serious the anxiety level.
52week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Capital Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Qinge Zhang, PhD, Beijing Anding Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Z191100006619061

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings