Vitamin D3 Supplementation in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing CRRT (NephroD)

April 21, 2024 updated by: Tomasz Czarnik, MD PhD, Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Opolu

Efficacy Comparison of Two Doses of Vitamin D3 in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU) are particularly susceptible to vitamin D3 deficiencies. This can be due to the severity of their underlying disease, the type of treatment they are on, malnutrition before and inadequate nutrition during the hospitalisation preceding ICU admission, as well as advanced age. It has also been established that plasma levels of 25(OH)D3 tend to systematically decrease during ICU treatment. Therapeutic interventions administered in ICU settings such as fluid resuscitation or extracorporeal therapies can cause additional vitamin D3 deficiencies. The incidence of deficiency in critically ill patients can reach up to 90%, and even 30% of ICU patients can have undetectable plasma levels. It is impossible to replenish vitamin D3 levels in critically ill patients with traditional enteral and parenteral nutrition treatment regimens, because nutritional products contain too little of the vitamin. Vitamin D3 deficiency in critically ill patients has been associated with acute kidney injury, acute respiratory failure, sepsis, septic shock and increased all-cause ICU mortality. Despite that, assessment of plasma 25(OH)D3 levels is not a routine practice in ICUs. In view of the prevalence of vitamin D3 deficiencies in ICU patients, rapid replenishment of this deficiency with an increased supplementation dose should be considered as a potential means to improve prognosis in this patient population. The current standard therapy is the administration of 500,000 IU of vitamin D3 via the enteral route in ICU patients with severe deficiency (recommended by ESPEN). The NephroD study is meant to help answer the question whether increasing the standard ICU supplementation dose of vitamin D3 by 50% will ensure a more effective replenishment of this vitamin in critically ill patients undergoing CRRT.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
138

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Tomasz Czarnik, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 0048669906333
  • Email: tczarnik@mac.com

Study Locations

  • Poland
      • Krakow, Poland
        • Recruiting
        • 5 Wojskowy Szpital Kliniczny z Polikliniką SP ZOZ
        • Contact:
          • Wojciech Szczeklik, MD, PhD
      • Lublin, Poland
        • Recruiting
        • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 w Lublinie
        • Contact:
          • Pawel Piwowarczyk, MD, PhD
      • Zabrze, Poland, 41-800
        • Recruiting
        • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 Śląski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Katowicach
        • Contact:
          • Szymon Bialka, MD, PhD
    • Opolskie
      • Opole, Opolskie, Poland, 45-401
        • Recruiting
        • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Opolu
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of the following indications for initiation of CRRT with CVVHDF or CVVHF (acc. to KDIGO, Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury):

    • replacement of kidney function in acute kidney injury
    • hyperkalaemia
    • metabolic acidosis
    • pulmonary oedema
    • uraemic complications (bleeding disorder, pericarditis)
    • hypervolaemia
    • support of renal function (volume control, regulation of acid-base and electrolyte status)
  2. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of minimum 5 points at enrolment
  3. Age of >18 years
  4. Plasma 25(OH)D3 levels ≤12.5 ng/ml as measured by the local laboratory of a participating hospital
  5. Properly managed enteral nutrition regardless of dosing

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute or advanced chronic liver failure (estimated on the basis of the clinical picture and biochemical markers: plasma bilirubin, plasma AST and ALT, high plasma AST/ALT ratio, glycaemia, INR)
  2. Hypercalcaemia (total calcium concentration >11 mg/dl)
  3. Any parathyroid disorder
  4. End stage renal disease according to the KDIGO classification
  5. Patients undergoing plasmapheresis, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R)
  6. Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, are not expected to survive 72 hours since enrolment
  7. A history of nephrolithiasis or de novo nephrolithiasis
  8. Patient qualified to a protocol for the avoidance of futile therapy
  9. Pregnancy
  10. Sarcoidosis
  11. Risk of impaired intestinal absorption caused by the critical illness, associated with impaired peristalsis and delayed gastric emptying, constipation, diarrhoea, shock-induced intestinal hypoperfusion, hyperhydration with resulting intestinal oedema following fluid resuscitation, intestinal flora disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Interventional Arm
a single administration of 750,000 IU of vitamin D3 via the enteral route (through a gastric tube) in ICU patients with severe vitamin D3 deficiency (measured plasma 25(OH)D3 levels ≤12.5 ng/ml) undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy with CVVHDF or CVVHF
Drug: Vitamin D3 - 750 000 IU
a single administration of 750,000 IU of vitamin D3
Active Comparator: Control Arm
a single administration of 500,000 IU of vitamin D3 via the enteral route (through a gastric tube) in ICU patients with severe vitamin D3 deficiency (measured plasma 25(OH)D3 levels ≤12.5 ng/ml) undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy with CVVHDF or CVVHF
Drug: Vitamin D3 - 500 000 IU
a single administration of 500,000 IU of vitamin D3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Supplementation
Time Frame: 7 days
To evaluate and compare the effects of two different supplementation doses of vitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) - 500,000 IU or 750,000 IU administered as one enteral dose - on plasma levels of 25(OH)D3 in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy and diagnosed with severe vitamin D3 deficiency
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
To evaluate and compare the effects of two different supplementation doses of vitamin D3 on mortality in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy
90 days
ICU treatment duration
Time Frame: 90 days
To evaluate and compare the effects of two different supplementation doses of vitamin D3 on ICU treatment duration in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy
90 days
SOFA
Time Frame: 90 days
To evaluate and compare the effects of two different supplementation doses of vitamin D3 on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy
90 days
Catecholamines
Time Frame: 90 days
To evaluate and compare the effects of two different supplementation doses of vitamin D3 on the duration of catecholamine administration in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy
90 days
CRRT
Time Frame: 7 days
To evaluate the relationship between the length of CRRT use in hours from the time of study drug administration to the beginning of visit 4 and serum vitamin D3 levels in both study arms
7 days
GRV
Time Frame: 7 days
To assess the relationship between total gastric residual volume (GRV) in millilitres from the time of study drug administration to the date of the beginning of visit 3 and serum vitamin D3 levels in both study arms
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Opolu

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tomasz Czarnik, MD, PhD, Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Opolu

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NephroD_2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings