Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion With Modified Twin-Block Appliance With Clear Plates
Treatment Skeletal Class II Malocclusion With Modified Twin-Block Appliance With Clear Plates VS Traditional Twin Block
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There are two group:
- a group of patients in which participants will be undergo to Modified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates.
- a group of patients in which participants will be undergo to the traditional Twin-Block Appliance.
phase Intervention/treatment Condition or disease
Not applicable Other:
Modified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates.
Other:
Traditional Twin-Block Appliance. Skeletal class II Malocclusion
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Fadi Jnaid
- Phone Number: 988499015
- Email: Drfadijnaid@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Fadi Jnaid
- Email: fadijnaid@hama-univ.edu.sy
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hama, Syria
- Recruiting
- Hama University
-
Contact:
- Fadi Jnaid
- Phone Number: 988499015
- Email: Drfadijnaid@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- - Patients with mixed dentition at age 10.5-13 years.
- The patient has Skeletal class II malocclusion caused by mandibular retraction ANB > 5, 8 mm >O.J> 5 mm, SNB<78, angle (NSAr) ≥ ° 125 and normal placement of the upper jaw.
- The patient is willing to accept treatment with a removable device.
- No previous orthodontic treatment
- the growth model is within the normal or horizontal maxillary opening angle of 30 >MM or angle of 400 > Björk
- patients do not have an upper alveolar dental protrusion.
Exclusion Criteria:
- -Patients with periodontal disease.
- patients with a neuromuscular disorder.
- patients of class I or III of malocclusion.
- Patients with temporomandibular joint disorder.
- Patients with Skeletal open bite.
- Patients with poor oral and gingival health
- the presence of a unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite.
- patients who have upper jaw stenosis and need to be prepared by expansion before functional treatment.
- any patient who does not meet one or more of the Inclusion criteria will be removed from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: : Modified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates.
Clear plates technique A group of patients in which participants will be undergo to clear plates treatment will be applied to the upper and lower arch 17 hours daily Experimental : Modified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates.
|
Clear plates technique A group of patients in which participants will be undergo to clear plates treatment will be applied to the upper and lower arch 17 hours daily
|
|
Experimental: Traditional Twin-Block appliance
Traditional Twin-Block appliance A group of patients in which participants will undergo to the Traditional Twin-Block appliance Treatment, appliances will be applied to the upper and lower arch 17 hours daily
|
Traditional Twin-Block appliance A group of patients in which participants will undergo to the Traditional Twin-Block appliance Treatment, appliances will be applied to the upper and lower arch 17 hours daily
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the SNA angle[
Time Frame: : T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group)
|
This angle the represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
: T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group)
|
|
change in the SNB angle [
Time Frame: : T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group)
|
This angle the represents the position of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
: T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group)
|
|
change in the mandibular length
Time Frame: T0: 1day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group)
|
Amount of distance measured from the Co point to Gn point in the cephalometric analysis.
Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees.
|
T0: 1day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group)
|
|
change in overjet
Time Frame: T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group)
|
Represents The distance between the most anterior point on the lower incisor to the most anterior point on the upper incisor in the cephalometric analysis.
|
T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group)
|
|
change in the vertical position of incisors
Time Frame: : T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group)
|
The vertical distance from the edge of the lower incisor to the mandibular plane.
|
: T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Rabab Alsabbagh,, DDS MSc PhD, Professor of Orthodontics, University of Hama Dental School, Hama, Syria.
- Principal Investigator: ANAS FAKHOURI, Student in Orthodontics, University of Hama Dental School, Hama.
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Clark WJ. The twin block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Jan;93(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90188-6. No abstract available.
- Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):599.e1-12; discussion e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.010.
- Trenouth MJ. Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jan;117(1):54-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70248-4.
- Buschang PH, Stroud J, Alexander RG. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 1994 Feb;16(1):47-52. doi: 10.1093/ejo/16.1.47.
- de Lira Ade L, de Moura WL, Artese F, Bittencourt MA, Nojima LI. Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in treatment of Class II. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;41(3):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
- Jung MH, Yang WS, Nahm DS. Maximum closing force of mentolabial muscles and type of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):72-9. doi: 10.2319/020509-78.1.
- Tulloch JF, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Oct;98(4):340-7. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81491-X.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Hama University -Orthdontic.
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.