Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Pediatric Regimen in Brazil (BRALLA)

May 3, 2025 updated by: Wellington Fernandes, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Pediatric Regimen in Brazil - a Prospective Collaborative Study

In this project, the investigators intend to start a prospective registry for patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative ALL from 16 years old and above in participating centers, provided that all patients will be treated with the same regimen (a pediatric regimen BFM-based incorporating peg-asparaginase). All diagnostic/follow-up (after induction and consolidation blocks) samples will be centrally biobanked at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo. The main goal of this study is to examine whether the implementation of a pediatric protocol under a prospective registry can increase event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of newly diagnosed patients in the participating centers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Notably, pediatric regimens for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have resulted in better long-term outcomes, especially in the Philadelphia-negative counterpart. These regimens are essentially based on higher cumulative doses of asparaginase and the use of less myelotoxic agents, applying allogeneic transplantation only for high-risk ALL subsets. Recent metanalysis encompassing 27 clinical trials demonstrated an improved prognosis when these regimens are adopted. In adults, incorporation of these regimens has been hampered by a perception of higher toxicity and a more complex design, especially with asparaginase. Remarkably, this drug might bring side effects not usually seen with other cancer drugs, such as thrombosis, liver, and pancreatic toxicities. In addition, the incorporation of minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring throughout the treatment protocol in a scheduled and standardized manner is considered paramount in the contemporary ALL treatment. Treating adult patients with acute leukemia under prospective studies allows accurate data collection and positively impacts the disease prognosis, creating a cooperative scientific environment. In Brazil, few data are available on the clinical- laboratory characteristics of ALL in adults and their outcomes under a standardized treatment protocol. Few single-center reports point to a worse overall survival rate when compared to developed countries. There is great heterogeneity across the centers regarding the treatment regimens and genetic/MRD assessment. In this project, the investigators intend to start a prospective registry for patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative ALL from 16 years old and above in participating centers, provided that all patients will be treated with the same regimen (a pediatric regimen BFM-based incorporating peg-asparaginase). All diagnostic/follow-up (after induction and consolidation blocks) samples will be centrally biobanked at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo. At the diagnosis, a genetic characterization encompassing conventional karyotype, fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), and molecular biology in our central laboratory will be performed to classify the cases. Genomic classification will include identifying Philadelphia- like B-cell ALL cases, a recent group of cases with worse prognosis, whose incidence seems higher in Hispanics. In Brazil, there is no study addressing this incidence and, more importantly, evaluating its impact on outcomes under a standardized treatment protocol. MRD analysis will also be centralized to standardize and validate our flow cytometry panel in a homogeneous cohort. Additionally, the investigators plan to assess baseline factors predictive of survival and relapse and those related to major toxicities such as infections, liver toxicity, and thrombosis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
180

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01246000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients from 16 years and above newly diagnosed with Philadelphia-negative ALL and after the signature of informed consent form (ICF). Patients between 16 and 17 years-old will sign a child assent along with a parental consent form. ICF application might be performed even under ALL suspicion only, given the need for sample collection before any therapy, ideally.

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Patients between 16 and 50 years-old with newly diagnosed ALL, negative for Philadelphia chromosome not previously treated (except for hydroxyurea, corticosteroids, or intrathecal chemotherapy) with 20% or more lymphoblasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Burkitt leukemia
  • Prior myeloproliferative disease
  • Philadelphia chromosome positivity through whichever methodology (RT-PCR, FISH, or conventional karyotype)
  • ECOG>2 (appendix 3)
  • Total bilirubin>2x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Transaminases>5x ULN
  • Creatinine>2,5 mg/dl
  • Positive serology for HIV or HTLV
  • Heart failure NYHA Class III or IV (appendix 4)
  • Severe psychiatric disorder which prevents adequate compliance
  • Prior treatment with intravenous chemotherapy
  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Down syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Eligible patients
All patients deemed eligible to intensive protocol of treatment are going to be included as sole group. There is no intervention or control group in this trial.
Drug: Prednisone
60 mg/m2 D1 to D21
Drug: Vincristin
1.5 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15 and D22
Drug: Daunorubicin
40 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15 and D22
Drug: Peg-asparaginase
2000 UI/m2 D12 and D26
Drug: Intrathecal Suspension
MTX 12 mg, Dexamethasone 2 mg, Cytarabine 60 mg D1, D8, D15, D22, D29
Drug: Cyclophosphamide
1000 mg/m2 D36 and D64
Drug: Cytarabine
75 mg/m2 D36 to D39, D43 to D46, D50 to D53 and D57 to D60
Drug: Mercaptopurine
30 mg/m2 D36 to D63 and D1 to D56 of consolidation
Drug: Methotrexate
3.000 mg/m2 D8, D22, D36 and D50
Drug: Doxorubicin
30 mg/m2 D1 and D22

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 4 years
cumulative proportion of patients alive (considering the time between the date of diagnosis and death or last follow-up)
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: 4 years
time between enrollment in the study and the occurrence of any event: refractoriness after the first two cycles of induction, death or relapse.
4 years
Early death rate
Time Frame: 60 days
proportion of patients who died before the first bone marrow evaluation of response (after induction I)
60 days
Complete response rate
Time Frame: 60 days
proportion of patients with bone marrow aspirate with less than 5% blasts and evidence of normal hematopoiesis; CSF without blasts and recovery of peripheral blood (neutrophils≥ 1,000/μL and platelets≥100,000/μL), without the need for transfusion
60 days
Cumulative incidence of relapse
Time Frame: 4 years
rate of disease relapse after CR calculated considering death as a competing event.
4 years
HSCT rate
Time Frame: 2 years
proportion of patients eligible for the protocol who were able to perform the procedure in their first CR
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Servier

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wellington F Silva, MD PhD, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo
  • Study Chair: Eduardo M Rego, MD PhD, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 7, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 3011/22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Lymphoid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Prednisone

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings