Virtual Ileostomy Versus Diverting Ileostomy
Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Ileostomy Versus Diverting Ileostomy in Patients Underwent Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: a Propensity-matched Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: fan li
- Phone Number: +86 023 68757958
- Email: levinecq@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Chongqing, China, 400042
- Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of rectal cancer confirmed by pathology
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Lap/robot total mesorectal excision (TME) surgical procedures and colon-rectum or colon-anal anastomosis#1.anterior resection (AR/ PME), 2. low anterior resection (LAR) , 3.intersphincteric abdominoperineal resection (ISR), 4.transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME)
- Ability to understand the nature and risks of participating in the trial
Exclusion Criteria:
- Emergency surgery, open surgery
- ASA score >3points
- Patients with combined complete intestinal obstruction
- Long-term history of using immunosuppressants or glucocorticoids
- Combined severe cardiac disease: with congestive heart failure or NYHA cardiac function ≥ grade 2. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery surgery within 6 months before the procedure
- Chronic renal failure (requiring dialysis or glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/ min)
- Intraoperative combined multi-organ resection
- Combined cirrhosis of the liver
- Intraoperative findings of incomplete anastomosis and positive insufflation test
- missing information
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Virtual ileostomy
Laparoscopic or robotic surgery with virtual ileostomy
|
Laparoscopic or robotic surgery with virtual ileostomy
|
|
Diverting ileostomy
Laparoscopic or robotic surgery with diverting ileostomy
|
Laparoscopic or robotic surgery with virtual ileostomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Calculation postoperative of the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) for each patient
Time Frame: An average of 1 year from the date of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer until the date of when the patient's condition is stabilized without complications
|
The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)summarises all postoperative complications based on the established Clavien-Dindo classification (ranging from mild complications not leading to a deviation from the normal clinical course (grade I) up to postoperative death (grade V)) at an individual patient level according to their grade of severity.
|
An average of 1 year from the date of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer until the date of when the patient's condition is stabilized without complications
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative hospitalization days
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patients in the virtual stoma group who did not have a second surgery due to complications recorded days of postoperative hospitalization after low anterior resection for rectal cancer, if the virtual stoma group required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications and all patients in the diverting ileostomy group required reoperation for stoma reversal, record days of postoperative hospitalization due to complications and/or reoperation since the data of low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Readmission rates
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patients in the virtual stoma group who did not have a second surgery due to complications recorded the number of hospitalization after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
If the virtual stoma group required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications and all patients in the diverting ileostomy group required reoperation for stoma reversal, record the number of hospitalization due to complications and/or reoperation since the data of low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
The number of hospitalizations
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patients in the virtual stoma group who did not have a second surgery due to complications recorded the number of hospitalization after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
If the virtual stoma group required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications and all patients in the diverting ileostomy group required reoperation for stoma reversal, record the number of hospitalization due to complications and/or reoperation since the data of low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Duration of bearing the stoma (months)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
If the virtual stoma group required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications and all patients in the diverting ileostomy group required reoperation for stoma reversal, record the duration of bearing the stoma since the data of surgery of diverting ileostomy.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
First hospitalization costs
Time Frame: During hospitalization,approximately 7 days
|
Patient hospitalization costs for radical resection of rectal cancer.
|
During hospitalization,approximately 7 days
|
|
Total hospitalization costs
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patients in the virtual stoma group who did not have a second surgery due to complications recorded the costs after low anterior resection for rectal cancer, if the virtual stoma group required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications and all patients in the diverting ileostomy group required reoperation for stoma reversal, record the costs due to complications and reoperation since the data of low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Whether patients undergo terminal ostomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Hartmann's procedure or for example, abdominoperineal extirpation
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Ghost ileostomy remove time
Time Frame: During hospitalization,approximately 7 days
|
Duration of days from the date of radical resection of rectal cancer to virtual stoma removed.
|
During hospitalization,approximately 7 days
|
|
The number of participants with virtual ileostomy converted to diverting ileostomy.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
The virtual stoma required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
The number of patients who required secondary abdominal surgery under general anesthesia due to complications
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Patients undergo second abdominal surgery for complications after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
The number of patients with complications after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Abdominal abscess,Anastomotic bleeding,Pelvic infection,Surgical incision infection, Peritonitis,Interventional drainage ,ileostomy wounds/abscesses/edema/dermatitis/ ulcers,Parastomal hernia ,Stoma prolapse,Anastomotic separation/poor healing, Anastomotic stenosis,Anastomotic leakage,Bowel obstruction,Anastomotic bowel necrosis ,Wound dehiscence / bleeding / sinus tract / abscess/fat liquefaction,Acute kidney injury ,Dehydration/output >1500 mL/day,Converted to permanent ileostomy,Intestinal fistula,Incisional hernia ,fecal incontinence.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Patients with stoma (terminal/loop) at 6 months after initial surgery.
Time Frame: 6 months from the date of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
|
Patients carrying stoma 6 months after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
|
6 months from the date of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
|
|
Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Time Frame: 6 months from the date of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
|
Whether the patient has completed chemotherapy.
|
6 months from the date of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: fan li, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sacchi M, Legge PD, Picozzi P, Papa F, Giovanni CL, Greco L. Virtual ileostomy following TME and primary sphincter-saving reconstruction for rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Sep;54(78):1676-8.
- Baloyiannis I, Perivoliotis K, Diamantis A, Tzovaras G. Virtual ileostomy in elective colorectal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Jan;24(1):23-31. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02127-2. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
- Murken DR, Bleier JIS. Ostomy-Related Complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 May;32(3):176-182. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676995. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
- Degiuli M, Elmore U, De Luca R, De Nardi P, Tomatis M, Biondi A, Persiani R, Solaini L, Rizzo G, Soriero D, Cianflocca D, Milone M, Turri G, Rega D, Delrio P, Pedrazzani C, De Palma GD, Borghi F, Scabini S, Coco C, Cavaliere D, Simone M, Rosati R, Reddavid R; collaborators from the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group. Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;24(3):264-276. doi: 10.1111/codi.15997. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
- Zhao S, Zhang L, Gao F, Wu M, Zheng J, Bai L, Li F, Liu B, Pan Z, Liu J, Du K, Zhou X, Li C, Zhang A, Pu Z, Li Y, Feng B, Tong W. Transanal Drainage Tube Use for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1151-1158. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4568.
- Chapman WC Jr, Subramanian M, Jayarajan S, Makhdoom B, Mutch MG, Hunt S, Silviera ML, Glasgow SC, Olsen MA, Wise PE. First, Do No Harm: Rethinking Routine Diversion in Sphincter-Preserving Rectal Cancer Resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):547-556.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.012. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
- Kim JH, Kim S, Jung SH. Fecal diverting device for the substitution of defunctioning stoma: preliminary clinical study. Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):333-340. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6389-4. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
- Tsujinaka S, Suzuki H, Miura T, Sato Y, Shibata C. Obstructive and secretory complications of diverting ileostomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 21;28(47):6732-6742. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6732.
- Huttner FJ, Probst P, Mihaljevic A, Contin P, Dorr-Harim C, Ulrich A, Schneider M, Buchler MW, Diener MK, Knebel P. Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):e038930. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038930.
- Miccini M, Amore Bonapasta S, Gregori M, Barillari P, Tocchi A. Ghost ileostomy: real and potential advantages. Am J Surg. 2010 Oct;200(4):e55-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.017.
- Zenger S, Gurbuz B, Can U, Balik E, Yalti T, Bugra D. Comparative study between ghost ileostomy and defunctioning ileostomy in terms of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Mar;406(2):339-347. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02089-w. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- VI vs. DI
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer
-
NCT01740648CompletedStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Recurrent Rectal Cancer
-
NCT07202169CompletedRectal Cancer Stage | Rectal Cancer Patients
-
NCT02107105RecruitingEvaluation of Quality of Life and Utilities Following Surgical Treatment of Stage I-IV Rectal CancerStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8
-
NCT02287727WithdrawnStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Rectal Adenocarcinoma
-
NCT04703101RecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma
-
NCT05081024RecruitingEstablishing a ctDNA Biomarker to Improve Organ Preserving Strategies in Patients With Rectal CancerStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8
-
NCT03594630RecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8
-
NCT04104139Active, not recruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8
-
NCT02874885Active, not recruitingMetastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma
-
NCT03300544TerminatedMetastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma
Clinical Trials on VI
-
NCT01193907Completed
-
NCT01636713Completed
-
NCT01608815CompletedBacterial Infections | Typhoid Fever | Salmonella Infections
-
NCT06337591Completed
-
NCT05475379Completed
-
NCT00122135CompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | Lung Cancer | Chronic Kidney Disease | Cirrhosis | Congestive Heart Failure | Colon Carcinoma
-
NCT01899638CompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive