Efficacy and Safety of Inetetamab Plus Pyrotiniband and Capecitabine in HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With or Without Brain Metastasis

August 27, 2023 updated by: Yan Xue
This study intends to include HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients (with or without brain metastasis) who have become resistant to previous treatment with trastuzumab. It will use pertuzumab in combination with pyrotinib and capecitabine to observe efficacy and safety. The choice of capecitabine as the chemotherapy drug is mainly based on the following reasons: ① it has been less commonly used as neoadjuvant treatment, making it less prone to cross-resistance; ② its oral formulation is convenient for administration, making it more acceptable to patients; ③ previous studies have shown good efficacy when combined with pyrotinib; ④ previous research in breast cancer patients with brain metastasis has also demonstrated certain effectiveness. It is hoped that through this study, preliminary evidence can be provided for the dual-target treatment of original Chinese drugs, as well as the treatment of HER2+ MBC after resistance to trastuzumab, and the addition of new data for patients with brain metastasis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Research Title A single-center, open-label, single-arm clinical study on the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab in combination with pyrotinib and capecitabine in the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who have developed resistance to previous trastuzumab treatment (with or without brain metastasis).

Study Drugs - Injectable pertuzumab: 50mg/vial - Pyrotinib: 80mg/tablet

Research Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pertuzumab in combination with pyrotinib and capecitabine in the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who have developed resistance to previous trastuzumab treatment (with or without brain metastasis). This study aims to provide preliminary evidence for the dual-target treatment of original Chinese drugs, and to add new data to the treatment model for trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ MBC and patients with brain metastasis.

Study Design A single-center, open-label, single-arm clinical study with a planned enrollment of 40 patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710100
        • Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who can voluntarily sign an informed consent form;
  • Females aged ≥18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form;
  • ECOG PS performance status score between 0 and 2;
  • Patients histologically diagnosed with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, with or without brain metastasis, and with locally recurrent disease that cannot undergo curative surgery or radiation therapy;
  • Patients who experience relapse or metastasis within 1 year during or after (neo)adjuvant pertuzumab-based targeted therapy, or disease progression during first-line pertuzumab-based targeted therapy in advanced stages;
  • Patients who have received ≤1 regimen of previous pertuzumab-based targeted therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease;
  • Brain metastasis patients must meet the following criteria: stable previous brain metastasis treatment, untreated brain metastasis with no immediate need for local treatment, or progressive previous brain metastasis without immediate need for local treatment;
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%;
  • Blood routine examination meets the following conditions: ① absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5×109/L, ② platelet count ≥100×109/L, ③ hemoglobin ≥90g/L, ④ white blood cell count ≥3.0×109/L;
  • Liver function meets the following conditions: ① serum total bilirubin ≤1.5×ULN, or ≤3×ULN if liver metastasis is present, ② aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤3×ULN, or ≤5×ULN if liver metastasis is present;
  • Renal function meets the following conditions: serum creatinine ≤1.5×ULN or creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min (creatinine clearance calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula);
  • Female patients who meet the following conditions can participate in this study: ① not fertile; ② fertility potential, with a negative pregnancy test result within 7 days before the first administration of the study drug, not breastfeeding, and consistently using highly effective contraceptive measures before study enrollment, throughout the study period, and within 6 months after the last administration of the study drug.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who have previously received Inetetamab and/or pyrotinib treatment;
  • Those who have received capecitabine treatment within the past 2 weeks before randomization;
  • Patients with noticeable symptoms who require immediate local treatment for brain metastasis;
  • Exclusion criteria include having had or currently having any other malignant tumors within the past 5 years, except for cured cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, non-melanoma skin cancer, and superficial bladder tumors [Ta (non-invasive tumor), Tis (in situ carcinoma), and T1 (tumor invasion of the basement membrane)];
  • Exclusion criteria include having undergone major surgical procedures (including thoracotomy biopsy) within the past 4 weeks before randomization, suffering from major trauma (such as bone fracture), having unhealed wounds or fractures at the time of screening, or anticipating the need for major surgery during the study treatment period;
  • Exclusion criteria include having a history of myocardial infarction within the past 6 months; New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ II congestive heart failure history, severe arrhythmia uncontrolled by medication (excluding atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia); known decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to below 50% during or after previous trastuzumab treatment;
  • Known allergy to the drugs and excipients involved in this trial;
  • Known history of hypersensitivity reactions to any investigational drug;
  • Subjects deemed unfit for participation by other researchers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Label 1
Inetetamab plus pyrotiniband and capecitabine
Drug: Inetetamab plus pyrotiniband and capecitabine
Inetetamab plus pyrotiniband and capecitabine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months
It is an indicator of the long-term efficacy of the drug
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The proportion of patients with the best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).
4 weeks
Disease Control Rate
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The proportion of patients with tumor shrinkage or stability maintained for a certain period, including cases of CR, PR, and stable disease (SD).
4 weeks
Overall survival
Time Frame: the time from randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 100 months.
It is an indicator of the long-term efficacy of the drug
the time from randomization to death from any cause, assessed up to 100 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yan Xue

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yan Xue, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CORP-239-Ｎ3

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Inetetamab plus pyrotiniband and capecitabine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings