Standard Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Supervoltage Pulsed Radiofrequency Glossopharyngeal Nerve in Oropharyngeal Cancer Pain

November 5, 2023 updated by: Hany Magdy Danial, National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Standard Pulsed Radiofrequency Versus Supervoltage Pulsed Radiofrequency Glossopharyngeal Nerve Therapy in Management of Oropharyngeal Cancer Pain: Randomized Clinical Trial.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of supervoltage pulsed radiofrequency glossopharyngeal nerve therapy versus standard pulsed radiofrequency in reduction of oropharyngeal cancer pain, through Visual analog scale score reduction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The glossopharyngeal nerve is the 9th cranial nerve. It has motor, sensory and parasympathetic function like trigeminal and facial nerves. It has its origin in the medulla oblongata and exits the skull via the jugular foramen, close to vagus and accessory nerves, together with the internal carotid artery and sympathetic nerves and terminates in the pharynx between the superior and middle pharyngeal constrictors, splitting into its terminal branches - lingual, pharyngeal, and tonsillar. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia is an extremely uncommon occurrence and accounts for only 0.2%-1.3% of the cases with facial pain. It usually affects the male individuals above 50-year age, and the reported incidence of glossopharyngeal neuralgia is roughly 0.8 per 100,000 persons per year. As per ICHD-3 (International Classification of Headache Disease- 3) classification, glossopharyngeal neuralgia is a disease characterized by an episodic unilateral pain, with sharp and stabbing in character, with sudden onset and cessation, in the glossopharyngeal nerve distribution (jaw angle, ear, tonsillar fossa and the base of the tongue). It also affect the pharyngeal and auricular branches of the vagus nerve. Pain is commonly aggravated by coughing, talking, and swallowing. Pain in glossopharyngeal neuralgia has a relapsing and remitting pattern. Vaso glossopharyngeal neuralgia may be associated with life-threatening cardiovascular features- syncope, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias, in contrast to trigeminal neuralgia

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt, 11796
        • Cairo University
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Emad G Saleh, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Raafat M Reyad, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Fady S Saad, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 Years.
  • Both sexes
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II and III.
  • Patients under pain management for oropharyngeal cancer (failed medical treatment or intolerance to the side effects of the drug).
  • Visual analog scale (VAS) equal to or more than 6 cm in spite medical treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patients with local or systemic sepsis.
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy.
  • Unstable cardiovascular disease.
  • History of psychiatric and cognitive disorders.
  • Patients allergic to medication used.7
  • Unable to lie supine.
  • Local anatomical distortion (either congenital, post-surgical or post-radiotherapy) making intervention difficult and hazardous.
  • Elongated styloid process > 25 mm.
  • Age less than 18 year and more than 70 year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group A (supervoltage pulsed radiofrequency glossopharyngeal nerve block)
Patients will receive supervoltage pulsed radiofrequency glossopharyngeal nerve block.
Procedure: Supervoltage pulsed radiofrequency glossopharyngeal nerve block
Stimulation will be done using baylis generator both sensory at 50 HZ and 0.5-1.0 V (patient felt tingling at base of tongue, throat, ear and side of upper neck) and motor at 2 HZ and 1-2 V (contraction of stylopharyngeus muscle will be felt). After injecting 1 ml lidocaine 2% plus 1 ml (4 mg) Betamethasone (Diprofos) to augment analgesia and to lower impedance (usually it was 200-300 ohm due to bony proximity).Super voltage pulsed RF(60-75 volt according to patient tolerability will be done for 8 minutes with pulse width = 5 millisecond and pulse frequency of 2 HZ.
Active Comparator: Group B (standard voltage pulsed radiofrequency glossopharyngeal nerve block)
Patients will receive standard voltage pulsed radiofrequency glossopharyngeal nerve block.
Procedure: Standard voltage pulsed radiofrequency glossopharyngeal nerve block
Stimulation will be done using baylis generator both sensory at 50 HZ and 0.5-1.0 V (patient felt tingling at base of tongue, throat, ear and side of upper neck) and motor at 2 HZ and 1-2 V (contraction of stylopharyngeus muscle will be felt). After injecting 1 ml lidocaine 2% plus 1 ml (4 mg) Betamethasone (Diprofos) to augment analgesia and to lower impedance (usually it was 200-300 ohm due to bony proximity).Super voltage8 pulsed RF will be done for 8 minutes with pulse width = 5 millisecond and pulse frequency of 2 HZ.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The degree of pain
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure

Each patient will be instructed about pain assessment with the visual analog scale (VAS) score. VAS(0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable").

VAS score will be measured at the following times: pre-procedure, day 1 after the procedure, 1,2,3,4 Weeks after the procedure, 2,3 Months after the procedure.
3 months after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine consumption
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
Morphine sulphate tablets drugs consumption will be recorded pre-procedure, day 1 after the procedure, 1,2,3,4 weeks after the procedure, 2,3 Months after the procedure.
3 months after the procedure
Gabapentin consumption
Time Frame: 3 months after the procedure
Gabapentin capsules drugs consumption will be recorded before the block and 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4weeks, 2 months and 3 months afterwards.
3 months after the procedure
Patient satisfaction score
Time Frame: 1 month after the block
Patient satisfaction score will be assessed as the following, how satisfied are the patient with the results of the procedure ? very satisfied = 5, somewhat satisfied = 4, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied = 3, somewhat dissatisfied = 2, very dissatisfied =1 It will be assessed at the following times: 24 hours after the block, 1,2 weeks after the block, 1month after the block
1 month after the block
Percentage of functional improvement
Time Frame: 1 month after the procedure
This is a self-reported analysis for the primary outcome after performing pain interventions. It is divided into 4 categories (0-25%)= no or minimal functional improvement, (more than 25-50%)= mild improvement, (more than 50-75%)= moderate improvement, and (more than 75-100%)= marked improvement.
1 month after the procedure
Quality of life score
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the procedure

Quality of life score improvement using the Flanagan quality of life scale (QOLS) ,which is a 16 -item (domain) questionnaire with each item scored from 1 to 7 points.

The scale will be explained to the patient by the pain physician, and the total score will be calculated and recorded at the preoperative10 assessment (base line) and at postoperative weeks 2,3,4, 8 and 12.
12 weeks after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 31, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2203-301-013

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Supervoltage pulsed radiofrequency glossopharyngeal nerve block

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings