Investigation of the Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients Developing Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1 in the Upper Extremity During the Subacute-Chronic Period After Ischemic Stroke

January 18, 2024 updated by: Özlem Yücealp, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
The aim of our study is to investigate transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a treatment option in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, disseminate it to a broader patient population, and simultaneously demonstrate its applicability in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome using a novel frequency matching.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

After ischemic stroke in the subacute to chronic period, 45 patients developing complex regional pain syndrome in the upper extremity will be divided into three groups: those receiving combined rTMS with conventional rehabilitation (occupational therapy and transcutaneous electrical stimulation for pain), those receiving sham rTMS with conventional rehabilitation, and those undergoing only conventional rehabilitation. The TMS group is planned to include 15 patients, the sham group 15 patients, and the group included in the conventional rehabilitation program only will also consist of 15 patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Hüma Bölük Şenlikçi Associate Professor
  • Phone Number: +905370630777
  • Email: humaboluk@gmail.com

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Ankara, Turkey, 06800
        • Recruiting
        • Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Diagnosis of ischemic stroke

Exclusion Criteria:

Epilepsy Pregnancy Cardiac Pacemaker, Brain pacemaker, Cochlear Implants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: active transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients with complex regional pain syndrome
The intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) intensity for patients, applied under doctor supervision for a total of 5 days over one week (from Monday to Friday), will be set at 70% of the resting motor threshold. Stimulation will consist of bursts at a frequency of 50 Hz, with 3 bursts every 10 seconds, each burst lasting 2 seconds, totaling 600 bursts. Subsequently, the resting motor threshold will be adjusted to 80%, and a total of 2000 bursts will be delivered at a frequency of 10 Hz, repeated every 30 seconds, each lasting 10 seconds.
Device: The Magstim Rapid2 Plus Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland, Dyfed, UK)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method that modulates the cortical excitability of the targeted motor area. While single-pulse TMS is generally used to explore the functioning of the brain, repetitive TMS is employed to induce lasting changes in brain activity. High-frequency rTMS leads to an increase in excitability in the motor cortex, whereas low-frequency application results in inhibition of motor cortical excitability. Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a form of rTMS that can be delivered continuously (cTBS) or intermittently (iTBS), thus modulating the excitability of corticospinal neurons beneath the stimulation area to either decrease or increase. rTMS is a growing research area in pain management, proven to be a safe and well-tolerated method. Studies have shown that rTMS applied to the motor cortex is a promising treatment method for chronic pain
Sham Comparator: sham transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients with complex regional pain syndrome
Similar protocol will be applied and sham transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment will be given with a sham coil to the sham group.
Device: Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation
Patients in the control group will receive sham transcranial magnetic stimulation with sham coil for 35 minutes a day, 5 sessions in total, together with conventional rehabilitation.
Placebo Comparator: conventional rehabilitation program in stroke patients with complex regional pain syndrome
Only a conventional rehabilitation program consisting of discontinuous ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and contrast bath, formed by 5 sessions, will be applied to this group.
Device: conventional rehabilitation program
Patients will receive 5 minutes of continuous ultrasound (1MHz, 2W/cm2, 1:4)), followed by a 20-minute contrast bath, and 15 minutes of TENS (frequency: 100 Hz; pulse duration: 50-100 ms; and amplitude adjusted to avoid discomfort or muscle contraction to the patient).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Before the treatment, At the end of the treatment (1 week), Four weeks after the treatment
A 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) has been used to objectively assess widespread body pain in patients. Participants use this scale to determine the intensity of their pain. While 0 represents no pain, 10 indicates the most severe pain experienced by the individual.
Before the treatment, At the end of the treatment (1 week), Four weeks after the treatment
Brunnstrom's Hemiplegia Recovery Staging
Time Frame: Before the treatment, At the end of the treatment (1 week), Four weeks after the treatment
According to Brunnstrom, the stages of recovery in patients developing paralysis due to stroke progress as follows: Stage 1, where muscles are completely flaccid; Stage 2, the emergence of muscle synergies; Stage 3, the peak of involuntary movements; Stage 4, a decrease in involuntary movements and the initiation of voluntary movements; Stage 5, the appearance of more coordinated movements; Stage 6, the disappearance of spasms and the observation of fine joint movements, approaching near-complete recovery; Stage 7, where all functions return to normal.
Before the treatment, At the end of the treatment (1 week), Four weeks after the treatment
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QoL)
Time Frame: Before the treatment, At the end of the treatment (1 week), Four weeks after the treatment
The SS-QoL is an instrument specifically used to assess health-related QoL among individuals who experienced stroke. It has 49 items in 12 domains, varying from 49 to 245 points, with responses varying from 1 to 5 points. Higher values indicate better health-related QoL.
Before the treatment, At the end of the treatment (1 week), Four weeks after the treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment
Time Frame: Before treatment (initial), at the end, four weeks after treatment
It assesses the upper extremity in three parts: shoulder-elbow-forearm (upper part of the arm), wrist, and hand, allowing for the evaluation of reflex activity, synergy patterns, and voluntary movement. The maximum score for the upper part of the arm is 36 points. Wrist assessment is scored out of 10 points, evaluating stability at different angles, joint range of motion, and complex movements. The maximum total score for upper extremity assessment using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale is 66 points.
Before treatment (initial), at the end, four weeks after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 10028974

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings