An Early Warning Model of Unfavorable Outcomes Following Endovascular Interventional Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm

April 11, 2024 updated by: Beijing Tiantan Hospital

An Early Warning Model of Unfavorable Outcomes Following Endovascular Interventional Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Based on Medical Image Analysis and Deep Learning Algorithm

Endovascular treatment has become one of the primary treatment methods for intracranial aneurysms. The unfavorable outcomes during follow-up included aneurysm recurrence and long-term incomplete-occlusion, which would bring a high risk of rebleeding and retreatment. Previous studies have tried to predict the outcomes of aneurysms following endovascular treatment based on aneurysm characteristics including morphology, embolization packing degree, etc, but the conclusion was inconsistent. Hemodynamics of aneurysms and parent artery played a greater role in predicting outcomes following endovascular treatments. Investigators also found that the outcomes were determined by many factors, in which the demography, clinical indicators, treatment methods, and material selection can not be ignored, and the mechanism of unfavorable imaging outcomes should be explored using large samples of clinical cases and numerous variable parameters. The pre-experiment of investigators confirmed that artificial intelligence technology can meet the calculation requirements for deep mining and analysis of large sample data. This study aims to use the deep learning model to identify relevant risk factors and weights, establish a stable and accurate prediction model, then incorporate the prospective study to verify the model. The results will be very helpful in accurately predicting the adverse outcomes such as recurrence and long-term non-occlusion after endovascular treatment and help to improve the therapeutic strategy and avoid risk factors. Besides, the occurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic complications during follow-up may affect the final follow-up outcome, so the analysis was included as one of the outcome events to evaluate the prognosis after intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
750

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study included the patients undergoing intravascular interventional treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of intracranial aneurysm；
  • Endovascular intervention was performed；
  • The age is more than 18 years and less than 80 years;
  • At least one follow-up of imaging data must be digital subtraction angiography with a time interval of 12 months or more;
  • The quality of image data can satisfy morphological measurement and hemodynamic calculation;
  • The patient family members were informed and consented to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dynamic aneurysms with cerebrovascular malformation;
  • Dissecting, fusiform or thrombotic aneurysms;
  • Follow-up images were not digital subtraction angiography or data quality can not meet the hydrodynamic analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
the cohort with or without unfavorable imaging outcome
Cohorts will be divided into the favorable imaging outcome group and unfavorable imaging outcome group according to the interpretation of the imaging outcome of the postoperative follow-up of intravascular interventional therapy for intracranial aneurysms
Other: Observational design does not include interventional behavior.
Observational design does not include interventional behavior.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unfavorable imaging outcome
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Unfavorable imaging outcome included the recurrence and long-term incomplete aneurysm occlusion. Any enlarged imaging of the residual portion of the aneurysm is considered a recurrence compared to immediate postoperative imaging. At the last DSA follow-up longer than 12 months, the aneurysm was not completely occluded, showing aneurysm residual portion and development (Raymond scale 3) and was judged to be long-term incomplete aneurysm occlusion.)
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemorrhagic or ischemic complication occurred during the follow-up
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Ischemic or hemorrhagic complications occurred in patients with intracranial aneurysms during follow-up after endovascular therapy
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Natural Science Foundation of China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 11, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 11, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KY2023-261-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings