Intravenous Labetalol vs Phentolamine for the Management of Severe Preeclampsia.

April 24, 2024 updated by: Mohamed Sayed Mostafa, Assiut University

Intravenous Labetalol Versus Phentolamine for the Management of Severe Preeclampsia , Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The only effective treatment of severe preeclampsia is delivery of the fetus but immediate antihypertensive treatment is given to stabilize the patient and prevent further complications. All antihypertensive medication can potentially cross the placenta. At this time, there are no randomized control trials to base a recommendation for the use of one antihypertensive agent over another. However, certain medications are effective in lowering blood pressure with an acceptable safety profile in pregnancy. The choice of therapy depends on the acuity and severity of hypertension

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-invasive assessment of cerebral haemodynamics using Transcranial doppler ultrasonography has recently gained importance. Essentially, TCD measures flow velocity in the insonated vessel and the changes in flow velocity can be taken to reflect the changes in blood flow, assuming that the diameter of the insonated vessel remains constant. As TCD is easy to use and gives reproducible measurements, it has become a widely accepted method of assessing the cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide (CRCO2), cerebral autoregulation, estimated CPP, and CrCP. In patients with neurological disorders, impairment in both cerebral autoregulation and cerebral vascular reactivity has been shown to predict poor neurological outcome. Knowledge of the effects of normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia on cerebral haemodynamics is essential for appropriate management of these patients undergoing anaesthesia or in labour, particularly when vasoactive medications are administered. The effects of pregnancy and/or pre-eclampsia on MCAFV have been studied by other investigators. Ikeda and colleagues found little change in mean MCAFV during the first two trimesters but reduced values in the third trimester. Williams and Wilson showed that MCAFV fell significantly with advancing gestational age. In another study, Williams and Wilson used TCD to assess cerebral haemodynamics in 17 non-pregnant women, 17 normotensive pregnant women, 20 pregnant women with pre-existing hypertension, and 21 pre-eclamptic women. The pregnant women were all in their third trimester. There was no difference in mean MCAFV in healthy pregnancy compared with non-pregnant women and a small, but non-significant, increase in mean MCAFV in the hypertensive and pre-eclamptic women. Demarin and colleagues studied pre-eclamptic women before and after delivery and found a progressive increase in MCAFV during late pregnancy. Ohno and colleagues compared MCAFV in 35 healthy pregnant and 17 pre-eclamptic women. In this study, the mean MCAFV was significantly higher in the pre-eclamptic group. It has been suggested that these increases in MCAFV are because of a degree of vasospasm. The differences between the findings of various studies with regards to the changes in MCAFV in pre-eclampsia might be explained by the differences in the severity of pre-eclampsia between the studies. Some investigators have reported increased MCAFV in symptomatic, compared with asymptomatic pre-eclamptics.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Pregnant woman with severe preeclampsia diagnosed by obstetric doctor

    • Patients willing to participate in the study
    • Age above 18 yrs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients with eminent eclampsia

    • The history of optic neuritis
    • Severe myopia
    • History of ocular surgeries
    • Presence of ocular ulcers
    • Any clinical or morphological conditions that prevent the ultrasound examination of the orbital area
    • Age below 18 yrs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: labetalol in the managment of severe preeclampsia
labetalol intravenous infusion (Trandate, Gsk) in a concentration of 10 mg/ ml, thus 50 mg/ml equals to 5 ml/hr. The starting infusion rate of the antihypertensive medication is 5 ml/hr for an 80 Kg patient
Drug: Labetalol
Group L will recieve labetalol intravenous infusion (Trandate, Gsk) in a concentration of 10 mg/ ml, thus 50 mg/ml equals to 5 ml/hr. The starting infusion rate of the antihypertensive medication is 5 ml/hr for an 80 Kg patient.
Other Names:
  • trandate, Gsk
Active Comparator: phentolamine in the managment of severe preeclampsia
phentolamine intravenous infusion (Rogitamine) in a concentration of 10 mg/ml, thus 1 µg/Kg/min equals to 4.8 ml/hr for an 80 Kg patient
Drug: Phentolamine
Group P will receive phentolamine intravenous infusion (Rogitamine) in a concentration of 10 mg/ml, thus 1 µg/Kg/min equals to 4.8 ml/hr for an 80 Kg patient.
Other Names:
  • Rogitamine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the effect of Labetalol and Phentolamine on MCA flow velocity by transcranial Doppler monitoring.
Time Frame: 6 hours
Singleton pregnant women who suffered from late onset preeclampsia will be enrolled and subjected to baseline Transcranial doppler (TCD) evaluation to measure middle cerebral artery (MCA) blood flow indices including mean flow velocity (cm/s).
6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effect of labetalol and phentolamine on blood pressure of the patients
Time Frame: 6 hours
through measuring the blood pressure in (mmHg)
6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assiut University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 24, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • severe preeclampsia

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings