tDCS and Upper Extremity Function in Stroke

March 19, 2025 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Transcranial Direct Cranial Stimulation on Upper Limb Function and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients

Research on the effects of Anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on hand dexterity and quality of life in stroke patients is limited. While the highlighted article focuses on Parkinson's disease, it underscores anodal tDCS potential to modulate brain activity and promote neural plasticity, suggesting potential relevance to stroke rehabilitation

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

tDCS seems like a hopeful way to help stroke patients improve their upper limb function, but there are still some problems and questions that need to be answered. Previous studies have investigated the impact of (tDCS) on upper limb recovery among stroke patients. However, evidence is scarce on the effect of tDCS on hand dexterity and quality of life in stroke patients. Furthermore, these studies have not adequately explored how the severity of stroke influences the efficacy of tDCS on upper limb motor recovery. Additionally, there is a lack of research examining the cumulative effects of tDCS on both upper limb motor recovery and hand dexterity, as well as QoL, particularly concerning stroke severity.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Pakistan
    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Pakistan Railway General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke for more than 6 months.
  • Age 40-80 years
  • Both gender
  • National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for severity level (Mild (1-4), Moderate (5-15), Moderate to Severe (16-20), Severe (21-42)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient with Upper limb amputation on the effected side, contracture, burn injury that leads to joint limitation and functional limitation.
  • Known cases of Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinson and any Musculoskeletal disorder and Cardiopulmonary disorder.
  • Any patient with Metallic implants
  • Individuals with a history of seizures or epilepsy
  • Individuals with Skin allergies on the scalp

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Active tDCS
The dosage of anodal tDCS will be 20 minutes with an intensity of 2mA. It's administered before exercise therapy sessions over a period of 8 weeks and 3 times a week
Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation
The two key landmarks for EEG electrode placement are the nasion and the inion which are used to define the measurement. Measure the distance between the nasion and the inion along the midline of the head. Divide the nasion-inion distance by two to find the midpoint and mark this midpoint on the scalp along the midline. C3 (left hemisphere of the scalp) and C4 (right hemisphere of the scalp), which are placed 20% of the nasion-inion distance from the midline, and M1, which is placed 10% of this distance from the midline, can be determined using these calculations. From the midpoint marked on the scalp, measure to the left and right sides using the calculated 10% and 20% distances. Mark these points as M1 and its mirror position. Clean the scalp at the marked M1 and its mirror position locations to remove any oils or debris.
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS Group
sham tDCS, task-oriented training (i.e. placing cones on another cone, inserting needles into a box
Device: Sham transcranial direct current stimulation
it can apply in sitting or supine lying position but it's important to ensure their comfort and safety while facilitating optimal electrode placement and contact with the scalp. Duration of 20 minutes, with Intensity of 0.5mA, and density of 0.02 mA/cm² for 8 weeks on alternative days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FMA-Upper Extremity
Time Frame: 8 week
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) is a clinical tool for evaluating motor recovery in stroke and neurological conditions affecting the upper limbs and with a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 89%. It assesses motor function through tasks like reaching and grasping, scored on a 3-point scale. Higher scores indicate better function, with a maximum score of 66. Clinicians use it to track progress, plan treatment, and assess outcomes in rehabilitation settings
8 week
Action Research Arm Test
Time Frame: 8 week
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate upper limb function and recovery in individuals who have experienced a stroke or other neurological conditions affecting arm movement. The ARAT consists of a series of 19 items/tasks that assess different aspects of upper limb function, including reaching, grasping, gripping, and manipulating objects of various sizes and shapes. The tasks are scored based on the individual's ability to complete them successfully and the quality of movement exhibited during the task. Scores range from 0 to 3. (0=Unable to perform, 1= Partially performs the task, 2= Completes the task with some difficulty and 3= Completes the task without difficulty)
8 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke Specific Quality of Life
Time Frame: 8 week
The of Stroke Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) questionnaire is a tool used to assess the quality of life in individuals who have experienced a stroke. The SS-QOL reveals a sensitivity of 70.0% and a specificity of 75.8%. It measures various domains including physical function, mobility, social participation, emotional well-being, and cognition. The SS-QOL helps clinicians and researchers understand the impact of stroke on a person's overall quality of life and modify interventions accordingly
8 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Riphah International University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 19, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • REC01900 Tayyab Awan

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

March 2025 to August 2025

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Transcranial direct current stimulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings