Revised Capsular Polishing and Its Impact on the Positioning of the Intraocular Lens and Visual Quality Following Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery (ELPVQFLACS)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Xin Zhou, Master
- Phone Number: +8613571858770
- Email: 286211583@qq.com
Study Locations
-
-
Shaanxi
-
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710000
- Xin Zhou
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with age-related cataract
- Patients seeking to reduce their reliance on corrective eyewear postoperative and exhibiting high expectations for optimal visual acuity at all distances - near, intermediate, and distant
- Anticipated postoperative astigmatism of ≤1.00D
- Pupil diameter in a darkened environment ranging from 3.0-5.5 mm
- Kappa angle ≤0.5 mm or less than half the diameter of the central refractive optical zone of the MIOL.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Progressive and aggravated retinal diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, preretinal membrane, vitreous macular traction syndrome, Stargardt disease, retinitis pigmentosa, etc., and serious optic nerve diseases
- Small eyeballs, ultra-high myopia, obvious pupil abnormalities, severe corneal lesions, severe irregular astigmatism, chronic uveitis, glaucoma, obvious abnormalities of lens capsule membrane and suspension ligament, major degree alternating strabismus and other ocular organic diseases and amblyopia
- Severe mental and psychological diseases
- History of internal eye surgery
- Posterior capsule rupture or uneventful in-the-bag IOL implantation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: control
The control group did not undergo improved polishing, the conventional I/A polishing the capsule instead.
|
the conventional I/A polishing the capsule
|
|
Active Comparator: polished
The polished group did the improved capsular polishing.
|
In the polished group,utilize the OVDs to partially fill the peripheral capsule, causing the central posterior capsule to bulge, and then employ the double-ended Whitman Shepherd capsular polisher to meticulously polish both the anterior and equator of the capsule.
This process also allows for simultaneous polishing of a portion of the posterior capsule.
By rotating the polisher 180°along one side, followed by switching ends to cover the remaining 180° range, even the main incision site can be effectively addressed due to its curved tip design.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
visual acuity
Time Frame: The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
|
Utilize decimal visual acuity charts for assessment purposes and record the findings in LogMAR format to facilitate statistical analysis.
|
The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
|
|
strehl ratio(SR)
Time Frame: The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
|
This is one of the visual quality indicators.
It's assessed by OQAS II instrument.
SR that represents the ratio of the central peak value of the point spread function in an aberration-free system to that in a aberration system with the same pupil diameter, the higher the value is, the better the optical quality is.
|
The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
|
|
modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF cutoff)
Time Frame: The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
|
MTF cutoff that characterizes the spatial frequency corresponding to the minimum resolution of human eyes in the modulation transfer function curve, and the higher the value is, the better the optical quality becomes,and it is immune to subjective factors and provides an objective assessment of the optical imaging quality across the entire refractive system of the artificial lens eye.
|
The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
|
|
objective scatter index (OSI)
Time Frame: The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
|
OSI that objectively reflects the scatter of the refractive medium,a higher OSI ratio indicates a more severe degree of scatter in the patient.
|
The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20150824
- 2023-YBSF-054 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Special Fund for Key Research and Development Projects in Shaanxi Province)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.