Revised Capsular Polishing and Its Impact on the Positioning of the Intraocular Lens and Visual Quality Following Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery (ELPVQFLACS)

September 20, 2024 updated by: Xin Zhou, Xi'an People's Hospital (Xi'an Fourth Hospital)
This study aims to investigate the impact of improved capsular polishing on the long-term stability of effective lens position (ELP) and visual quality in patients following femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery combined with intraocular lens implantation. Throughout the follow-up period, changes in ELP were observed using OCT to measure the central corneal posterior surface to the IOL anterior surface. The contraction of the anterior capsule orifice was assessed through anterior segment photography, and its diameter and area were measured and analyzed using drawing software at each follow-up visit. Additionally, the investigators analyzed the correlation between the degree of anterior capsule orifice contraction and ELP, as well as examined whether ACO formed and its degree, PCO formation and its degree. Objective examination using OQAS II was conducted to measure PSF, MTF, OSI, and SR of patients; high-order aberrations including astigmatism, trifolium, and spherical aberration were measured by OPD-Scan III. Furthermore, the investigators investigated the correlation between ACO/PCO degrees and visual quality.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710000
        • Xin Zhou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with age-related cataract
  2. Patients seeking to reduce their reliance on corrective eyewear postoperative and exhibiting high expectations for optimal visual acuity at all distances - near, intermediate, and distant
  3. Anticipated postoperative astigmatism of ≤1.00D
  4. Pupil diameter in a darkened environment ranging from 3.0-5.5 mm
  5. Kappa angle ≤0.5 mm or less than half the diameter of the central refractive optical zone of the MIOL.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Progressive and aggravated retinal diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, preretinal membrane, vitreous macular traction syndrome, Stargardt disease, retinitis pigmentosa, etc., and serious optic nerve diseases
  2. Small eyeballs, ultra-high myopia, obvious pupil abnormalities, severe corneal lesions, severe irregular astigmatism, chronic uveitis, glaucoma, obvious abnormalities of lens capsule membrane and suspension ligament, major degree alternating strabismus and other ocular organic diseases and amblyopia
  3. Severe mental and psychological diseases
  4. History of internal eye surgery
  5. Posterior capsule rupture or uneventful in-the-bag IOL implantation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: control
The control group did not undergo improved polishing, the conventional I/A polishing the capsule instead.
the conventional I/A polishing the capsule
Active Comparator: polished
The polished group did the improved capsular polishing.
In the polished group,utilize the OVDs to partially fill the peripheral capsule, causing the central posterior capsule to bulge, and then employ the double-ended Whitman Shepherd capsular polisher to meticulously polish both the anterior and equator of the capsule. This process also allows for simultaneous polishing of a portion of the posterior capsule. By rotating the polisher 180°along one side, followed by switching ends to cover the remaining 180° range, even the main incision site can be effectively addressed due to its curved tip design.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual acuity
Time Frame: The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
Utilize decimal visual acuity charts for assessment purposes and record the findings in LogMAR format to facilitate statistical analysis.
The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
strehl ratio(SR)
Time Frame: The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
This is one of the visual quality indicators. It's assessed by OQAS II instrument. SR that represents the ratio of the central peak value of the point spread function in an aberration-free system to that in a aberration system with the same pupil diameter, the higher the value is, the better the optical quality is.
The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF cutoff)
Time Frame: The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
MTF cutoff that characterizes the spatial frequency corresponding to the minimum resolution of human eyes in the modulation transfer function curve, and the higher the value is, the better the optical quality becomes,and it is immune to subjective factors and provides an objective assessment of the optical imaging quality across the entire refractive system of the artificial lens eye.
The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
objective scatter index (OSI)
Time Frame: The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.
OSI that objectively reflects the scatter of the refractive medium,a higher OSI ratio indicates a more severe degree of scatter in the patient.
The data were collected at various time points for follow-up: preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 1-month postoperative, 3-month postoperative, 6-month postoperative, and 1-year postoperative.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20150824
  • 2023-YBSF-054 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Special Fund for Key Research and Development Projects in Shaanxi Province)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on improved capsular polishing

Subscribe