Innovations in Hearing Accessibility and Technology (IHAT) Study (IHAT)
Effectiveness Trial to Examine the Emerging Service Delivery Models for Over-the-Counter (OTC) Hearing Aids
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Research Service Professional
- Phone Number: 303-724-8465
- Email: ihat@cuanschutz.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Preeti Pandey, PhD
- Email: preeti.pandey@cuanschutz.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- Recruiting
- University of Colorado School of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Research Service Professional
- Phone Number: 303-724-8465
- Email: ihat@cuanschutz.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Vinaya Manchaiah, AuD, MBA, PhD
-
Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80305
- Recruiting
- University of Colorado Boulder
-
Contact:
- Research Service Professional
- Phone Number: 303-724-8465
- Email: ihat@cuanschutz.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Anu Sharma, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult onset, bilateral, mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss documented by audiological evaluation
- Aged 40 years or older
- No previous HA experience greater than 3 months
- Able to read and understand patient education materials
- Willing to be randomized to one of the four groups, and
- Owns a smartphone
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hearing loss that is too severe for OTC HAs
- Middle ear disorders or conductive pathology present
- Asymmetrical hearing loss
- Diagnosed neurological condition such as dementia or Parkinson's disease or a score lower than 25 on the MOCA
- Non-English speaking as it may impact the ability to complete our test battery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: HA-HCP
|
Prescription hearing aid fit by a hearing healthcare professional using audiology best practices.
|
|
Experimental: OTC-HCP
|
Over-the-counter hearing aids fit by a hearing care professional using audiology best practices.
|
|
Experimental: OTC-R
|
OTC fit to an individual using some best practices via remote consultation.
|
|
Active Comparator: OTC-SF
|
Self-fit OTC hearing aids without any clinical support from HCPs.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
Time Frame: T0 = Baseline, T1 = 6 months post intervention, T2 = 12 months post intervention
|
It is a 24-item self-reported measure of hearing disability and hearing aid benefit.
It includes four subscales that address different listening challenges: ease of communication, reverberation, background noise, and aversiveness of sounds, with each subscales comprising six items.
The ease of communication, reverberation, and background noise primarily measure challenges related to speech communication.
The global score on the APHAB is the average of these three subscale scores.
The hearing aid benefit is calculated by comparing the difficulty level reported without amplification (unaided) to the difficulty level with amplification (aided).
Scores range from 1% to 99%, with higher scores indicating greater perceived hearing difficulty.
|
T0 = Baseline, T1 = 6 months post intervention, T2 = 12 months post intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living (SADL)
Time Frame: T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
SADL is a 15-item self-reported outcome measure that evaluates an individual's satisfaction with their hearing aids on a 7-point rating scale.
The questionnaire is divided into four subscales.
The positive effect subscale quantifies improved performance with hearing aids.
The personal image subscale quantifies self-image and stigma.
The negative feature subscale evaluates undesirable aspects of using hearing aids.
The service and cost subscale assesses the adequacy of the professional's service and the device's cost.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with hearing aids.
|
T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
|
Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory -Screening (RHHI-S)
Time Frame: T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
It is a 10-item self-perceived hearing handicap measure that can be used for adults of all ages.
The response options on this scale are yes (4), sometimes (2), and no (0), and ranges from 0 to 40.
The total score is the sum of all the responses, with higher scales indicating greater perceived difficulties.
|
T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)
Time Frame: T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
PGI-C assesses the patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment with a single-item questionnaire on a 7-point rating scale.
Lower scores indicate improved outcomes.
|
T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
|
Connected Speech Test (CST)
Time Frame: T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
The connected speech test is a sentence intelligibility test consisting of 48 passages with 8-10 sentences of a connected discourse spoken by a female speaker.
A pair of passages will be presented to the participant, and the 25 keywords in each passage will be scored for percentage correct score.
A higher percentage correct score indicates higher sentence intelligibility.
|
T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
|
Quick Speech in Noise (QuickSIN)
Time Frame: T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
It assesses the patient's ability to hear in background noise.
The patient repeats sentences that are embedded in different noisy environments and the result is a signal-to-noise ratio loss.
The test stimuli are pre-recorded sentences embedded in speech babble at varying signal-to-noise ratios from easy to very difficult.
|
T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Vinaya Manchaiah, AuD, MBA, PhD, University of Colorado, Denver
- Principal Investigator: Anu Sharma, PhD, University of Colorado, Boulder
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- De Sousa KC, Manchaiah V, Moore DR, Graham MA, Swanepoel W. Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):522-530. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0376.
- De Sousa KC, Manchaiah V, Moore DR, Graham MA, Swanepoel W. Long-Term Outcomes of Self-Fit vs Audiologist-Fit Hearing Aids. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep 1;150(9):765-771. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.1825.
- Knoetze M, Manchaiah V, De Sousa K, Moore DR, Swanepoel W. Comparing Self-Fitting Strategies for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Crossover Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep 1;150(9):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2007.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23-2351
- R01DC021653 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.