- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06689865
Innovations in Hearing Accessibility and Technology (IHAT) Study (IHAT)
November 15, 2024 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver
Effectiveness Trial to Examine the Emerging Service Delivery Models for Over-the-Counter (OTC) Hearing Aids
The research will explore outcomes of different service delivery models of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids by comparing them to prescription hearing aids fitted by specialists in individuals with mild to moderate hearing loss.
The investigators will examine how each type affects users' experiences, behavior, thinking skills, and brain activity related to hearing.
Additionally, the study will focus on what types of people prefer each hearing aid option, what helps or hinders these choices, and compare the costs of four different service options.
This approach will help transition from research findings into real-world practice, providing useful information for healthcare providers and policymakers about OTC hearing aid options.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim of the proposed project is to evaluate the effectiveness of emerging over-the-counter (OTC) service delivery models with the gold standard traditional prescription hearing aids fit by hearing care professionals (HCP) using audiology best practices.
OTC service delivery models include OTC HA fit to individual users using best practices with in person HCP support (OTC-HPC), via remote consultation (OTC-R) and self-fit OTC HAs without any clinical support (OTC-SF).
The study will use a prospective four-arm randomized controlled trial design with longitudinal repeated measures.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
280
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Research Service Professional
- Phone Number: 303-724-8465
- Email: ihat@cuanschutz.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Preeti Pandey, PhD
- Email: preeti.pandey@cuanschutz.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- Recruiting
- University of Colorado School of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Research Service Professional
- Phone Number: 303-724-8465
- Email: ihat@cuanschutz.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Vinaya Manchaiah, AuD, MBA, PhD
-
Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80305
- Recruiting
- University of Colorado Boulder
-
Contact:
- Research Service Professional
- Phone Number: 303-724-8465
- Email: ihat@cuanschutz.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Anu Sharma, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult onset, bilateral, mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss documented by audiological evaluation
- Aged 40 years or older
- No previous HA experience greater than 3 months
- Able to read and understand patient education materials
- Willing to be randomized to one of the four groups, and
- Owns a smartphone
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hearing loss that is too severe for OTC HAs
- Middle ear disorders or conductive pathology present
- Asymmetrical hearing loss
- Diagnosed neurological condition such as dementia or Parkinson's disease or a score lower than 25 on the MOCA
- Non-English speaking as it may impact the ability to complete our test battery
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: HA-HCP
|
Prescription hearing aid fit by a hearing healthcare professional using audiology best practices.
|
|
Experimental: OTC-HCP
|
Over-the-counter hearing aids fit by a hearing care professional using audiology best practices.
|
|
Experimental: OTC-R
|
OTC fit to an individual using some best practices via remote consultation.
|
|
Active Comparator: OTC-SF
|
Self-fit OTC hearing aids without any clinical support from HCPs.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
Time Frame: T0 = Baseline, T1 = 6 months post intervention, T2 = 12 months post intervention
|
It is a 24-item self-reported measure of hearing disability and hearing aid benefit.
It includes four subscales that address different listening challenges: ease of communication, reverberation, background noise, and aversiveness of sounds, with each subscales comprising six items.
The ease of communication, reverberation, and background noise primarily measure challenges related to speech communication.
The global score on the APHAB is the average of these three subscale scores.
The hearing aid benefit is calculated by comparing the difficulty level reported without amplification (unaided) to the difficulty level with amplification (aided).
Scores range from 1% to 99%, with higher scores indicating greater perceived hearing difficulty.
|
T0 = Baseline, T1 = 6 months post intervention, T2 = 12 months post intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living (SADL)
Time Frame: T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
SADL is a 15-item self-reported outcome measure that evaluates an individual's satisfaction with their hearing aids on a 7-point rating scale.
The questionnaire is divided into four subscales.
The positive effect subscale quantifies improved performance with hearing aids.
The personal image subscale quantifies self-image and stigma.
The negative feature subscale evaluates undesirable aspects of using hearing aids.
The service and cost subscale assesses the adequacy of the professional's service and the device's cost.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with hearing aids.
|
T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
|
Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory -Screening (RHHI-S)
Time Frame: T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
It is a 10-item self-perceived hearing handicap measure that can be used for adults of all ages.
The response options on this scale are yes (4), sometimes (2), and no (0), and ranges from 0 to 40.
The total score is the sum of all the responses, with higher scales indicating greater perceived difficulties.
|
T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)
Time Frame: T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
PGI-C assesses the patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment with a single-item questionnaire on a 7-point rating scale.
Lower scores indicate improved outcomes.
|
T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
|
Connected Speech Test (CST)
Time Frame: T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
The connected speech test is a sentence intelligibility test consisting of 48 passages with 8-10 sentences of a connected discourse spoken by a female speaker.
A pair of passages will be presented to the participant, and the 25 keywords in each passage will be scored for percentage correct score.
A higher percentage correct score indicates higher sentence intelligibility.
|
T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
|
Quick Speech in Noise (QuickSIN)
Time Frame: T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
It assesses the patient's ability to hear in background noise.
The patient repeats sentences that are embedded in different noisy environments and the result is a signal-to-noise ratio loss.
The test stimuli are pre-recorded sentences embedded in speech babble at varying signal-to-noise ratios from easy to very difficult.
|
T0= Baseline, T1= 6 months post intervention, T2= 12 months post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Vinaya Manchaiah, AuD, MBA, PhD, University of Colorado, Denver
- Principal Investigator: Anu Sharma, PhD, University of Colorado, Boulder
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- De Sousa KC, Manchaiah V, Moore DR, Graham MA, Swanepoel W. Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):522-530. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0376.
- De Sousa KC, Manchaiah V, Moore DR, Graham MA, Swanepoel W. Long-Term Outcomes of Self-Fit vs Audiologist-Fit Hearing Aids. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep 1;150(9):765-771. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.1825.
- Knoetze M, Manchaiah V, De Sousa K, Moore DR, Swanepoel W. Comparing Self-Fitting Strategies for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Crossover Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep 1;150(9):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2007.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 13, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2029
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 13, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
November 15, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 19, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 15, 2024
Last Verified
November 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23-2351
- R01DC021653 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss
-
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbHCompletedHearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural | Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss, Unilateral | Hearing Loss, MixedAustria, Germany, United Kingdom
-
Oticon MedicalCompletedEar Diseases | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss Mixed | Hearing Disability | Conductive Hearing Loss | Conductive Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Conductive Hearing Loss, UnilateralUnited Kingdom
-
Oticon MedicalNot yet recruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound
-
University of California, San FranciscoPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteRecruitingHearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural | Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced | Hearing Loss, Unilateral | Hearing Loss, Mixed | Hearing Disorders in ChildrenUnited States
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of ManchesterCompletedCochlear Hearing Loss | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralUnited Kingdom
-
Truway Health, Inc.Enrolling by invitationSensorineural Hearing Loss | Tinnitus | Sudden Hearing Loss | Acoustic Trauma | Inner Ear Injury | Noise-Induced Hearing Loss | Vestibular DysfunctionUnited States
-
Envoy Medical CorporationActive, not recruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss | Sensorineural Hearing Loss (Disorder) | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound | Sensori-Neural DeafnessUnited States
-
Oticon MedicalCompletedConductive Hearing Loss | Conductive and Sensori-neural Hearing Loss in the Same Ear | Unilateral, Profound Sensori-neural Hearing LossUnited States
-
Frequency TherapeuticsCompletedHearing Loss, Sensorineural | Presbycusis | Noise Induced Hearing Loss | Sudden Hearing LossUnited States
-
Frequency TherapeuticsCompletedHearing Loss, Sensorineural | Noise Induced Hearing Loss | Sudden Hearing LossUnited States
Clinical Trials on HA-HCP
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiRegion Stockholm; Hospital Universitario La Fe; University of GlasgowCompleted
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
NYU Langone HealthCompletedPancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteCompleted
-
University of California, IrvineNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedHypertension | Medication AdherenceUnited States
-
CelgeneAmalgam RxTerminated
-
National Cancer Centre, SingaporeSingapore General Hospital; Singhealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical...Completed
-
University of TorontoCompleted
-
Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoUniversita degli Studi di Genova; IRCSS Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata...CompletedDiabetic Foot Ulcer | PRP | Allogeneic | Skin LesionsItaly
-
Turtle Health, Inc.CompletedFertility RiskUnited States