Autologous Blood Monocyte Vesicles for the Treatment of Sudden Deafness

December 24, 2024 updated by: Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

A Pilot Study of Autologous Blood Monocyte Vesicles for the Treatment of Sudden Deafness

Sudden deafness is a common emergency in otorhinolaryngology. As the etiology and mechanism of sudden deafness remains unknown, there is no specific treatment. Therefore, to explore new treatments for sudden deafness is a urgent and challenging problem. Extracellular vesicles therapy has been proved to be effective for several diseases. From our previous study, extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stem cell can effectively improve noise-induced sensorineural deafness in mice. While mesenchymal stem cell therapy faces immune rejection in clinical use, the investigators use autologous blood monocyte vesicles to avoid immune rejection and guarantee patients' safety. In this interventional study, the investigators aimed to study the clinical effects and adverse reactions of autologous blood monocyte vesicle therapy in the treatment of sudden deafness. A total of 30 patients with severe or worse sudden deafness will enroll in this study and randomly assigned to 3 group, which are control group (Intratympanic glucocorticoid injection), lower-dose apoVs group (lower dose of Intratympanic monocyte vesicles injection) and higher-dose apoVs group (higher dose of Intratympanic monocyte vesicles injection). This study will further promote new treatment for sudden deafness and improve the quality of life and prognosis of patients with sudden deafness, especially those with severe or extremely severe deafness.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 18 and 65.
  • Patients with severe and above unilateral hearing loss who meet the diagnostic criteria for sudden deafness.
  • Patients who suffer sudden deafness within 3 weeks and do not receive intratympanic injection.
  • Patients who fully understand the purpose and requirements of the trial, volunteer to participate in the clinical trial, sign a written informed consent, and is willing to complete the whole trial process according to the trial requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with conductive deafness and mixed deafness;
  • Patients with other otologic diseases;
  • Those who have doubts about the treatment plan or have obvious mental and psychological disorders;
  • Patients with severe heart, lung, liver and kidney dysfunction;
  • Patients with severe hematological diseases or tumors (especially those with acoustic neuromas);
  • Those with positive HIV antibody, HBsAg, HCV antibody, or serological examination results for syphilis;
  • Patients with a history of infection within 1 month prior to screening, requiring hospitalization and / or antibiotics, or currently using systemic hormones (corticosteroids), immunosuppressants or cytotoxicity;
  • Patients with a history of immune system diseases or hematological system diseases;
  • Patients with abnormal blood findings, such as abnormal number and morphology of red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets;
  • Patients with severe or unstable cardiovascular, respiratory, liver, kidney, blood, endocrine, and central nervous system diseases;
  • Women during lactation, pregnancy, or possibly pregnancy;
  • Patients with contraindications or allergies to the treatment of this study;
  • Those who have participated in any clinical drug trial in the past 3 months;
  • Patients that the Investigator considers unsuitable to participate in the trial;
  • Patients not suitable for tympanic injection therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: control
Intratympanic injection of methylprednisolone (methylprednisolone succinic acid for injection) at a dose of 40mg/mL, three times a week. 40mg of methylprednisolone was dissolved in 0.2 ml of lidocaine injection and 0.8 ml of sterilized injection water.
Drug: Methylprednisolone
40mg of methylprednisolone was dissolved in 0.2 ml of lidocaine injection and 0.8 ml of sterilized injection water. Intratympanic injection of methylprednisolone was performed three times a week.
Experimental: apoVs(lower dose)
Intratympanic injection of autologous blood monocyte vesicles, three times a week. Autologous blood monocyte vesicles were extracted from 20 ml peripheral blood from patients and dissolved in 0.2 ml of lidocaine injection and 0.8 ml of sterilized injection water.
Biological: autologous blood monocyte vesicles (lower dose)
20 ml peripheral venous blood was extracted from each patient, anticoagulated with heparin and diluted with PBS. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll stratified solution. Extracellular vesicles of mononuclear cells were extracted by gradient centrifugation (800g centrifugation at 4 ℃ for 10 minutes, then 2000g centrifugation at centrifuged at 4 ℃ for 10 minutes and then 16000g centrifugation at 4 ℃ for 30 minutes. The precipitate was taken as monocyte vesicle and stored in refrigerator at 4 ℃. For intratympanic injection, precipitate was dissolved in 0.2 ml of lidocaine and 0.8 ml of sterilized injection water. Intratympanic injection of apoVs was performed three times a week.
Experimental: apoVs(higher dose)
Intratympanic injection of autologous blood monocyte vesicles, three times a week. Autologous blood monocyte vesicles were extracted from 50 ml peripheral blood from patients and dissolved in 0.2 ml of lidocaine injection and 0.8 ml of sterilized injection water.
Biological: autologous blood monocyte vesicles (higher dose)
50 ml peripheral venous blood was extracted from each patient, anticoagulated with heparin and diluted with PBS. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll stratified solution. Extracellular vesicles of mononuclear cells were extracted by gradient centrifugation (800g centrifugation at 4 ℃ for 10 minutes, then 2000g centrifugation at centrifuged at 4 ℃ for 10 minutes and then 16000g centrifugation at 4 ℃ for 30 minutes. The precipitate was taken as monocyte vesicle and stored in refrigerator at 4 ℃. For intratympanic injection, precipitate was dissolved in 0.2 ml of lidocaine and 0.8 ml of sterilized injection water. Intratympanic injection of apoVs was performed three times a week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Audiometry
Time Frame: 4 weeks after intervention.
Pure tone audiometry.
4 weeks after intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Audiometry
Time Frame: 1 week, 2 weeks after intervention
Pure tone audiometry
1 week, 2 weeks after intervention
THI scale
Time Frame: 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention.
THI (tinnitus handicap inventory) is one of the most widely used tinnitus self-rating scales in the world.It consists of three dimensions: functional, emotional and severity and effect of decreased tinnitus on patients' daily life. The THI score is totally 100 points. The more score participants get, the severer tinnitus symtoms they suffer from. According to the total score, paticipants were divided into five grades, Grade I (0-16, light) , Grade II (18-36, mild) , Grade III (38-56, moderate) , grade IV (58-76, severe) , grade V (78-100, catastrophic).
1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention.
Tinnitus VAS
Time Frame: 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention.
The VAS(visual analogue scale) for subjective severity of tinnitus focuses on the subjective assessment of general sensation. The VAS has a scale score of 0 to 10, with 0 being completely unaffected and 10 being very severely affected.
1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention.
SAS
Time Frame: 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention.
The SAS(Self-Rating Anxiety Scale) consists of 20 items which reflect the subjective and feeling of Anxiety. The more score paticipants get, the more anxiety they suffer. The SAS score can be divided into 4 levels: normal(less than 50 score), mild anxiety(50-59 score), moderate anxiety(60-69 score) and severe anxiety(more than 69 score).
1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention.
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention.
Local adverse events include hearing loss, otitis media, and unperforation of tympanic membrane. Systemic adverse events include vital signs instability, new-onset anemia, liver and kidney dysfunction and so on. The severity of adverse events was graded according to the Common Adverse Event Evaluation Criteria (CTCAE) 5.0, Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild; clinical or diagnostic only; treatment free. Grade 2: Moderate; requiring small, local, or non-invasive treatment; limited instrumental daily living activities comparable to age. Grade 3: serious or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization; disability; limited activities of daily life. Grade 4: life-threatening; requiring urgent treatment. Grade 5: Death related to AEs.
1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 24, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SYSKY-2023-1250-02

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings