Cardiac RadiothErapy for VEntricular Tachycardia II (CREVET II)

April 28, 2026 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Cardiac RadiothErapy for VEntricular Tachycardia II - a Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Steoreotactic therapy radioablation has become a standard of care option for patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia, yet long-term outcome is lacking. The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes, both efficacy and safety, after STAR in patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia who are scheduled for stereotactic radiotherapy ablation (STAR) are eligible for participation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible for STAR for therapy-refractory VT based on a multidisciplinary discussion
  • Ability to give a written informed consent and willingness to return for follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contra-indications for STAR, including pregnancy or breastfeeding, previous radiotherapy with cardiac involvement, life-expectancy < 6 months in the absence of VT
  • Any condition that is deemed a contraindication in the judgment of the investigators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in VT burden
Time Frame: 48 months
Change in VT burden, measured as the frequency of appropriate ICD interventions or documented VT episodes over a 48-month follow-up period. The ICD interrogations are part of standard of care and the majority of patients are included in remote monitoring which automatically sends new VT episodes to the telemonitoring team. The efficacy of STAR will be assessed by analysing both the total VT burden, but also time to first VT event (with and without a 6 week blanking period).
48 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline and at each follow-up moment: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months
The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality of life measures that rely on patient self-reporting. The SF-36 evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. Scale values for each domain range from 0 to 100 where the higher score defines a more favorable health state over a 48-month follow-up period.
Baseline and at each follow-up moment: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 48 months
Survival will be tracked during the 48-month follow-up period. In case of mortality, the cause of death will be registered.
48 months
Radiotherapy toxicity
Time Frame: 48 months
The tolerable acute toxicity rate is defined as a 30-days follow-up without treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events. Late toxicity is defined as toxicity occurring after at least 30 days after the radiation treatment. Toxicity will be assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0).
48 months
Left ventricular function
Time Frame: Baseline and at each follow-up moment: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months
Left ventricular function on transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) by measuring left ventricular ejection fraction.
Baseline and at each follow-up moment: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months
Evolution of valve disease
Time Frame: Baseline and at each follow-up moment: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months
Change of pre-existing or new valve stenosis and insufficiency expressed as grade 0 / I / II / III / IV on transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE).
Baseline and at each follow-up moment: 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months
Change of coronary artery disease
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 years and 4 years
Presence and extent of coronary artery disease on CT coronary angiogram at 2 and 4 years follow-up using the calcium score and CAD-RADs stage.
Baseline, 2 years and 4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • S69812

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings