The Comparison of Tunnel Morphology and Graft Healing in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using Peroneus Longus And Hamstring Tendons
- Comparison of the grafts using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MR) to determine whether their maturation and bone integration are different,
- Comparison of the grafts using Computerized Tomography (CT) to determine whether their effects on the tunnels opened in cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries are different,
- In the event that graft healing and effects on the tunnels differ between grafts, determination of whether these differences are related to patient clinics,
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The project method; Patients who will be operated with 2 different grafts used in anterior cruciate ligament surgeries will be included in 2 different randomized groups of 29 people (hamstring and peroneus groups) determined by obtaining their informed consent before the surgery and then,
- The maturation of the grafts will be measured and compared with the SNQ (Signal/Noise quotient) value and the graft-bone integration with the measuring Tendon Bone Healing Grade with the Magnetic Resonance (MR) to be taken at the 1st year controls after the surgery,
- Changes in tunnel morphology; The volume of the tunnels will be measured with the Computerized Tomography (CT) imaging method to be taken prospectively within the first week after the surgery date and 1 year after the surgery date and the changes within 1 year will be calculated by comparing them.
- In the outpatient clinic follow-ups of both groups; Knee laxity will be obtained with Lachman, Anterior drawer and Pivot shift tests and knee scores and activity levels will be obtained using IKDC, Lysholm, Marx activity scales and it will be examined whether these data are related to SNQ, Tendon Bone Healing Grade and tunnel expansion.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Fevzi Gurkan Aslan, Medical Doctor
- Phone Number: +905377085171
- Email: fevzigurkanaslan@yahoo.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Trabzon, Turkey (Türkiye)
- Karadeniz Technical University, Orthopedic and Traumatology Department
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 18 and 45 years.
- BMI in the range of 18 to 28.
- Diagnosed with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury preoperatively confirmed by MRI.
- Patients for whom it is deemed appropriate to harvest ipsilateral hamstring tendons or Peroneus Longus tendon for use as a graft.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of previous surgery on the affected knee or ankle.
- Presence of multiple ligament injuries in the affected knee.
- ACL injuries that occurred more than 12 months prior to surgery.
- Evidence of unstable meniscal injury on preoperative MRI that may alter the -postoperative rehabilitation protocol.
- Inability to obtain a graft diameter of at least 9 mm using the isolated graft.
- Presence of meniscal tears requiring repair.
- Presence of advanced chondral lesions requiring surgical intervention.
- Intraoperative detection of multiple ligament injuries.
- Requirement for additional surgical procedures that would alter the standard rehabilitation protocol.
- Occurrence of intraoperative surgical complications.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Peroneus Longus Group
Participants who underwent ACL reconstruction using Peroneus Longus tendon graft.
|
Surgical procedure using Peroneus Longus for ACL reconstruction.
|
|
Active Comparator: Hamstring Group
Participants who underwent ACL reconstruction using Hamstring tendon graft.
|
Surgical procedure using Hamstring tendons for ACL reconstruction.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Graft Maturation Assessed by Signal-to-Noise Quotient (SNQ) on MRI
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively.
|
Comparison of graft maturation between peroneus longus and hamstring tendon autografts using SNQ values obtained from 1-year postoperative MRI.
|
1 year postoperatively.
|
|
Change in Tunnel Volume Assessed by CT
Time Frame: Within 1 week post-surgery and at 1 year post-surgery.
|
Comparison of tunnel volume changes between peroneus longus and hamstring tendon autografts by measuring tunnel volume via CT imaging performed within the first week and 1 year after surgery.
|
Within 1 week post-surgery and at 1 year post-surgery.
|
|
Tendon-Bone Healing Assessed by MRI Grading System
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively.
|
Comparison of graft-bone integration between peroneus longus and hamstring tendon autografts using MRI Grading System obtained from 1-year postoperative MRI.
|
1 year postoperatively.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Relationship Between Tunnel Changes and Clinical Outcomes
Time Frame: At 1-year follow-up.
|
Assessment of whether tunnel volume changes correlate with knee function, activity levels, or laxity test results.Statistical correlation analysis between tunnel volume changes and clinical outcomes.
|
At 1-year follow-up.
|
|
Knee Laxity Assessed by Clinical Tests
Time Frame: At 1-year follow-up.
|
Comparison of knee laxity (Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot shift tests) between groups and correlation with graft healing (SNQ, Tendon bone healing grade) and tunnel expansion.Clinical grading of laxity based on standard examination protocols.
|
At 1-year follow-up.
|
|
Comparison of Graft Healing and Tunnel Changes Between Groups
Time Frame: 1 year postoperatively.
|
Evaluation of whether differences in SNQ, Tendon bone healing grade, or tunnel volume changes are specific to patient demographics or clinical characteristics.
|
1 year postoperatively.
|
|
Patient-Reported Knee Function and Activity Levels
Time Frame: At 1-year follow-up.
|
Comparison of knee function and activity levels between groups using IKDC, Lysholm, and Marx scales and evaluation of correlations with SNQ, Tendon bone healing grade, and tunnel volume changes.Standardized scoring from IKDC, Lysholm, and Marx Activity scales.
|
At 1-year follow-up.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 24237859510
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.