The Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin and Crisugabalin in Patients With Fibromyalgia
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Monotherapy Versus Other Neuromodulatory Drugs (Crisugabalin) in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Multicenter Clinical Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Fang Luo, M.D.
- Phone Number: +86 13611326978
- Email: 13611326978@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beijing, China
- Recruiting
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, Beijing 100070
-
Contact:
- Fang Luo
- Phone Number: +8613611326978
- Email: 13611326978@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with FM according to the 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 FM diagnostic criteria;
- Aged over 18 years old;
- Suffering from moderate to severe FM, refractory to non-pharmacological interventions and without prior exposure to recommend pharmacological treatments for FM;
- Baseline numeric rating scale (NRS) score of 4 or higher;
- Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels below twice the upper limit of normal range;
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 30 mL/min/1.73 m²;
- Willingness to provide informed consent and adequate cognitive and language capabilities to meet all study requirements;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous allergic reactions to pregabalin, crisugabalin, or any of their excipients;
- Prior diagnosis of epilepsy or depression requiring antidepressant therapy;
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
- Has severe systemic illnesses, such as poorly controlled hypertension, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, or significant cardiac impairment;
- Suffering from acute or chronic pain disorders other than FM.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Pregabalin group
|
For the pregabalin group, treatment will be initiated at a dosage of 150 mg daily, administered into 2 or 3 divided doses.
After 3 to 7 days, the dose will be titrated to 300 mg per day, with subsequent incremental increases of 150 mg daily permitted at 3-day to 7-day intervals based on therapeutic response and tolerability, up to a maximum dose of 450 mg daily.
|
|
Experimental: Crisugabalin group
|
For the crisugabalin group, therapy will begin at 20 mg twice daily, with a maximum allowable dose of 40 mg twice daily.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The proportion of patients achieving pain relief
Time Frame: At the 12-weeks
|
The proportion of patients achieving pain relief defined as the proportion of patients whose baseline average pain intensity is reduced by at least 50%.
The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
|
At the 12-weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The short-form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
|
The SF-36 assesses health-related quality of life, capturing preferences across various health states.
It assesses 8 dimensions: physical functioning, physical role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health.
Scores range from 0 to 100 for each dimension, with higher scores indicating better health status.
|
At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
|
|
The average pain intensity
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
The average pain intensity.
The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
|
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
|
The worst pain intensity
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
The worst pain intensity.
The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
|
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Dose of crisugabalin or pregabalin
Time Frame: At the week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
|
the dose of experimental drug
|
At the week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
|
|
Average weekly consumption of rescue analgesics
Time Frame: at weeks 4, 8, 12
|
Acetaminophen will be permitted as rescue medication for FM-related pain, at doses up to 1000 mg per administration and not exceeding 3000 mg per day.
All rescue medication use, including dose and frequency, will be recorded prospectively.
|
at weeks 4, 8, 12
|
|
The Revised FM Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
|
The Revised FM Impact Questionnaire is a 21-item self-administered questionnaire, based on symptoms reported within the preceding 7 days.
The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating worse health status.
|
At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
|
|
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) severity (BPI-S) and interfere (BPI-I) subsc
Time Frame: At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
|
The BPI-S assesses pain intensity over the past 24 hours, including 4 items.
The BPI-I evaluates the degree to which pain interferes with daily activities, comprising 7 items.
Each BPI item is rated on a 0 to 10 NRS, with 0 represents no pain or does not interfere, and 10 represents worst pain imaginable or interferes completely.
Higher scores indicate greater pain severity or interfere.
|
At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Scale
Time Frame: at week 12
|
A 7-point patient-reported Likert scale for evaluating subjective overall change in health/symptoms from baseline, used to assess treatment efficacy in clinical research and practice.
|
at week 12
|
|
The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS)
Time Frame: At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
|
The MOS uses a 6-point scale to evaluate various dimensions of sleep, consisting of 12 items.
A score of 1 indicates persistent presence, with a score of 6 denotes complete absence.
|
At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
|
|
The Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ (BD-Ⅱ)
Time Frame: At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
|
The BD-Ⅱ employs a 4-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3) to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms, comprising 21 items in total.
A score of 0 indicates the absence of symptoms, while a score of 3 reflects severe symptomatology.
|
At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
|
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
|
Adverse Events are defined as events that occur the course of treatment, were not present before prior to the intervention, or represent a worsening of pre-existing conditions.
These events will be systematically documented and categorized by severity into grades such as mild, moderate, severe, or life-threatening.
|
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
- Mathieson S, Lin C-WC, Underwood M, Eldabe S. Pregabalin and gabapentin for pain. BMJ. 2020;369:m1315. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1315
- Domon Y, Arakawa N, Inoue T, Matsuda F, Takahashi M, Yamamura N, et al. Binding Characteristics and Analgesic Effects of Mirogabalin, a Novel Ligand for the α2δ Subunit of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2018;365(3):573-82. doi: 10.
- Gou X, Yu X, Bai D, Tan B, Cao P, Qian M, et al. Pharmacology and Mechanism of Action of HSK16149, a Selective Ligand of α2δ Subunit of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel with Analgesic Activity in Animal Models of Chronic Pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2021;376
- Chen Q, Wu Q, Song R, Wang Y, Zhang M, Li F, et al. A phase I study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a novel, potent GABA analog HSK16149 in healthy Chinese subjects. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1296672.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Pain
- Fibromyalgia
- Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins
- Organic Chemicals
- Acids, Acyclic
- Carboxylic Acids
- Amino Acids
- gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
- Aminobutyrates
- Butyrates
- Pregabalin
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KY2025-217-03-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.