A Virtually Delivered Diet Intervention (LASO-3) for the Improvement of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Cancer Survivors Post-treatment

June 22, 2026 updated by: University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Feasibility of a Virtually Delivered LASO-3 Diet Intervention for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Post-Treatment Cancer Survivors

This clinical trial studies whether a virtually delivered diet intervention focused on lower added sugar, higher fiber, and higher omega 3 fatty acid (LASO-3) can be used to improve chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in cancer survivors after treatment. Cancer survivors often experience CIPN during and after cancer treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapy. CIPN is characterized by nerve damage from chemotherapy that leads to numbness, tingling, or pain in the hands or feet. However, there are few treatments to manage CIPN. Inflammation contributes to the development of CIPN and dietary patterns that have been demonstrated to improve diet quality and reduce inflammation in cancer survivors may be promising for use as a CIPN management strategy. The LASO-3 diet intervention consists of virtually delivered nutrition education sessions provided by a Registered Dietitian. The sessions focus on three dietary goals, informed by the United States Dietary Guidelines for Americans: 1) lowering added sugar intake to < 10% of daily calories, 2) increasing daily fiber intake to ≥ 20 grams, and 3) increasing intake of moderate-high omega-3 seafood to three or more servings weekly or 3300-3400 mg/day of alpha-linolenic acid (e.g., plant-based sources include canola or flaxseed oil, walnuts, or flaxseed or chia seeds). The Registered Dietitian tailors the sessions to the patient based on information and feedback obtained throughout the sessions. The LASO-3 diet intervention may be an effective way to improve CIPN in cancer survivors after treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

02MAY2026- Amendment was approved to update inflammatory disease exclusion criteria.

28MAY2026- Amendment was approved to clarifying the eligibility to exclude individuals who have preexisting peripheral neuropathy (instead of neuropathy overall as this is not specific and could include centralized pain).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Recruiting
        • University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Robert Knoerl

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • At least three months since last receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy
  • Self-report moderate (≥ 2/4) numbness and tingling on the Patient Reported Outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™) Numbness and Tingling Severity Item in the last week
  • Speak/read English
  • Have access to the internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy from any cause
  • Plan to begin a new prescription of duloxetine (i.e., first-line treatment for CIPN pain) during the study period
  • Are enrolled in symptom management trials that may alter CIPN severity
  • High grade inflammatory disease such as lupus, Crohn's disease, or rheumatoid arthritis
  • Routine nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or steroid supplementation
  • Consuming an average three or more servings of fish per week and/or consuming fish oil capsules containing eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)+ docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) daily or consuming flax oil capsules daily
  • Consuming an average of less than 5 servings of sweets, candy bars, chocolate, doughnuts, cookies, cakes, pie, brownies, ice cream, pastries, or sugar sweetened beverages (e.g., soda or coffee/tea) per week

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm I (LASO-3 sessions)
Patients attend virtual LASO-3 nutrition counseling sessions over 30 minutes QW for 4 weeks followed by LASO-3 nutrition counseling sessions over 15 minutes Q2W for 8 weeks. Patients also undergo blood sample collection throughout the trial.
Procedure: Biospecimen Collection
Undergo blood sample collection
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Other: Survey Administration
Ancillary studies
Other: Interview
Ancillary studies
Other: Electronic Health Record Review
Ancillary studies
Active Comparator: Arm II (general health education sessions)
Patients attend eight virtual general health education sessions over 15-30 minutes each over 12 weeks. Patients also undergo blood sample collection throughout the trial. Patients may also receive the intervention materials and up to 4 dietary counseling sessions post-study.
Procedure: Biospecimen Collection
Undergo blood sample collection
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Other: Survey Administration
Ancillary studies
Other: Electronic Health Record Review
Ancillary studies
Other: Educational Intervention
Attend virtual general health education sessions
Other Names:
  • Education for Intervention
  • Intervention by Education
  • Intervention through Education
  • Intervention, Educational

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment of all participants (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Feasibility will be established if the following benchmark is met, recruitment of all participants within a two-year period (Demand). The observed recruitment rate will be estimated along with exact 80% confidence intervals (CIs).
Up to 2 years
Completion of baseline and 12-week patient-reported outcome measures (Feasibility)
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 weeks
Feasibility will be established if the following benchmark is met, ≥ 60% completion of baseline and 12-week patient-reported outcome measures. The observed retention rate will be estimated along with exact 80% CIs.
At baseline and 12 weeks
Percent of LASO-3 participants who attend at least 5 out of 8 intervention sessions (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Feasibility will be established if the following benchmark is met, ≥ 60% of LASO-3 participants attend at least 5 out of 8 intervention sessions (Implementation). The observed retention rate will be estimated along with exact 80% CIs.
Up to 12 weeks
Percent of LASO-3 participants who self-report adherence to dietary goals (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Feasibility will be established if the following benchmark is met, ≥ 60% of LASO-3 participants self-report adherence to dietary goals via VioScreen food frequency questionnaire and/or monthly adherence checklists (Practicality). The observed adherence rate will be estimated along with exact 80% CIs.
Up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability and satisfaction with the twelve-week LASO-3 diet intervention
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
Will determine the LASO-3 diet group participants' perspectives of acceptability and satisfaction with the twelve-week intervention using semi-structured interviews. Semi-structured interviews will be professionally transcribed and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Transcripts will be uploaded to NVivo (QSR International), where Dr. Knoerl and the research team will independently derive codes, collaboratively group them into categories, and identify key themes with representative quotations.
At 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hope Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robert Knoerl, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 23, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 22, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UMCC 2025.077
  • NCI-2025-07988 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • HUM00274541 (Other Identifier: University of Michigan)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

we will only share de-identified data with others upon reasonable request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings