A Phase 3 Study of Fenfluramine Hydrochloride in Rett Syndrome

August 13, 2026 updated by: UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study With Open-Label Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy And Safety of Fenfluramine Hydrochloride in Study Participants With Rett Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of fenfluramine hydrochloride (HCl) versus placebo in study participants with Rett syndrome (RTT).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 11001
  • France
      • Brest, France
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 12005
  • Hungary
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 15001
      • Debrecen, Hungary
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 15002
  • Italy
      • Troina, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 17006
  • Japan
      • Kodaira, Japan
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 43004
      • Musashimurayama-shi, Japan
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 43006
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 43002
      • Setagaya-ku, Japan
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 43003
  • Poland
      • Krakow, Poland
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 19002
  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 11105
      • Málaga, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 11103
      • Seville, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 11102
  • United States
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72202
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 21010
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 21011
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 21007
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 21005
      • Irving, Texas, United States, 75062
        • Recruiting
        • Ep0247 21013

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has typical or classic Rett Syndrome (RTT) according to the RettSearch Consortium 2010 revised criteria
  • Participant has a documented disease-causing mutation or deletion in the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene
  • Participant meets criteria for postregression for at least 6 months prior to Screening, defined as:
  • No loss or degradation of ambulation (including gait, coordination, or independence of walking/standing);
  • No loss or degradation of hand function; no loss or degradation of speech (including babbling, words, or previously developed communicative vocalizations);
  • No loss or degradation of nonverbal communicative or social skills (including eye gaze, using body to indicate communicative intent, or social attentiveness)
  • Participant has an Rett Syndrome Clinical Severity Scale (RTT-CSS) rating of 10 to 36 (inclusive)
  • Participant has a Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGIS) score of ≥4
  • Participant has a legal representative capable of providing signed informed consent on behalf of the participant as described in the protocol, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in the protocol.
  • Participant is aged 5 to 35 years of age (inclusive) at the time of first administration of investigational intervention.
  • Male or female.
  • Participant has a consistent caregiver who is ≥18 years of age at the Screening Visit. The caregiver needs to be able to complete the caregiver assessments defined for the entire study. Every attempt should be made to have the same evaluator complete the assessments for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a history of lymphoma, leukemia, or any malignancy within the past 5 years except for basal cell or squamous epithelial carcinomas of the skin that have been resected with no evidence of metastatic disease for 3 years.
  • Participant has clinically significant abnormality in vital signs according to the Investigator

  • Participant has an exclusionary cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary abnormality based on echocardiogram (ECHO), electrocardiogram (ECG), or physical examination, and is not approved for entry by the central cardiac reader. Exclusionary abnormalities include, but are not limited to:

    1. Greater than trace aortic valve regurgitation.
    2. Greater than mild mitral valve regurgitation.
    3. Possible signs of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with abnormal pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) or PASP ≥35 mmHg.
    4. Evidence of left ventricular dysfunction (systolic or diastolic).
    5. Clinically significant structural cardiac abnormality, including but not limited to mitral valve prolapse, atrial or ventricular septal defects, or patent ductus arteriosus with reversal of shunt (right to left shunt). Note: Patent foramen ovale without a reversal of shunt or a bicuspid aortic valve is not considered exclusionary
  • Participant has a clinically significant medical condition, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, portal hypertension, or need for invasive mechanical ventilation (eg, via tracheostomy), or has had clinically relevant symptoms or a clinically significant illness currently or in the 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit that would negatively impact study participation, collection of study data, or pose a risk to the participant
  • Participant is taking >4 concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs). Rescue medications are not included in the count

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: fenfluramine hydrochloride
Participants will receive fenfluramine hydrochloride for 14 weeks in a double-blind period (including titration and maintenance), followed by a 2-week double-blind transition period. This is followed by a 52-week open-label treatment period. Participants may continue treatment until alternative access is available. Those who discontinue without continued access will undergo an 8-day taper and a 26-week follow-up.
Drug: fenfluramine hydrochloride
Oral solution
Other Names:
  • Fintepla, ZX008
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will receive a matching placebo for 14 weeks in a double-blind period (including titration and maintenance). After this period, they transition into a 2-week double-blind period with fenfluramine hydrochloride, followed by a 52-week open-label treatment period. Participants may continue treatment until alternative access is available. Those who discontinue without continued access will undergo an 8-day taper and a 26-week follow-up.
Other: Placebo
Oral solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline to Week 14 in Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) Total Score
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 14
The RSBQ is a caregiver-completed, instrument assessing behavioral and emotional features in RTT. The RSBQ consists of 45 items, including 8 subscales: General mood (8 items); Breathing problems (5 items); Hand behavior (6 items); Face movements (4 items); Body rocking and expressionless face (6 items); Nighttime behaviors (3 items); Fear/anxiety (4 items); and Walking/standing (2 items). Caregivers are asked to evaluate each RTT feature based on the current status of the patients on a 3-point scale as 0 ("not true"), 1 ("somewhat or sometimes true"), or 2 ("often true"), with the total score ranging from 0 to 90. Higher scores indicate increased disease severity. Seven items that do not belong under any of the subscales are classed as "uncategorized" but contribute to the overall total score.
From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 14
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Score at Week 14
Time Frame: At Week 14
The CGIC is a clinician-rated single item evaluating the degree of improvement or worsening of a participant's condition from Baseline following treatment or intervention. The CGIC uses a 7-point response scale, with the following ratings: "1: Very Much improved", "2: Much improved", "3: Minimally improved", "4: No change", "5: Minimally worse", "6: Much worse", "7: Very Much Worse".
At Week 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline to Week 14 in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Sleep Disturbance (PROMIS-SD) score
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 14
Sleep disturbances will be assessed by the PROMIS-SD parent proxy 8a version. Caregivers are asked to rate 8 items over the past 7 days on a 5-point scale: "1: Never", "2: Almost never", "3: Sometimes", "4: Almost always", and "5: Always", with higher scores indicating more severe sleep disturbances.
From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 14
Change from Baseline to Week 14 in Observer-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA) score
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 14
The ORCA is an 84-item, observer-reported measure of communication ability over the past 30 days. The majority of the items included in the ORCA measure have 3 response options: "No or only once," "Sometimes," and "Yes, almost all the time", which enable derivation of an overall communication score and scores for each form of communication (expressive, receptive, and pragmatic), with higher scores indicating greater communication ability.
From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 14
Caregiver Global Impression of Change - Seizure (CaGIC-Seizure) score at Week 14
Time Frame: At Week 14
The CaGIC-Seizure is a caregiver-reported item assessing the change from Baseline in the participant's seizure status. The CaGIC-Seizure uses a 7-point response scale, with the following ratings: "1: Very Much improved", "2: Much improved", "3: Minimally improved", "4: No change", "5: Minimally worse", "6: Much worse", "7: Very Much Worse".
At Week 14
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the double-blind intervention period
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events that are not present prior to the pharmaceutical product administration or an already present event that worsens either in intensity or frequency.
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Incidence of serious TEAEs during the double-blind intervention period
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, meets 1 or more of the criteria listed:

  • Results in death
  • Is life-threatening
  • Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
  • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
  • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect
  • Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Incidence of TEAEs leading to discontinuation during the double-blind intervention period
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events that are not present prior to the pharmaceutical product administration or an already present event that worsens either in intensity or frequency. TEAEs leading to discontinuation will be reported.
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Incidence of related TEAEs during the double-blind intervention period
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events that are not present prior to the pharmaceutical product administration or an already present event that worsens either in intensity or frequency. Related TEAEs will be reported.
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Change from Baseline in QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) interval on 12-lead ECG by visit during the double-blind intervention period
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Change from Baseline in QTcF interval as measured by 12-lead ECG up to Week 14 by visit will be reported
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Incidence of treatment-emergent Doppler Echocardiogram (ECHO) results meeting the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) case definition of drug-associated valvular heart disease (VHD) during the double-blind intervention period
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
The FDA case definition of drug-associated VHD is aortic regurgitation ≥mild and/or mitral regurgitation ≥moderate with restricted valve motion, valve thickening, and/or physical signs or symptoms attributable to valve diseases. ECHO readings related to VHD on any of the 4 valves (aortic, mitral, pulmonary, tricuspid) will be reported with grades of absent, trace, mild, moderate, or severe.
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Incidence of treatment-emergent Doppler ECHO results meeting the FDA case definition of PAH (defined as a PASP >35mmHg) during the double-blind intervention period
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
ECHO readings related to pulmonary arterial hypertenstion (PAH) will be reported based on Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP).
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from baseline to end of safety follow up
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events that are not present prior to the pharmaceutical product administration or an already present event that worsens either in intensity or frequency.
From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
Incidence of serious TEAEs from baseline to end of safety follow up
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)

An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, meets 1 or more of the criteria listed:

  • Results in death
  • Is life-threatening
  • Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
  • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
  • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect
  • Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the patients or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.
From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
Incidence of TEAEs leading to discontinuation from baseline to end of safety follow up
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events that are not present prior to the pharmaceutical product administration or an already present event that worsens either in intensity or frequency. TEAEs leading to discontinuation will be reported.
From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
Incidence of related TEAEs from baseline to end of safety follow up
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events that are not present prior to the pharmaceutical product administration or an already present event that worsens either in intensity or frequency. Related TEAEs will be reported.
From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
Change from Baseline in QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) interval on 12-lead ECG by visit from baseline to end of safety follow up
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
Change from Baseline in QTcF interval as measured by 12-lead ECG up to Week 98 by visit will be reported
From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
Incidence of treatment-emergent Doppler Echocardiogram (ECHO) results meeting the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) case definition of drug-associated valvular heart disease (VHD) from baseline to end of safety follow up
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
The FDA case definition of drug-associated VHD is aortic regurgitation ≥mild and/or mitral regurgitation ≥moderate with restricted valve motion, valve thickening, and/or physical signs or symptoms attributable to valve diseases. ECHO readings related to VHD on any of the 4 valves (aortic, mitral, pulmonary, tricuspid) will be reported with grades of absent, trace, mild, moderate, or severe.
From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
Incidence of treatment-emergent Doppler ECHO results meeting the FDA case definition of PAH (defined as a PASP >35mmHg) from baseline to end of safety follow up
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)
ECHO readings related to pulmonary arterial hypertenstion (PAH) will be reported based on Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP).
From Baseline (Day1) to the End of Safety Follow Up (up to 3 years and 10 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: UCB Cares, 0018445992273

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 14, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 6, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 29, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 31, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EP0247
  • 2025-523157-34 (Other Identifier: EU CTR)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings