Predicting Pathological Complete Response in Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning

March 29, 2026 updated by: Hongpeng Jiang, Peking University People's Hospital

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model Based on Clinical and MRI Features for Predicting Pathological Complete Response in Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

This study aims to develop and validate a robust machine learning-based prediction model utilizing baseline clinical data and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. The objective is to preoperatively predict the probability of achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (CRC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study aims to develop and validate a predictive model based on pre-neoadjuvant clinical, laboratory, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features to estimate the probability of pathological complete response (pCR) in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This retrospective study will enroll patients who received nCRT followed by radical resection at Peking University People's Hospital between December 2017 and October 2025 as the development cohort. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression will be used for feature selection, and machine learning algorithms will be applied to construct the prediction model. Model performance will be comprehensively evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, precision-recall curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis will be performed to enhance model interpretability. The final model is expected to provide an individualized pCR prediction tool to guide clinical decision-making for rectal cancer patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
320

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100044
        • Peking University People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic rectal cancer who underwent standard radical surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with histopathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma;
  2. Clinical stage cT3-4, or cN+, or M1 advanced rectal cancer;
  3. Received standardized neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
  4. Underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) after the completion of neoadjuvant therapy, with complete postoperative pathological data available.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous history of other malignant tumors;
  2. Incomplete clinical data;
  3. Underwent emergency surgery during nCRT;
  4. Complicated with systemic infection or hematological diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) defined by Tumor Regression Grade (TRG)
Time Frame: Evaluated during routine histopathological examination of the resected surgical specimen immediately following radical surgery (typically within 1 to 2 weeks post-surgery).
The primary endpoint is the occurrence of pCR, assessed by two independent pathologists using the AJCC/CAP Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) system. TRG 0 (no viable cancer cells, only fibrosis or mucin pools) is defined as a positive outcome (pCR). TRG 1 to 3 are combined and defined as a negative outcome (non-pCR). The predictive performance of the model will be evaluated utilizing several metrics including the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC), Precision-Recall (PR) curve, Calibration curve, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA).
Evaluated during routine histopathological examination of the resected surgical specimen immediately following radical surgery (typically within 1 to 2 weeks post-surgery).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the prediction model
Time Frame: At the completion of model development and validation
To evaluate the discrimination performance of the model for pCR prediction
At the completion of model development and validation
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the prediction model
Time Frame: At the completion of model development and validation
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the model at the optimal cut-off value
At the completion of model development and validation
Calibration curve of the prediction model
Time Frame: At the completion of model development and validation
To evaluate the consistency between the predicted pCR probability and the actual observed pCR rate
At the completion of model development and validation
Net benefit of the model quantified by decision curve analysis (DCA)
Time Frame: At the completion of model development and validation
To evaluate the clinical utility of the model across different threshold probabilities
At the completion of model development and validation
Variable importance quantified by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis
Time Frame: At the completion of model development and validation
To interpret the contribution of each predictor to the model prediction
At the completion of model development and validation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University People's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Hong-Peng Jiang, docter, Peking University People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 4, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2026PHB131-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings