Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

April 18, 2014 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

CSP #474 - Radial Artery vs. Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (Radial Artery)

VA patients with coronary artery disease and who have agreed to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery would be randomized to receive either radial artery or saphenous vein to the study vessel. The primary outcome variable is graft patency at one year.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Primary Hypothesis:

Radial artery grafts will have a higher graft patency rate at one year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) compared to saphenous vein grafts.

Secondary Hypotheses:

Determine if there are any differences in clinical outcomes, cost and quality of life in patients receiving radial artery versus saphenous vein grafts.

Intervention: 1) Saphenous vein graft. This is the standard conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting to all areas of the heart except the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. 2) Radial artery. This is the experimental conduit. Preference should be given to harvesting from the non-dominant arm.

Primary Outcomes: 1-year post CABG surgery patency rates

Study Abstract:

Although the radial artery was introduced as a potential conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting in the 1970s, enthusiasm for its use was limited by the technical difficulty of harvesting the vessel and problems with perioperative vascular spasm. In spite of this, some surgeons persisted based on their belief that arterial conduits would be better than vein grafts, in terms of long-term patency. With the development of new harvesting techniques and the introduction of calcium channel blockers to prevent vasospasm, the use of the radial artery graft has increased in recent years. This use of the radial artery as a conduit is not based on any long-term prospective data regarding its patency. However, because the VA has been a leader in defining the long-term efficacy/patency of saphenous vein and internal mammary grafts, it is appropriate for the VA to investigate radial artery grafts. In fact, the VA under its Cooperative Studies Program, is probably the only health care delivery system that has the ability to undertake this study.

Study Design:

The study is a prospective, randomized, unblinded clinical trial. The population consists of VA patients with coronary artery disease documented by coronary arteriography and who have agreed to undergo coronary artery bypass surgery. Medical conditions which could affect blood flow through the patient's arm are the main exclusion criteria. These include Raynaud's symptoms, positive Allen test, neurologic or musculoskeletal disease affecting the arm and patients with one arm.

Patients who are eligible and agree to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to receive one radial artery graft or one saphenous vein graft to the following vessels: left anterior descending if internal mammary not used, circumflex, diagonal, and right coronary artery. The surgeon will determine the subject vessel preoperatively by selecting the vessel that is suitable for grafting.

The stratification factors will be the participating hospital and which vessel is to be bypassed, left anterior descending versus all other vessels.

History, physical examination, laboratory tests, and cardiac catheterization will be performed at baseline and at one year. Follow-up clinic visits will be at two weeks, three, six, and nine months post CABG. Coronary angiography will be performed one week and one year post surgery. Quality of life and hand/leg functional status will be assessed at baseline, three months, and one year. Cost measures will be captured.

Biostatistical Considerations:

For this trial, a sample size of 874 randomized patients will be required. This will provide 90% power to detect a difference in one-year patency rates of 92% for the radial artery versus 83% for the saphenous vein and an expected one-year catheter completion rate of 65%.

This is a five year study. There will be four years of patient accrual and one year of follow-up. Nine participating VA medical centers will be expected to randomize two patients per month.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

733

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • VA Medical Center, Birmingham
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85723
        • Southern Arizona VA Health Care System
    • Arkansas
      • No. Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72114-1706
        • Central Arkansas VHS Eugene J. Towbin Healthcare Ctr, Little Rock
    • Illinois
      • Hines, Illinois, United States, 60141-5000
        • Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Southeast Veterans Healthcare System, New Orleans
    • Massachusetts
      • Brockton, Massachusetts, United States, 02301
        • VA Boston Healthcare System, Brockton Campus
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48113
        • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417
        • VA Medical Center, Minneapolis
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87108-5153
        • New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249
        • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients needing coronary artery bypass grafts.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who require only a single vessel bypass and in whom the internal mammary artery will be used for that graft
  • Patients with previous stripping and ligation of saphenous veins and in whom no venous conduit is available for bypass
  • Patients with Raynaud's symptoms
  • Patients who have a creatinine above 2.0 mg/dL or require hemodialysis
  • Patients with a positive Allen test
  • Patients with cardiogenic shock
  • Patients who are unable to give consent
  • Patients allergic to contrast material
  • Patients undergoing repeat CABG or any form of robotic surgery
  • Patients who do not have full use of both arms
  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients with neurologic or musculoskeletal disease affecting the arm
  • Patients who refuse to participate
  • Patient requires any concomitant valve operation in the mitral, aortic, or pulmonary position. Isolated tricuspid annuloplasty is acceptable, but tricuspid valve replacement excludes the patient from consideration.
  • Patient requires concomitant Dor or Maze procedure
  • Patient is in another research study
  • No suitable radial target (there is no non-LAD vessel with a >70% stenosis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Saphenous Vein Graft
Procedure: saphenous vein graft
Saphenous vein harvested from the arm is used as a conduit for CABG.
Active Comparator: Radial Artery Graft
Procedure: radial artery graft
Radial artery harvested from the arm is used as a conduit for CABG.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To Compare 1-year Angiographic Patency of Radial Artery Grafts Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery.
Time Frame: 1 year
The primary end point was angiographic graft patency at 1 year after coronary artery bypass surgery, defined as any opacification of distal target by injection of the graft. The window for the 1-year angiogram was 2 to 24 months. This window was chosen to capture early clinically indicated angiograms and late selective angiograms in patients who did not have symptoms. Study grafts that were occluded at 1 week after coronary artery bypass graft surgery were considered occluded at 1 year. One-year graft patency data were missing if patients whose study grafts were patent at 1 week did not undergo an angiogram within the time window or if the central angiography laboratory was not able to determine graft patency.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Death
Time Frame: Within 1 year of surgery.
Within 1 year of surgery.
Myocardial Infarction
Time Frame: Within 1 year of bypass surgery
Within 1 year of bypass surgery
Stroke
Time Frame: Within 1 year of bypass surgery
Within 1 year of bypass surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Steven Goldman, MD, Southern Arizona VA Health Care System

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2003

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2003

First Posted (Estimate)

February 13, 2003

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 474

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on saphenous vein graft

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Congo

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe