Dosing Study of Ara-C/EL625/Idarubicin in Refractory and Relapsed AML

September 16, 2014 updated by: Eleos, Inc.

Open Label, Phase II Dosing Study of Ara-C Chemotherapy in Combination With EL625 and Idarubicin in Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

The principal goal of this clinical trial is to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) to improve cancer responsiveness to the established AML therapeutic agent Idarubicin used alone or in combination with Cytarabine (Ara-C).

Cenersen sodium is a drug that is designed to block the effects of a protein called p53. Laboratory evidence shows that blocking p53 will make many types of cancer, including acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), more sensitive to a variety of established cancer therapeutics while making normal tissues more resistant to the toxic effects of these agents.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This clinical trial is designed to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) in combination with Idarubicin alone or with Cytarabine to either: (1) induce remissions in patients who have previously failed to go into remission in response to chemotherapy; or (2) provide patents who have relapsed after going into a chemotherapy-induced remission with a longer remission.

Cenersen sodium is one of a new class of drugs called antisense oligonucleotides (oligos). Oligos are designed to block the production of specific proteins and thereby inhibit their function. Cenersen sodium targets p53, a widely studied protein.

In cancer, p53 occurs either in the un-mutated ("normal") or mutated forms. The majority of participants in this trial are expected to have un-mutated p53. Cenersen sodium is anticipated to sensitize cancers with un-mutated p53 to most established cancer therapeutics.

p53 has a pivotal role in protecting the body from cells that have suffered genetic damage and, as a result, do not function properly. The protein first senses the level of the damage and then forces the damaged cell to respond to the damage either by repairing itself or committing suicide. In general, the greater the level of damage the more likely the cellular response will be suicide.

Many cancer therapeutics, including both chemotherapy and radiation, cause the types of genetic damage that activate p53 and, consequently, cause either damage repair or cellular suicide. Laboratory studies suggest that cancer cells have a host of defenses that reduce the chances that these cells will respond to genetic damage by committing suicide. So compared to normal cells, cancer cells are more likely to repair the damage caused by cancer therapeutics while normal cells are more likely to commit suicide. Thus, blocking un-mutated p53 is more likely to prevent repair in cancer cells while preventing suicide in normal cells. This provides the basis for a differential effect of cenersen sodium on cancer cells verses normal cells.

When p53-dependent repair is prevented in cancer cells they begin to copy their damaged genetic information in preparation for cell division. This copying of the genetic damage triggers a p53-independent backup suicide mechanism and, as a result, the cancer cells are eliminated. This is the presumed mechanism whereby cenersen sodium is able to sensitize cancer cells with normal p53 function to numerous cancer therapeutics.

At higher doses however, chemotherapy sometimes blocks cells from copying their genes in preparation for division. Thus, it is possible that a chemotherapeutic agent used at a high dose could block any sensitizing effect that cenersen sodium might otherwise have on the cancer.

The chemotherapeutic agent Idarubicin is known to produce the type of genetic damage that effects p53 expression, causes p53-dependent responses and has been shown to be made more effective at killing cancer cells by cenersen sodium. Cytarabine (Ara-C) is the most widely used chemotherapeutic agent for AML. Cenersen sodium does not appear to sensitize cancer cells to Cytarabine and at higher doses Cytarabine may reduce the capacity of cenersen sodium to sensitize cancer cells.

Hence, this AML study will examine the effects of Cenersen sodium used in combination with Idarubicin and one of three different doses of Cytarabine (i.e. 0, 0.1 and 1.0 gm/m2/day), on the responsiveness of participants to these chemotherapeutic agents.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093-0960
        • University of California, San Diego
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami Health Center
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University Medical Center (Siteman Cancer Center)
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
      • Lake Success, New York, United States, 11041
        • North Shore University Hospital
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects with either refractory AML (not achieving a CR after a single course of induction), or relapsed AML that have a CR for less than one year.
  • greater or equal to 18 years old.
  • Life expectancy of more than 4 weeks following initiation of treatment.
  • Performance status (Zubrod) less or equal to 3.
  • Total Bilirubin less or equal to 1.5 x upper normal limit (UNL) unless attributable to organ infiltration by leukemia, and ALT(SGPT) less or equal to 2.5 x UNL.
  • Creatinine less or equal to 1.5 x UNL unless attributable to organ infiltration by leukemia.
  • If plasma creatinine value is borderline, creatinine clearance greater or equal to 60 ml/min (actual or calculated), serum magnesium should be within the normal value.
  • Subjects with liver and/or renal dysfunction due to organ infiltration by leukemia are eligible.
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Volume (LVEF) of >50% as determined by multi-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram.
  • Able to comply with scheduled follow-up and with management of toxicity.
  • Sexually active patients must use an effective method of contraception during the study dosing period. The following are considered acceptable methods of contraception: (i) oral contraceptive pill, (ii) condom, (iii) diaphragm plus spermicide, (iv) patient or partner surgically sterile, (v) patient or partner more than 2 years post-menopausal or (vi) injectable or implantable agent/device.
  • Informed consent form obtained, signed and dated prior to initiation of treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with M3 AML.
  • Subjects receiving other anti-leukemia investigational agents (i.e., unapproved drugs). However, individual cases will be considered on a case-by-case basis for other investigational agents (e.g., antibiotics, antifungals).
  • Pregnant or lactating subjects. Chemotherapy (including hydroxyurea) within three (3) weeks prior to initiation of therapy, unless there is evidence of rapidly progressive disease; then subjects may be enrolled with a minimum of two (2) weeks from previous treatments.

Prohibited Medications during the first week of each course:

  • Acetaminophen
  • Hi-Dose antioxidants (e.g., Vitamins C, E; Multivitamins)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: cenersen, idarubicin
cenersen, idarubicin, no cytarabine
cenersen with standard of care
Other Names:
  • Ol(1)p53
  • EL625
  • Aezea
  • cenersen sodium
standard of care for AML
Other Names:
  • idamycin
Active Comparator: cenersen, idarubicin, cytarabine
cenersen, idarubicin, standard dose cytarabine
cenersen with standard of care
Other Names:
  • Ol(1)p53
  • EL625
  • Aezea
  • cenersen sodium
standard of care for AML
Other Names:
  • idamycin
standard of care Ara-C and High dose Ara-C
Other Names:
  • Ara-C
  • HDAC
Active Comparator: cenersen, idarubicin, HDAC
cenersen, idarubicin, HDAC (high dose cytarabine)
cenersen with standard of care
Other Names:
  • Ol(1)p53
  • EL625
  • Aezea
  • cenersen sodium
standard of care for AML
Other Names:
  • idamycin
standard of care Ara-C and High dose Ara-C
Other Names:
  • Ara-C
  • HDAC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the effective dose of Cytarabine chemotherapy to be used in combination with EL625 and Idarubicin.
Time Frame: 6 months
Cenersen plus standard of care
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the safety profile for the combination of EL625 and Idarubicin +/- Cytarabine.
Time Frame: 6 months
Standard of care plus cenersen
6 months
Determine the Complete Response Rate and Time to Progression.
Time Frame: 6 months
Standard of care plus cenersen
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jorge E Cortes, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Principal Investigator: Edward D. Ball, MD, University of California, San Diego
  • Principal Investigator: John DiPersio, MD, Washington University Medical Center, Siteman Cancer Center
  • Principal Investigator: Maria Baer, Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan Kolitz, MD, FACP, North Shore University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Hugo Fernandez, MD, University of Miami

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2003

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2003

First Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2003

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 18, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Clinical Trials on cenersen

Subscribe