Shared Decision Making: Prostate Cancer Screening

Interventions to Improve Shared Decision-Making: Prostate Cancer Screening is a prospective study of educational interventions to improve the interaction of physicians and their patients about prostate cancer screening. Educational material is provided in primary care practices using either standard paper information or a novel web-based interactive curriculum that explores the risks and benefits of screening measures for prostate cancer for older men. The impact of the intervention on shared decision-making with both actual and standardized patients will be assessed.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Prostate cancer is an important cause of death and disability in US men, but the value of screening for the disease with the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test remains highly controversial. Many primary care physicians use PSA testing routinely, with little patient counseling. Interventions to Improve Shared Decision-Making: Prostate Cancer Screening is a prospective study of educational interventions to improve shared decision-making of physicians and their patients about prostate cancer screening. Physicians will be randomized by practice site to receive standard informational brochures (control group) or a novel web-based interactive curriculum that provides education about prostate cancer screening, including potential benefits and harms, fundamentals of effective patient counsel, and shared decision-making. In addition, patients at intervention sites will be randomized to receive either the brochure or a patient-oriented interactive curriculum covering content similar to that contained in the physician tool. The intervention will be evaluated among 140 physicians within a variety of primary care settings (i.e., University-based clinics, staff-model managed care clinics, and military affiliated outpatient clinics). Approximately 10-15 actual patients of each participating physician will complete a post-visit questionnaire describing their discussion with their doctor about prostate cancer, PSA, and their decision about whether to be screened. Physicians in all groups will also see one unannounced standardized patient (SP) trained to portray a patient interested in discussing PSA. Study groups will be compared on the extent of shared decision-making they engage in with both actual and standardized patients. Pre- and post-study changes in physician knowledge and attitudes about PSA as well as the physicians' pre- and post-study PSA test ordering rates will be ascertained.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

641

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • University of California Davis, Center for Health Services Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physicians in primary care practice settings with male patients age 50-75

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Intervention groups (physician education only, both physician and patient education) vs. control group comparison of physician shared decision-making (SDM) behaviors (self-reported SDM and SDM reported by actual and standardized patients)
Time Frame: study period
study period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
1.Pre- and post-study changes in physician knowledge and attitudes about PSA
Time Frame: study period
study period
2.Pre- and post-study changes in physicians' PSA ordering behavior for their patients age 50-75 years
Time Frame: study period
study period
3.Patients post-visit knowledge and attitudes about PSA
Time Frame: study period
study period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael S Wilkes, MD PhD, University of California, Davis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Shared decision-making for PSA screening tool

3
Subscribe