An Open-label Continuation Trial to Assess the Continued Efficacy and Safety of Ascending Doses of Lacosamide in Subjects With Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain

July 28, 2017 updated by: UCB Pharma
This trial is the follow-on trial to a preceeding open-label trial which included patients with chronic refractory neuropathic pain. It is conducted at one site in the United Kingdom and the patient enrollment is completed. The patients had successfully completed the above mentioned trial and, in the investigator's opinion, would benefit from long-term administration of Lacosamide. After a 1-week run-in phase the patients were uptitrated to their optimal dose and then continued into the maintenance phase. Different pain qualities are assessed by a patient's diary.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is informed and given ample time and opportunity to think about her/his participation in this extension trial and has given her/his written informed consent
  • Subject met all inclusion criteria defined in the SP611 trial with SPM927 at the time of enrollment into trial SP611
  • Subject has successfully completed trial SP611 and, in the investigator's opinion, would benefit from long-term administration of SPM927
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with all trial requirements, including the ability to complete trial questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject previously participated in this trial
  • Subject has participated in another trial of an investigational drug within the last 3 months (excluding trial SP611) or is currently participating in another trial of an investigational drug
  • Subject has had prior therapy with a Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) or Anti-epileptic Drug (AED) within 28 days prior to the Eligibility Visit
  • Subject has evidence or history of significant Cardiovascular Disease within 12 months prior to the Eligibility Visit
  • Subject has laboratory values, which are outside the normal range and judged by the Investigator to be clinically significant
  • Subject has abnormal Renal or Hepatic function
  • Subject has a history of Malignancies with the exception of subjects with a documented disease-free interval of 5 years or more
  • Subject has a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within the last 12 months
  • Subject has any medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could jeopardize or compromise the subject's ability to participate in this continuation trial
  • Subject with a known history of severe Anaphylactic Reaction and/or serious or life threatening Blood Dyscrasias

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Lacosamide
Open-label active treatment

Dosage: Lacosamide up to 400 mg/day;

Dosage form: Film-coated tablets;

Dosage Frequency and Duration: Two times per day; 9.5 years

Other Names:
  • SPM 927
  • Vimpat

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Subjects Reporting At Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During The Treatment Period.
Time Frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 10 years)
From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 10 years)
Number of Subjects Withdrawing From Study Due To A Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During The Treatment Period.
Time Frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 10 years)
From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 10 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Within-Subject Change In Average Daily Pain Score During the Treatment Period.
Time Frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
The Average Daily Pain Score is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Within-Subject Change In The Perception Of Each Of The Individual Cardinal Symptoms of Pain During The Treatment Period - Shooting.
Time Frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Each individual cardinal symptom of pain is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Within-Subject Change In The Perception Of Each Of The Individual Cardinal Symptoms of Pain During The Treatment Period - Burning.
Time Frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Each individual cardinal symptom of pain is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Within-Subject Change In The Perception Of Each Of The Individual Cardinal Symptoms of Pain During The Treatment Period - Paraesthesiae.
Time Frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Each individual cardinal symptom of pain is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Within-Subject Change In The Perception Of Each Of The Individual Cardinal Symptoms of Pain During The Treatment Period - Numbness.
Time Frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Each individual cardinal symptom of pain is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Within-Subject Change In The Perception Of Each Of The Individual Cardinal Symptoms of Pain During The Treatment Period - Allodynia.
Time Frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)

Each individual cardinal symptom of pain is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

Allodynia is defined as neuropathic pain caused by normally innocuous stimuli becoming painful.

From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Subject's Global Impression of Change In Pain During The Treatment Period.
Time Frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)

The Subject's Global Impression of Change is a self-evaluation by the subject of their overall change in relief of neuropathic pain since the beginning of the study rated on a 7-point scale ranging from:

  1. Much better
  2. Moderately better
  3. Mildly better
  4. No change
  5. Mildly worse
  6. Moderately worse
  7. Much worse
From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Investigator's Global Impression of Change In Pain During The Treatment Period.
Time Frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)

The Investigator's Global Impression of Change is a physician's assessment of the patient's overall change in relief of neuropathic pain since the beginning of the study rated on a 7-point scale ranging from:

  1. Much better
  2. Moderately better
  3. Mildly better
  4. No change
  5. Mildly worse
  6. Moderately worse
  7. Much worse
From Baseline Visit to Final Week of Treatment (approximately 9 years)
Percentage of Days With Concomitant Pain ("Rescue") Medications Taken During Baseline Phase.
Time Frame: Baseline Period (approximately 1 week)

The percentage of days where rescue medication was taken is summarized by visit and by Treatment Phase (Baseline, Titration, and Titration + Treatment).

The percentage of days of rescue medication use is defined as the number of days observed within the visit/study phase with rescue medication divided by the number of days in the visit/study phase times 100 for subjects who had taken the rescue medication.

Summary statistics include mean and standard deviation.

Baseline Period (approximately 1 week)
Percentage of Days With Concomitant Pain ("Rescue") Medications Taken During Titration Phase.
Time Frame: Titration Period (approximately 6 weeks)

The percentage of days where rescue medication was taken is summarized by visit and by Treatment Phase (Baseline, Titration, and Titration + Treatment).

The percentage of days of rescue medication use is defined as the number of days observed within the visit/study phase with rescue medication divided by the number of days in the visit/study phase times 100 for subjects who had taken the rescue medication.

Summary statistics include mean and standard deviation.

Titration Period (approximately 6 weeks)
Percentage of Days With Concomitant Pain ("Rescue") Medications Taken During Titration and Treatment Phases.
Time Frame: From Titration Phase through Treatment Phase (approximately 9 years)

The percentage of days where rescue medication was taken is summarized by visit and by Treatment Phase (Baseline, Titration, and Titration + Treatment).

The percentage of days of rescue medication use is defined as the number of days observed within the visit/study phase with rescue medication divided by the number of days in the visit/study phase times 100 for subjects who had taken the rescue medication.

Summary statistics include mean and standard deviation.

From Titration Phase through Treatment Phase (approximately 9 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2001

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 12, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Refractory Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Lacosamide

Subscribe