Pilot Human Lab Study of Lacosamide in Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) (ACGT)

A Pilot Placebo-controlled Human Laboratory Feasibility Study of Lacosamide Effects in Alcohol Use Disorder

The overall goal of the proposed project is to improve the treatment of individuals with AUD. The investigators will conduct the first pilot human laboratory study to assess the effects of two doses of lacosamide on alcohol drinking and craving. The investigators will assess its effects on reducing alcohol intake using a human laboratory method, the Yale Alcohol Drinking Paradigm (ADP). The investigators will also assess the feasibility of the Alcohol Drinking Paradigm (ADP) in order to position our research team to have the capacity to conduct future, larger, hypothesis-testing human laboratory-based experiments designed to test the efficacy of potential alcohol treatments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Four heavy-drinking non-treatment seeking male community volunteers with a diagnosis of AUD will undergo 3 ADP sessions. In each of the 3 ADP sessions, they will receive one of the following 3 different interventions: either 100 mg of lacosamide, 200 mg of lacosamide or placebo.

The ADP session is a one day human laboratory session at the SFVA Medical Center. This human laboratory session involves the self-administration of alcoholic beverages by research participants under highly structured, observed conditions in order to evaluate the effects of the study drug interventions (either 100 mg lacosamide, 200 mg lacosamide, or placebo) on alcohol craving and alcohol consumption. The study follows a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover design in which each participant receives each of the 3 drug interventions in a randomly assigned sequence. There were 4 possible sequences representing the 4 arms of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • San Francisco VA Health Care System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men, ages 21-50;
  2. Able to read English and to complete study evaluations;
  3. Meet DSM-V criteria for current alcohol use disorder (AUD);
  4. Average weekly alcohol use of 25-70 standard drinks for men over the past 30 days;
  5. No more than 3 days/week of alcohol abstinence in the past 30 days, to maximize likelihood that participants will choose to drink during the laboratory sessions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals who are seeking AUD treatment or have been in treatment within the past 6 months;
  2. Current DSM-V non-alcohol use disorder other than tobacco or cannabis;
  3. Positive urine drug test results at more than one baseline appointment for opioids, cocaine, benzodiazepines or barbiturates;
  4. Regular use of psychoactive drugs including antipsychotics, anxiolytics and antidepressants during the 30 days prior to entry, as well as anticonvulsants, beta blockers, central nervous system stimulants or depressants, or other drugs that cause excessive sedation;
  5. Taking medications that may interact with lacosamide, e.g. medications that prolong the ECG PR interval, or medications with strong CYP3A4 and CYP2C9;
  6. Psychosis or any other serious mental illness as judged by SCID and study physician assessment;
  7. Medical conditions that in the judgment of the study physician contraindicate the consumption of alcohol;
  8. Medical conditions that in the judgment of the study physician contraindicate LAC (non contraindications listed in the FDA-approved Prescribing Information for LAC);
  9. Any other medical conditions that in the opinion of the study physician would make study participation hazardous;
  10. History of serious alcohol withdrawal (e.g. seizures, DTs, hospitalization) or a Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Scale (CIWA-AD) score greater than or equal to 8;
  11. Participants who report disliking spirits will be excluded because 80 proof liquor will be provided during the alcohol self-administration periods;
  12. Participants who have taken any investigational drug within 4 weeks preceding study entry;
  13. Participants with first-degree atrioventricular block (AV block), PR interval lengthened beyond 0.20 seconds or greater.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Crossover Sequence A: Placebo, then Lacosamide 200 mg, then Lacosamide 100 mg
Participants receive a single dose of Placebo in ADP Session 1. After a 1 week washout period, they undergo ADP Session 2 in which they receive a single dose of Lacosamide 200 mg. After another 1 week washout period, they undergo ADP Session 3 in which they receive a single dose of Lacosamide 100 mg.
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Placebo capsule identical in appearance to Lacosamide 100 mg and 200 mg capsules.
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Lacosamide 100 mg capsule identical in appearance to Placebo and Lacosamide 200 mg capsule
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Lacosamide 200 mg capsule identical in appearance to Placebo and Lacosamide 100 mg capsules.
Experimental: Crossover Sequence B: Lacosamide 200 mg, then Lacosamide 100 mg, then Placebo
Participants receive a single dose of Lacosamide 200 mg in ADP Session 1. After a 1 week washout period, they undergo ADP Session 2 in which they receive a single dose of Lacosamide 100 mg. After another 1 week washout period, they undergo ADP Session 3 in which they receive a single dose of Placebo.
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Placebo capsule identical in appearance to Lacosamide 100 mg and 200 mg capsules.
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Lacosamide 100 mg capsule identical in appearance to Placebo and Lacosamide 200 mg capsule
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Lacosamide 200 mg capsule identical in appearance to Placebo and Lacosamide 100 mg capsules.
Experimental: Crossover Sequence C: Lacosamide 200 mg, then Placebo, then Lacosamide 100 mg
Participants receive a single dose of Lacosamide 200 mg in ADP Session 1. After a 1 week washout period, they undergo ADP Session 2 in which they receive a single dose of Placebo. After another 1 week washout period, they undergo ADP Session 3 in which they receive a single dose of Lacosamide 100 mg.
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Placebo capsule identical in appearance to Lacosamide 100 mg and 200 mg capsules.
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Lacosamide 100 mg capsule identical in appearance to Placebo and Lacosamide 200 mg capsule
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Lacosamide 200 mg capsule identical in appearance to Placebo and Lacosamide 100 mg capsules.
Experimental: Crossover Sequence D: Lacosamide 100 mg, then Lacosamide 200 mg, then Placebo
Participants receives a single dose of Lacosamide 100 mg in ADP Session 1. After a 1 week washout period, they undergo ADP Session 2 in which they receive a single dose of Lacosamide 200 mg. After another 1 week washout period, they undergo ADP Session 3 in which they receive a single dose of Placebo.
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Placebo capsule identical in appearance to Lacosamide 100 mg and 200 mg capsules.
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Lacosamide 100 mg capsule identical in appearance to Placebo and Lacosamide 200 mg capsule
Oral medication
Other Names:
  • Lacosamide 200 mg capsule identical in appearance to Placebo and Lacosamide 100 mg capsules.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment Feasibility (Time, in Months,) Required to Recruit, Screen and Conduct the Study Procedures
Time Frame: 7 months
Recruitment feasibility will be measured as the time (in months) required to recruit, screen and conduct the study procedures for a total of 4 participants.
7 months
Retention Feasibility (Proportion of Participants Completing the Alcohol Drinking Paradigm (ADP) Sessions)
Time Frame: 6.5 weeks
Retention feasibility will be measured by the proportion of participants completing the Alcohol Drinking Paradigm (ADP) Sessions 1, 2 and 3.
6.5 weeks
Tolerability (Number of Participants With Mild, Moderate, or Severe Adverse Events)
Time Frame: 3 days (1 day each for ADP Session 1, 2, and 3)
Tolerability will be measured by the number of participants with mild, moderate, and severe adverse events for each of the 3 drug interventions (100 mg lacosamide, 200 mg lacosamide and placebo).
3 days (1 day each for ADP Session 1, 2, and 3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alcohol Craving
Time Frame: 3 days (1 day each for ADP Session 1, 2, and 3. Each ADP Session included 1 dose of the drug intervention, either Placebo, Lacosamide 100 mg, or Lacosamide 200 mg).
Alcohol craving will be measured during Alcohol Drinking Paradigm (ADP) sessions 1, 2 and 3 using the total score of the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ has 8 items. Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale (Strongly Disagree = 1 and Strongly Agree = 7; items 2 and 7 are reverse scored). Higher scores reflect greater craving. Total score range is from a minimum of 8 to a maximum of 56. The AUQ is administered before study medication and at various times after study medication. The AUQ score reported here is the highest AUQ score following administration of study medication.
3 days (1 day each for ADP Session 1, 2, and 3. Each ADP Session included 1 dose of the drug intervention, either Placebo, Lacosamide 100 mg, or Lacosamide 200 mg).
Alcohol Consumption (Number of Standard Drinks Consumed)
Time Frame: 3 days (1 day each for ADP Session 1, 2, and 3. Each ADP Session included 1 dose of the drug intervention, either Placebo, Lacosamide 100 mg, or Lacosamide 200 mg).
Alcohol consumption is measured during each of the Alcohol Drinking Paradigm (ADP) sessions, 1, 2 and 3. In each session participants received one of the 3 drug interventions, Placebo, Lacosamide 100 mg, or Lacosamide 200 mg. Consumption was measured using the number of alcoholic standard drinks consumed during the ADP sessions. A standard drink per NIAAA definition is 14 grams of pure alcohol.
3 days (1 day each for ADP Session 1, 2, and 3. Each ADP Session included 1 dose of the drug intervention, either Placebo, Lacosamide 100 mg, or Lacosamide 200 mg).
Subjective Effects of Alcohol Consumption
Time Frame: 3 days (1 day each for ADP Session 1, 2, and 3. Each ADP Session included 1 dose of the drug intervention, either Placebo, Lacosamide 100 mg, or Lacosamide 200 mg).
Subjective effects of alcohol consumption are measured during the Alcohol Drinking Paradigm (ADP) sessions 1, 2 and 3 using the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES), which has 2 subscales; the Stimulation Subscale range is 0 - 70, where 0 is the least and 70 is the greatest stimulation; the Sedation Subscale range is 0 - 70, where 0 is the least and 70 is the greatest sedation. The BAES was administered both before and at various timepoints after study medication administration in each of the ADP sessions. The BAES scores reported here are the peak Stimulation scores after medication administration and peak Sedation scores after medication administration for each of ADP sessions 1, 2 and 3.
3 days (1 day each for ADP Session 1, 2, and 3. Each ADP Session included 1 dose of the drug intervention, either Placebo, Lacosamide 100 mg, or Lacosamide 200 mg).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steven L. Batki, MD, UCSF/SFVAHCS/NCIRE

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe