Compaction Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Bilateral

December 16, 2020 updated by: Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark

Compaction THA Bilateral

This is a prospective, randomized study comparing two different bone preparation techniques for insertion of a porous coated titanium cementless femoral stem. Patients receiving a bilateral total hip replacement are randomized to conventional broaching on one side and compaction on the other side.

Hypothesis: Compaction results in significantly less stem migration [evaluated by radiostereometric analysis (RSA)], less peri-prosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) loss [evaluated by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)], and a higher Harris hip score after two years.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
    • Aalborg
      • Aalborg And Farsø, Aalborg, Denmark, 8000
        • Northern Orthopaedic Division

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with primary arthritis in the hip
  • Patients with sufficient bone density to allow uncemented implantation of a femoral component
  • Informed patient consent in writing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with neuromuscular or vascular disease in the affected leg
  • Patients found upon operation to be unsuited for uncemented acetabulum component
  • Patients who regularly take non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cannot interrupt intake for the postoperative phase of the study
  • Patients with fracture sequelae
  • Female patients of childbearing capacity
  • Hip joint dysplasia
  • Sequelae to previous hip joint disorder in childhood.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Compaction
Compaction technique for femoral bone preparation prior to cementless femoral stem insertion.
Procedure: Bone preparation technique: compaction
Other Names:
  • No other names.
Active Comparator: Broaching
Broaching technique for femoral bone preparation prior to cementless femoral stem insertion.
Procedure: Bone preparation technique: broaching
Other Names:
  • No other names.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiostereometric analysis
Time Frame: 5 and 10 years follow-up
Stem subsidence (change) at 5 and 10 years measured with radiostereometric analysis
5 and 10 years follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Periprosthetic bone mineral density
Time Frame: 5 years follow-up
Periprosthetic bone mineral density measured with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
5 years follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 years follow-up
Questionnaire of hip function
5 years follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Northern Orthopaedic Division, Denmark

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Søren Kold, MD, Northern Orthopaedic Division

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

April 25, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ON-04-002b-SKO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coxarthrosis

Clinical Trials on Bone preparation technique: compaction

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Equatorial Guinea

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe