Enteral Glutamine in Critical Illness

March 10, 2008 updated by: Christiana Care Health Services

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Enteral Glutamine Supplementation to Standard of Care Enteral Feeding in Critical Illness

Glutamine is an amino acid which is rapidly depleted in critical illness. It is used as energy by cells that line the gut, vital for immune system function, and works as an anti-oxidant. Glutamine supplementation has been shown to improve outcomes in ICU patients. We hypothesize that critically ill patients given extra glutamine will have less of an inflammatory response and therefore better outcomes than patients not given extra glutamine. Our study randomizes patients to tube feeding with OR without extra glutamine to see if it affects patient outcomes as well as markers of inflammation.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Glutamine, a nonessential amino acid, is preferred fuel for rapidly proliferating cells in human body. Those cells include the enterocytes in small intestine, lymphocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts. Glutamine also transports nitrogen between tissues and serves as a precursor to glutathione which is a potent antioxidant. A healthy human body contains abundant glutamine, either from diet or from skeletal muscle tissue that synthesizes it.

During critical illness the demand for glutamine is increased. Rapid depletion of glutamine stores in critically ill patients has been described and correlated to increased mortality. Glutamine depletion may be deleterious in critical illness because of adverse effects on the essential functions mentioned above. For example glutamine depletion may cause gut mucosal barrier function to deteriorate, leading to bacterial translocation and enhanced systemic inflammatory response with increased risk for multisystem organ failure. Clinical trials performed in a wide range of patients with serious illness, including cancer, trauma, burn, major surgery and critical illness, have demonstrated possible benefits of glutamine supplementation. Interpretation of the results of multiple studies is made difficult based on differences in glutamine dosing, route of administration, population studied, and endpoints used.

Blood volume analysis has been shown to be a good measure of capillary leak. The DAXOR blood volume analyzer kit was recently approved by the FDA for blood volume analyses and also has the capacity of measuring capillary permeability by looking at the slope of albumin transudation. It is a simpler way to measure capillary permeability than other methods described.

Reviewing the previous study results, glutamine supplementation in parental form and with higher dose in various patient populations has shown evidence of being beneficial. Studies of enteral glutamine therapy have also showed benefits, but results are less consistent possibly because of the heterogeneous study methodology described above. Moreover, most of the studies are carried out in burn patients and surgical patients; there were few studies in critical ill medical patients. Finally no study has specifically looked at the mechanism via which glutamine has conferred protection.

Comparison: Critically ill patients given enteral tube feeds compared to critically ill patients given enteral tube feeds with supplemental glutamine.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19713
        • Christiana Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission to MICU/ CICU
  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years old
  • Requirement for enteral nutrition
  • Presence or planned insertion of central venous catheter as part of routine medical care
  • Requirement for mechanical ventilation
  • APACHE II Score >/= 15

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female of child-bearing age (i.e. less than 45 years old)
  • Enteral nutrition begun prior to randomization
  • Receiving Total Parenteral Nutrition
  • Requirement for protein restriction
  • Creatinine >4 mg/dl
  • History of cirrhosis and/or clinical signs of heptic encephalopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: A
Will receive enteral glutamine
Group A patients will receive 0.5g/kg/day of enteral glutamine daily while they are receiving tube feeds or at the end of 28 days (whichever comes first)
NO_INTERVENTION: B
No enteral glutamine given

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Number of Ventilator Days
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Number of days receiving antibiotics
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in APACHE Score
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours
Change in Number of SIRS Criteria
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours
Change in Capillary Leak as measured by blood volume analysis
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours
Change in CRP
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours
Correlation between capillary permeability and APACHE Score
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours
Correlation between capillary permeability and Mortality
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael DePietro, M.D.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2007

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 26, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 13, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2008

Last Verified

March 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Glutamine

3
Subscribe