Intravenous Isosorbide Dinitrate Versus Sublingual Isosorbide Dinitrate for the Relief of Acute Anginal Episodes in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Patients

January 27, 2010 updated by: Soroka University Medical Center
This is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study, clinical trail designed to evaluate the efficacy safety and superiority of intravenous boluses of isosorbide dinitrate for the relief of acute anginal pain episodes in acute coronary syndrome patients in comparison with the usual manner of S/L isosorbide dinitrate .

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Detailed Description

Analgesia is an important element in the management of ACS patients. Pain contributes to the heightened sympathetic activity that is particularly prominent during periods of acute STEMI, NSTEMI and unstable angina and consequentially causes elevation of tissue oxygen demand. Control of cardiac pain is typically accomplished with a combination of oxygen, analgesic (e.g. morphine) beta blockers agents and primarily nitrates.

Sublingual nitrates are currently the guidelines recommended preparation for instant relief of brief episodes of pain. In patients with prolonged periods of waxing and waning chest pain, drip of intravenous nitrates may be of benefit in controlling of symptoms and correcting ischemia.

Intravenous nitrates are also indicated for the treatment of acute decompensated CHF patients with pulmonary edema, nevertheless the current treatment for these patients edema is repeated intravenous boluses of and not sublingual isosorbide dinitrate, followed by continuous drip. Although there is no hard data on intravenous high-dose nitrates for the relief of acute anginal pain episodes, our clinical impression with this method is excellent.

Intravenous boluses of isosorbide dinitrate in a hospital setting provides immediate, accurate (bioavailability ) and is an easily controlled modality for providing nitrates.

Since intravenous boluses of isosorbide dinitrate is the standard care for acute anginal pain episodes in our ICCU at this time, a well designed comparative study for the two methods would help it to become a guideline and not a matter of choice in these cases.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beer Sheva, Israel
        • Intensive Cardiac Care Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18 years or older.
  2. Admission to the ICCU with ACS (non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome or 24 hours after ST elevation myocardial infarction) .
  3. Presence of ischemic symptoms (≥5 minutes) during hospitalization.
  4. Pain assessment of 3 out of 10 on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 1 or dynamic ECG findings (ST segment deviation ≥0.05 mV or T wave inversion ≥ 0.3 mV)
  5. Willing and able to provide written informed consent according to the regulations of the Ministry of Health and the Helsinki committee instructions.

    -

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient who meet any of the following criteria are excluded from the study:
  2. Persistent ST-segment elevation ≥ 1 mV in 2 or more contiguous leads or new LBBB.
  3. Acute pulmonary edema
  4. Sepsis
  5. Sustained systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg or evidence of cardiogenic shock
  6. Pregnant women
  7. Use at randomization of agents known to enhance the efficacy of nitrates.
  8. Clinically significant aortic stenosis
  9. Cr > 2 mg/dL
  10. Participation in another trial of an investigational drug or device on randomization.
  11. Allergy or sensitivity to nitatrate compounds
  12. Acute episode of cerebrovascular attack
  13. Inability to comply with the protocol and follow-up

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: doron zahger, prof, soroka university medical center israel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2007

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2010

Last Verified

January 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on iso sorbide dinitrate iv bolus or s/l

Subscribe