Effectiveness of Protected Environment Rooms for AML and MDS

August 1, 2012 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Effectiveness of HEPA-filtered Rooms ("Protected Environment") to Prevent Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Age >/ = 60 Receiving Lower Intensity ("Targeted") Therapy for Untreated AML and High-risk Myelodysplasia (MDS)

The goal of this clinical research study is to learn if the "protected environment" (PE) can help to prevent infections in patients aged 60 and above who are receiving what is considered low-intensity treatment for newly-diagnosed AML or high-risk MDS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For AML or high-risk MDS, it has been common practice for patients aged 50 and older to receive initial treatment in the PE at M. D. Anderson. The PE is a series of rooms containing a special air-flow system that is designed to filter out germs that can cause serious infection. Patients stay in a PE room, without leaving, for up to 5 weeks. In an attempt to keep a PE room germ-free, only the medical staff is allowed in the room. Family and visitors can see the patient, but are separated from the patient by a glass wall. Each PE room has a laptop computer that can be connected to the internet. Books, newspapers, and various other materials are only allowed in the PE room after they have been sterilized for safety reasons.

Therapy given to patients with AML or MDS has recently changed from higher (which usually meant that there was more possibility for infections and a need for hospitalization) to lower intensity. Because the value of the PE was already established in patients receiving higher-intensity therapy, researchers want to learn about the value of the PE in patients receiving lower-intensity therapy.

If you agree to take part in this study, you will be randomly assigned (as in the flip of a coin) to 1 of 2 groups. You will have an equal chance of being in either one of the groups. Participants in one group will be placed in the PE. Participants in the other group will not be placed in the PE but will have outpatient care. After the first 30 participants have been assigned to one group or the other, the chances of future participants being assigned to the PE will depend on the results (rates of infection) seen in earlier participants.

If you are assigned to the PE, you will stay in the PE for 5 weeks after beginning your standard treatment. You will be removed from the PE if medical problems develop that require you to receive treatment somewhere else in the hospital or if staying in the PE is simply too difficult (such as because of claustrophobia [fear of being in a closed space] or because of a feeling of "home sickness" [a strong desire to have physical contact with family and friends]).

If you are not assigned to the PE, you will be asked to stay in Houston for 5 weeks and will receive treatment on an outpatient basis, unless you have problems that require hospitalization (not in the PE).

You may choose not to be assigned to either group. If this is the case, the study doctor or study staff will ask you to participate in this study through allowing your data (information) to be collected.

If you choose not to be assigned and you agree, study staff will collect data regarding your rates of infections and remission (inactive disease) and the status of your health over time so that this information can be compared with rates seen in patients who took part in 1 of the 2 groups. This comparison information will be used to learn the value of the PE in patients receiving lower-intensity therapy. Up to 125 patients will take part in this study. All will be enrolled at M. D. Anderson.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • UT MD Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with AML or high-risk MDS Age >/= 60 years with a Zubrod performance status of 0,1, or 2

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • AML or high-risk MDS (> 10% blasts in the marrow or blood)
  • Patient is to be given "targeted therapy". Examples of targeted therapies are tipifarnib + low-dose ara-C, decitabine, and 5 azacitidine + valproic acid.
  • Age >/= 60 years and Zubrod performance status of 0,1, or 2
  • Informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cannot receive ara-C at a dose >/= 100 mg/m2 daily, anthracyclines, or cloretazine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Protective environment
Participants in a Protective environment
Not a protective environment
Participants not in a protective environment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success Rate
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 weeks post randomization to PE or Non PE
Success is defined as number of participants with no death, pneumonia, or sepsis within 6 weeks of randomization compared to total number of participants to evaluate effect of the protected environment (PE) by (adaptively) randomly assigning patients age >/= 60 given targeted therapies between treatment inside or outside the PE.
Baseline to 6 weeks post randomization to PE or Non PE

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gloria N. Mattiuzzi, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 2, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2012

Last Verified

August 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndrome

3
Subscribe