Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System Versus Conservative Care

December 6, 2018 updated by: Medtronic Spinal and Biologics

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Clinical Investigation of DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System in the treatment of moderate single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This pivotal clinical trial is being conducted to evaluate the DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System for the treatment of single-level moderate lumbar degenerative disc disease. The implant under investigation in this clinical trial is the DIAM Spinal Stabilization System, and the device will be implanted using a posterior surgical approach. Patients in the control group will receive nonoperative treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

311

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
        • Spine Institute of Arizona
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Tower Orthopaedic & Neurosurgical Spine Institute
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90036
        • Los Angeles Brain and Spine Institute
      • Mission Viejo, California, United States, 92691
        • Neurological Surgery
      • San Bernardino, California, United States, 92408
        • Loma Linda Orthopaedic Dept
    • Colorado
      • Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80304
        • Boulder Neurosurgical Associates
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates
    • Florida
      • Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32308
        • Tallahassee Neurological Clinic
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33637
        • Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (FORE)
    • Georgia
      • Athens, Georgia, United States, 30606
        • Georgia Neurological Surgery
    • Illinois
      • Oak Park, Illinois, United States, 60302
        • Dr. Sokolowski
    • Indiana
      • Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46032
        • Indiana Spine Group
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46804
        • Fort Wayne Orthopaedics
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
        • OrthoIndy
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States
        • Precision Spine and Orthopaedic Specialists
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States
        • Kansas Joint & Spine Institute
    • Massachusetts
      • Peabody, Massachusetts, United States, 01960
        • Sports Medicine North Orthopaedic Surgery, Inc.
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • University Physicians Group
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55404
        • Twin Cities Spine Center
    • Missouri
      • Chesterfield, Missouri, United States, 63017
        • The Orthopedic Center of St. Louis
    • Ohio
      • Kettering, Ohio, United States, 45429
        • Advanced Neurosurgery Inc. / Kettering Medical Center
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Neurospine Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17601
        • Argires, Becker, Marotti, & Westphal Brain, Orthopedic/Sports Medicine & Spine Care
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57105
        • Orthopedic Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
        • Spine Specialty Center
    • Texas
      • Plano, Texas, United States
        • Neurospine Surgical Consultants
      • Southlake, Texas, United States
        • Spine Team Texas
    • Utah
      • Sandy, Utah, United States, 84070
        • The Smart Clinic
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Each patient participating in this clinical trial must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:

  1. Has moderate low back pain secondary to lumbar degenerative disc disease at a single level from L2 - L5. Low back pain is defined as persistent back pain, with or without radicular pain, with current episode of less than one year duration. Degenerative disc disease is confirmed by patient history, physical examination, and radiographic studies with one or more of the following factors (as measured radiographically by MRI scans or x-rays):

    • Decreased disc height >2mm, compared to the disc space at the next adjacent (superior or inferior, whichever has greater disc height) spinal level;
    • Scarring/thickening of the ligamentum flavum, annulus fibrosis, or facet joint capsule;
    • Herniated nucleus pulposus.
  2. Is 18-70 years of age, inclusive, and is skeletally mature.
  3. Has pre-treatment Oswestry score ≥ 30.
  4. Has pre-treatment back pain score of ≥ 8 based on the Pre-Treatment Back and Leg Pain Questionnaire (Back Pain Intensity + Back Pain Frequency).
  5. Has been treated nonoperatively (e.g. bed rest, physical therapy, medications, TENS, manipulation, and/or spinal injections) for a period of at least 6 weeks and not more than 6 months prior to enrollment in the clinical study.
  6. If of child-bearing potential, patient is not pregnant or nursing and agrees not to become pregnant during the study period.
  7. Is willing and able to participate in either of the randomized treatments for the duration of the study follow-up period. If the patient is randomized to the investigational group, he/she is willing to undergo surgery and receive the DIAM device. If the patient is randomized to the control group, he/she is willing to undergo all four nonoperative treatments.
  8. Is willing and able to comply with the study plan and able to understand and sign the Patient Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria:

A patient meeting any of the following criteria is to be excluded from this clinical trial:

  1. Has disc height loss > 67% at the involved level, compared to the next adjacent (superior or inferior, whichever has greater disc height) spinal level
  2. Has Arachnoiditis.
  3. Has a primary diagnosis of a spinal disorder other than degenerative disc disease at the involved level.
  4. Requires treatment of degenerative disc disease at more than one lumbar level.
  5. Has had all of the following nonoperative treatments (prescribed medications, active physical therapy, spinal injections, and patient education) within the past 6 weeks.
  6. Has a sequestered herniated nucleus pulposus.
  7. Has had any previous surgery at the involved or adjacent spinal levels (including procedures such as rhizotomy).
  8. Has received any intradiskal ablation therapy, such as IDET.
  9. Has congenital or iatrogenic posterior element insufficiency (e.g. facet resection, spondylolysis, pars fracture, or Spinal Bifida Occulta).
  10. Has back pain (with or without leg, buttock, or groin pain) that is not alleviated in any spinal position.
  11. Has a motor deficit of the lower extremity.
  12. Has cauda equina syndrome.
  13. Has compression of nerve roots with neurogenic bowel (fecal incontinence) or bladder (urinary retention or incontinence) dysfunction.
  14. Has been previously diagnosed with clinically significant peripheral neuropathy.
  15. Has significant vascular disease causing vascular claudication.
  16. Has a medical contraindication that prevents the patient from receiving spinal injections (i.e., allergy to contrast media used to aid in placement of the needle in the epidural space).
  17. Has ventral spondylolisthesis with more than 2 mm of translation at the involved level.
  18. Has evidence of prior fracture or trauma to the L1, L2, L3, L4, or L5 levels in either compression or burst.
  19. Has lumbar scoliosis with a Cobb angle of greater than 15°.
  20. Has lumbar kyphosis or flat back syndrome.
  21. Has sustained a hip fracture within the last year.
  22. Has any of the following (if "Yes" to any of the below risk factors, a lumbar spine DEXA Scan will be required to determine eligibility.):

    1. Previous diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteopenia, or osteomalacia.
    2. Postmenopausal Non-Black female over 60 years of age who weighs less than 140 pounds.
    3. Postmenopausal female who has sustained a non-traumatic hip, spine or wrist fracture.
    4. Male over the age of 60 who has sustained a non-traumatic hip or spine fracture.

    If the level of DEXA T-score is -1.0 or lower (i.e., -1.5, -2.0, etc.), the patient is excluded from the study.

  23. Has obesity defined by BMI greater than or equal to 40. (Refer to the BMI Table provided in the CIP.)
  24. Has a documented allergy to silicone, polyethylene, titanium, or latex.
  25. Has overt or active bacterial infection, either local or systemic, and/or potential for bacteremia.
  26. Has a suppressed immune system or has taken steroids at any dose daily for more than one month within the last year (excluding low dose inhalers for the treatment of asthma).
  27. Has a history of autoimmune disease.
  28. Has presence of active malignancy or prior history of malignancy within the last 5 years (except for basal cell carcinoma of the skin).
  29. Has presence or prior history of a spinal malignancy.
  30. Has chronic or acute renal and/or hepatic failure or prior history of renal and/or hepatic parenchymal disease.
  31. Has any disease (e.g., neuromuscular disease) that would preclude accurate clinical evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the treatment regimens in this study.
  32. Has received treatment with an investigational therapy (device and/or pharmaceutical) within 30 days prior to entering the study or such treatment is planned during the 24 months following enrollment in the study.
  33. Has an implantable metal device (e.g., stimulator, pacemaker) and is unable to have an MRI.
  34. Is an alcohol and/or drug abuser, as defined by currently undergoing treatment for alcohol and/or drug abuse.
  35. Is mentally incompetent. If questionable, obtain psychiatric consult.
  36. Has a Waddell Signs of Inorganic Behavior score of 3 or greater.
  37. Is a prisoner.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DIAM™ spinal stabilization system
Implantation of the DIAM Spinal Stabilization System
Surgical procedure with implantation of the Investigational device
Active Comparator: Conservative care
Conservative Care
Six months of conservative care, to include: patient education, medications, physical therapy and spinal injections.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Success
Time Frame: 12 months

A patient will be considered an overall success if all of the following conditions are met:

  1. Pain/disability (Oswestry) success;
  2. No serious adverse event classified as "implant associated", "implant-/surgical procedure associated", or "nonoperative treatment associated"; and
  3. For patients in the investigational group, no additional surgical procedure at the involved level classified as a failure. For patients in the control group, no "treatment surgery" at the involved level that was the result of a poor response to conservative care treatment.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain/Disability Status
Time Frame: 12 months

The self-administered Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire will be used. Success will be defined as pain/disability improvement according to the following definition:

Pre-treatment Score - Post-treatment Score ≥ 15

12 months
Neurological Status
Time Frame: 12 months
Neurological status is based on four types of measurements: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising. Each of the sections is comprised of a number of elements. Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections ( motor, sensory, reflex, and straightleg raising ) for the time period evaluated.
12 months
Pain Status (Back Pain and Leg Pain)
Time Frame: 12 months
Numerical rating scales will be used to evaluate pain intensity and duration. The pain score (0 min, 20 Max) is derived by adding the numerical rating scores from the pain intensity (0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be.") and duration scales (0-10, with a score of 0 being "pain none of the time" and a score of 10 being "pain all of the time"). Success for back pain and leg pain is described as follows: Pre-treatment Score - Post-treatment Score >0
12 months
General Health Status
Time Frame: 12 months

The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) will be used to assess general health status. The SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) measures a patient's physical wellbeing and will be calculated according to algorithms formulated by the Medical Outcomes Trust. To be classified as a success, the following criterion must be met for SF-36 PCS:

PCSPost-tx - PCSPre-tx >= 0

12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DIAM™ Device vs. Cons. Care

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

Clinical Trials on DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System

3
Subscribe