- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05569967
COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF TELEREHABILITATION AND FACE-TO-FACE SPINAL STABILIZATION TRAININGS ON GAIT BIOMECHANICS, BALANCE AND JOINT POSITION SENSE IN TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTEES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED, SINGLE BLIND STUDY
December 24, 2024 updated by: Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
After transtibial amputations, biomechanical changes in the trunk, pelvis, and lumbar region cause asymmetrical strength and core muscle activation on the amputated side, which negatively affects the gait biomechanics of individuals.
However, routine treatment programs do not use treatment approaches based on the core region.
This study will focus on the effects of telerehabilitation and face-to-face spinal stabilization exercise training on gait, balance, joint position sense, core muscle function, and perceived mobility in transtibial amputees, after treatment, and after long-term follow-up.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
28
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey
- Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who use total contact sockets
- have been using prostheses for at least 1 year,
- can walk independently without a walking aid
- functionally at least K2
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bilateral amputation
- Upper extremity amputation
- Neurological problems
- Other orthopedic problems
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group 1
Individuals in this group will receive spinal stabilization training through telerehabilitation.
|
Individuals in both groups will receive spinal stabilization training 3 times a week for 8 weeks.
|
|
Active Comparator: Group 2
Individuals in this group will receive spinal stabilization training face-to-face.
|
Individuals in both groups will receive spinal stabilization training 3 times a week for 8 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
gait speed
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
Participants will be asked to walk on flat ground for 10 meters.
At this time, the speed will be evaluated by the BTS G-Walk sensor.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
spatial parameter of gait
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
Participants will be asked to walk on flat ground for 10 meters.
At this time, the spatial variable of gait will be evaluated by the BTS G-Walk sensor.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
temporal parameter of gait
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
Participants will be asked to walk on flat ground for 10 meters.
At this time, the temporal variable of gait will be evaluated by the BTS G-Walk sensor.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Dynamic Balance
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
Dynamic balance; will be evaluated with the "Four Square Step Test", which is a valid and reliable measure in the evaluation of gait, mobility and dynamic balance.
The time to complete four frames is recorded.
If the duration is more than 24 seconds, it is considered that there is a risk of falling.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Balance confidence
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
Balance confidence of individuals will be evaluated with the "Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scale".
On this scale, individuals score their balance confidence between 0% and 100% during various ambulatory activities.
A mean score of 50% or less indicates low physical function, 50-80% indicates moderate physical function, and 80% or higher indicates high physical function.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Core Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
The strength of the core muscles will be evaluated using "The Stabilizer Pressure Biofeedback Unit".
The pressure values for the measurement will be recorded 3 times in a row, at the beginning and end of the 10-second contraction, and the average value will be taken.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Core Muscle Endurance- Trunk Flexor
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
The trunk flexor test will be performed with the arms crossed over the thorax, the trunk at 55 degrees of flexion, and the knees and hips flexed to 90 degrees.
The test will be finished when the participant is unable to maintain the position.
The time will be recorded.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Core Muscle Endurance- Trunk Extansor
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
The trunk extensor test will be performed in the prone position, with the pelvis, hips and knees fixed to the bed.
The participant will be asked to cross his arms over his body and position his body horizontally.
The test will be finished when the participant is unable to maintain the horizontal position.
The time will be recorded.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Core Muscle Endurance- Side Bridge
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
While the participants are in the side-lying position, they will raise their hips and align their bodies in a straight line by getting support from their feet and elbows.
The time will be recorded by asking them to maintain the position as much as possible.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Perceived Mobility
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) Short Form will be used.
The questionnaire consists of a total of 12 items, each of which is evaluated over 0-5 points.
All items evaluate the degree of ability of the individual to perform the activity rather than the actual performance of the individual, and reflect the difficulty experienced by the individual while performing the activity.
Higher scores indicate better mobility.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Joint Position Sense-Knee
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
It will be evaluated with a dual digital inclinometer (ACUMAR™).While the participants are in the prone position, the inclinometer will be placed on the femur and fibula and they will be asked to flex the knee at 40 degrees.
It will be asked to feel the angle completely by keeping it in this position for a certain period of time and then return to the neutral position.
The patient will then be asked to find the target angle.
The difference between the target angle and the obtained angle will be determined as an absolute value and recorded in degrees.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Joint Position Sense-Trunk
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
It will be evaluated with a dual digital inclinometer (ACUMAR™).
The test will be performed in a standing position with eyes closed, barefoot on a hard floor, with the support surface shoulder-width apart.
The inclinometer will be fixed on the T1 and S1 spinous processes and 30 degrees of trunk flexion will be required.
It will be asked to feel the angle completely by keeping it in this position for a certain period of time and then return to the neutral position.
The patient will then be asked to find the target angle.
The difference between the target angle and the obtained angle will be determined as an absolute value and recorded in degrees.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
pelvic parameter of gait
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
Participants will be asked to walk on flat ground for 10 meters.
At this time, the pelvic parameter of gait will be evaluated by the BTS G-Walk sensor.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Step symmetry
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
The time-distance characteristics of the gait will be used to calculate the gait symmetry.
The step time of the non-amputee will be calculated in proportion to the amputated side.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
|
Stance symmetry
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
The time-distance characteristics of the gait will be used to calculate the gait symmetry.
The stance time of the non-amputee will be calculated in proportion to the amputated side.
|
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 5 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 25, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 30, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
March 30, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 4, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
October 6, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 24, 2024
Last Verified
December 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022-986/12
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Amputation
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabUniversity of AlbertaActive, not recruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, Traumatic | Amputation; Traumatic, LimbUnited States
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedAmputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, CongenitalUnited States
-
Boninger, Michael, MDNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Ripple Therapeutics...RecruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, HandUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the WristUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityRecruitingEvaluation of Functionality of Amputees According to the Medicare Functional K Classification SystemAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerTurkey
-
Point DesignsEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAmputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, CongenitalUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabRecruitingAmputation | Amputation, Traumatic | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb | Amputation of KneeUnited States
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Traumatic Amputations | Leg AmputationItaly
Clinical Trials on Spinal stabilization training through telerehabilitation
-
Izmir Katip Celebi UniversityDokuz Eylul UniversityCompleted
-
Hacettepe UniversityThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of TurkeyCompletedTemporomandibular Joint Disorders | Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome | Temporomandibular Disorder | Temporomandibular Joint Pain | Manual Therapy | Temporomandibular Joint Disc DisplacementTurkey
-
Hacettepe UniversityKarabuk UniversityCompletedTemporomandibular Disorders | Temporomandibular Joint Disorders | Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome | Temporomandibular Disorder | Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction | Manual Therapy | Core Stabilization Exercise TherapyTurkey
-
Özel Artı Disleksi Özel Eğitim ve Rehabilitasyon...Not yet recruiting
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUnknownThe Rehabilitation Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. A Prospective Randomized StudySpinal InstabilityTaiwan
-
Izmir Katip Celebi UniversityDokuz Eylul UniversityCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting
-
Health Education Research Foundation (HERF)CompletedMechanical Low Back PainPakistan
-
Hacettepe UniversityRecruiting
-
Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityCompletedChronic Low-back PainTurkey