- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00457093
A Comparison Between Glargine and Detemir Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes
November 17, 2010 updated by: Diabetes Care Center
A Double Blind, Randomized, Parallel, Cross-Over Comparision of Glycemic Control Achieved With Once a Day Insulin Glargine Versus Detemir in Type 2 Diabetes
The purpose of this study that when studies using our method of dosing adjustments driven by continuous glucose monitoring and because of the less variable glycemic effect of insulin detemir, insulin detemir treated subjects will spend a significantly greater time in the glucose target range than insulin glargine.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Todate, most studies have compared insulin detemir and glargine to NPH and not to each other.
Depending of their design, these studies have shown both insulins lower the fasting glucose, A1c, the incidence of hypoglycemia and are associated with less weight gain than NPH.
In the only direct comparison study of these two basal insulins, insulin detemir demonstrated significantly less day to day variation than glargine as measured by glucose infusion rated during an euglycemic clamp study.
Given the same incidence of hypoglycemia, this last study would suggest that insulin detemir treatment could achieve target glucose control more than glargine.
We have used continuous glucose monitoring (CGMS) extensively in our practice.
CGMS is arguably the most sensitive method for detecting differences in glycemic control in the outpatient setting and there by allowing fine adjustments in insulin treatment.
When comparing insulin glargine to preprogrammable basal insulin as delivered by continuous subcutaneous infusion and using CGMS, we have shown significantly better glucose control with continuous subcutaneous infusion, We have also developed a method of daily insulin dosage adjustments during a continuous CGMS study from daily glucose tracings downloaded.
This allows for an even more accurate basal insulin replacement per set glycemic goal.
This protocol addresses a comparison of insulin glargine and insulin detemir for patients evaluated by CGMS.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
35
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Salinas, California, United States, 93901
- Diabetes Care Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Currently on a basal insulin, that is, NPH, glargine or detemir
- Capable of self monitoring glucose >4/day
- Previously complaint with clinical recommendations
- Subject may be on oral antiglycemic medications but no change in treatment is permitted during study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hb A1c >9.0%
- Urinary ketosis
- Currently or expected alteration in insulin sensitivity such as major surgery, infection, renal failure (creatine >1.5 mg/dL) glucocorticoid treatment, recent (within 2 weeks) serious hypoglycaemic episode (requires assistance of another)
- Currently participating in another clinical trial
- Known or suspected allergy to insulin glargine or detemir
- Using other insulins, such as, bolus insulin or premixed insulin
- Sight or hearing impaired
- Pregnancy oor nursing of the intention of becoming pregnant or not using adequate contraceptive measures.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
---|
In the time period 2400 to 0600 hours (the Basal Period) when post-meal food is least likely to affect the glucose level, detect the mean percentage pf time the glucose level is between 70-119 mg/dL
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
---|
Establish the mean percentage of time spent in the glucose ranges of 40-70 mg/dL, 120-179 mg/dL, 180-240 mg/dL and >240 mg/dL in the Basal Period and for the entire day, and the average glucose for the entire 24 hour period.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Mastrototaro J. The MiniMed Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS). J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 1999;12 Suppl 3:751-8. No abstract available.
- Gross TM, Mastrototaro JJ. Efficacy and reliability of the continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000;2 Suppl 1:S19-26. doi: 10.1089/15209150050214087. No abstract available.
- Russell-Jones, D. et al. Diabetologia 2002;45(Suppl. 2):A51
- Boland E, Monsod T, Delucia M, Brandt CA, Fernando S, Tamborlane WV. Limitations of conventional methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001 Nov;24(11):1858-62. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.11.1858.
- Bode BW, Gross TM, Thornton KR, Mastrototaro JJ. Continuous glucose monitoring used to adjust diabetes therapy improves glycosylated hemoglobin: a pilot study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999 Dec;46(3):183-90. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00113-8. Erratum In: Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000 Mar;47(3):225.
- Metzger M, Leibowitz G, Wainstein J, Glaser B, Raz I. Reproducibility of glucose measurements using the glucose sensor. Diabetes Care. 2002 Jul;25(7):1185-91. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.7.1185.
- Gross TM, Bode BW, Einhorn D, Kayne DM, Reed JH, White NH, Mastrototaro JJ. Performance evaluation of the MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system during patient home use. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000 Spring;2(1):49-56. doi: 10.1089/152091500316737.
- King AB, Armstrong D. A comparison of basal insulin delivery: continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus glargine. Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr;26(4):1322. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1322. No abstract available.
- King, AB, Armstrong, DU. Presentation at Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics Meeting, 2003, San Francisco
- Heise, T et al. Diabetes 2003;52(Suppl.1):A121
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2007
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2007
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 4, 2007
First Posted (Estimate)
April 5, 2007
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 18, 2010
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 17, 2010
Last Verified
April 1, 2007
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 06-07
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes
-
Antonio Di MauroCompletedType-2 DiabetesItaly
-
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical SchoolCompletedType 2-diabetesGermany
-
DiaMedica Therapeutics IncCompletedDiabetes Type 2Netherlands
-
RenJi HospitalUnknownType 2 Diabetes.China
-
Chengdu Brilliant Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus
-
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityRecruitingType 2 Diabetes MellitusChina
-
Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityRecruitingType 2 Diabetes MellitusChina
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Imperial College LondonAstraZeneca; Huma; North West London Collaboration of CCGs (NWL CCGs); Imperial...CompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusUnited Kingdom
-
Universiti Sains MalaysiaCompleted
Clinical Trials on glargine
-
Lannett Company, Inc.Parexel; FARMOVS (Pty) LtdCompletedType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 1 Diabetes MellitusSouth Africa
-
RISE Study GroupNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Completed
-
Emory UniversitySanofiCompletedDiabetes MellitusUnited States
-
WockhardtCompletedType1 DiabetesUnited States
-
Xijing HospitalCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusChina
-
University of Colorado, DenverSanofiCompleted
-
Joslin Diabetes CenterSanofiCompleted
-
SanofiTerminated