Protocol Memory Deficit in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

December 29, 2015 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Comparison of the Evolution of Memory Deficit in Patients With Sleep Apnea Obstructive Syndrome (SAOS) Before and After "Effective" Versus Sham Treatment by Positive Pression Continues (PPC)

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the evolution of memory deficit (verbal episodic memory, procedural memory, working memory, short-term memory) in Sleep Apnea Obstructive Syndrome (SAOS) patients after treatment by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure treatment (CPAP). For thus, we will compare memory tests in two separate groups of SAOS patients with "effective " versus "ineffective" ( or sham) CPAP, before and 6 weeks after the beginning of the treatment. Thus we will assess the evolution of memory deficit, the effectiveness of the treatment on the evolution of memory deficit before and 6 weeks after the beginning of the treatment by "effective " versus "ineffective" CPAP.

We feel the results of the tests of memory will show greater memory disorders in patients with SAOS before beginning the treatment rather than six weeks afterwards. Thus we hypothesise that, after the treatment by "effective" CPAP, the patients with SAOS will have greater improvement of their memory disorders than those treated by "sham CPAP".

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

We want to assess the evolution, before and 6 weeks after the beginning of the treatment, of the significant differences of the performances of the various memory tests evaluating several forms of memory (episodic memory, working memory, short-term memory and procedural memory) according to the treatment for patients with SAOS (effective versus sham).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Isere
      • Grenoble, Isere, France
        • Laboratoire EFCR-Functional Cardio-Respiratory Exploration Laboratory

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major patients,
  • agreeing,
  • diagnosed suffering from the SAOS,
  • regulation by the specialist in a treatment by CPAP,
  • patients do not begin the treatment
  • affiliated to the social security,
  • fluent in French.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting severe depressive disorders (HADS score>19),
  • intellectual deterioration (MMS< 28),
  • a functional failure of the dominant arm upper limb inhibiting realization of graphic tasks,
  • an associated oxygen treatment,
  • suffering from cancer,
  • cerebro-vascular accident,
  • pregnant or nursing women,
  • adult under supervision or trusteeship,
  • patients already included in another research protocol or in period of exclusion,
  • antidepressant and anxiolytic treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Effective CPAP treatment
Effective Continuous Positive Airway Pressure treatment (CPAP) applied for 6 weeks
Auto-titrating CPAP machines (Remstar Auto; Philips Respironics, Murrysville, PA) provided by a home care company (Bastide Medical, France). Pressure was set between 6 and 14 cm of water
Sham Comparator: Sham CPAP treatment
Ineffective Continuous Positive Airway Pressure treatment (sham CPAP) applied for 6 weeks
Similar CPAP machine delivering a 4 cm of water pressure that was too low to suppress sleep respiratory events.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All individual patient data are anonymized

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Memory Deficit

Clinical Trials on Effective CPAP

3
Subscribe