Late Phase 2 Study of OPC-12759 Ophthalmic Suspension

June 4, 2013 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dose-response of OPC-12759 suspension in dry eye patients

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

308

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chubu region, Japan
      • Kansai region, Japan
      • Kanto region, Japan
      • Kyushu region, Japan
      • Shikoku region, Japan
      • Tohoku region, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Outpatient
  2. Subjective complaint of dry eye that has been present for minimum 20 months
  3. Ocular discomfort severity is moderate to severe
  4. Corneal - conjunctival damage is moderate to severe
  5. Unanesthetized Schirmer's test score of 5mm/5minutes or less
  6. Best corrected visual acuity of 0.2 or better in both eyes

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of anterior segment disease or disorder other than that associated with keratoconjunctivitis sicca
  2. Ocular hypertension patient or glaucoma patient with ophthalmic solution
  3. Anticipated use of any topically-instilled ocular medications or patients who cannot discontinue the use during the study
  4. Anticipated use of contact lens during the study
  5. Patient with punctal plug
  6. Any history of ocular surgery within 12 months
  7. Female patients who are pregnant, possibly pregnant or breast feeding
  8. Known hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug or procedural medications
  9. Receipt of any investigational product within 4 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
0% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension received one drop to both eyes four times a day for 4 weeks.
comparison of different dosages of drug
Experimental: 1% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension
1% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension received one drop to both eyes four times a day for 4 weeks.
comparison of different dosages of drug
Experimental: 2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension
2% OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension received one drop to both eyes four times a day for 4 weeks.
comparison of different dosages of drug

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fluorescein Corneal Staining (FCS) Score From Baseline to Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4weeks
FCS indicates the damage to the corneal epithelium. Per the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop report, the cornea was divided into 5 fractions, each of which was given a staining score from 0 to 3, and the total score was calculated(0-15). 0 is better.The change from baseline (CFB) to LOCF at the end of instillation (LOCF endpoint) was used to analyze dose-response. A general linear model was used to examine if slope parameters were not equal to zero.
Baseline, 4weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Lissamine Green Conjunctival Staining (LGCS) Score From Baseline to Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4weeks
LGCS indicates the damage to the conjunctival epithelium. Per the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop report, the conjunctival sac and the conjunctina was divided into 6 ractions, each of which was given a staining score from 0 to 3, and the total score was calculated(0-18). 0 is better. The CFB to each study time point was compared between the active-drug groups and the placebo group, and LOCF endpoint scores were used to compare the active-drug groups and the placebo group. In each treatment group, baseline scores and those obtained at each study time point were compared.
Baseline, 4weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Satoshi Oshima, Division of dermatologicals and ophthalmologicals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 13, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Syndromes

Clinical Trials on placebo

Subscribe