Mechanisms in Heart Failure With Normal EF (HFpEF)

February 6, 2012 updated by: Barry Borlaug, Mayo Clinic

Invasive Characterization of the Mechanisms Underlying Exertional Intolerance and Increased Filling Pressures in Patients With Heart Failure and a Preserved EF

The guiding hypotheses are that (1) mechanisms in addition to diastolic dysfunction, while normal at rest, are compromised with stress, leading to symptoms of HF, and (2) that an increased proportion of the increase in LV diastolic pressures seen in HFpEF is mediated via exaggerated pericardial/right heart-LV coupling (restraint).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Nearly half of all patients with heart failure have a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)1-3. This group is increasing in prevalence, has similar morbidity and mortality to systolic HF, and, despite increasing awareness of the healthcare burden, is without proven treatments1. This is related largely to a limited understanding of the basic mechanisms causing the disease3. Recent studies have added to contemporary understanding, but the pathophysiology remains controversial and incompletely understood4-8. A limitation of most prior studies is that the noninvasive measurements employed are merely surrogates for gold standard, invasive hemodynamic assessment9. There is general consensus that HFpEF patients have increased left ventricular filling pressures (LVDP) and relatively normal systolic function at rest5,8,10, but two critical questions remain: what causes the increase in LVDP, and, are there important deficits in the cardiovascular response to exercise stress in HFpEF patients3,4? The current study will resolve these questions by performing comprehensive hemodynamic analysis in HFpEF patients referred to the cardiac cath lab, compared to age and gender matched controls without HF. LV systolic, diastolic, and vascular function will be examined at rest and during graded supine exercise at fixed and varied preload to definitively characterize both baseline differences and discrepancies in cardiovascular reserve function that only become apparent during stress, when HFpEF patients typically become symptomatic11. This study will yield valuable information describing the roles for systolic, diastolic and pericardial abnormalities in the pathogenesis of HFpEF, providing critical preliminary data upon which better targeted therapeutic trials of this common disorder can be based.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

HFpEF subjects (NYHA class ≥II) defined by modified Framingham criteria4 (2 major or 1 major + 2 minor): Major criteria: paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea or orthopnea, jugular distension or venous pressure>16 mmHg, rales or pulmonary edema, cardiomegaly, hepatojugular reflex, weight loss>4.5 kg in response to diuretics, BNP>400; Minor criteria: ankle edema, nocturnal cough, exertional dyspnea, pleural effusion, HR>120, hepatomegaly, vital capacity<2/3 normal, BNP>200, LA volume index>40cc/m2.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age>18, EF≥50% at echocardiography within 6 months, referred for cath. HFpEF subjects

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with: any medical conditions that would limit study participation, pregnancy, myocardial infarction within 30 days of enrollment, hemodynamically significant valvular disease, HF due to thyroid disease, myocarditis, restrictive or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cor pulmonale (PVR>5 Wood units with RV dysfunction), LV thrombus, atrial fibrillation or other persistent irregular rhythm, dyspnea felt predominantly due to pulmonary disease, significant coronary artery stenoses (>70%, or 50-70% with FFR<0.8) or other abnormalities detected during the clinical catheterization procedure which require revascularization or other directed therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
HFpEF
Patients with a history of HFpEF
All pressure-volume data is acquired at 250 Hz and stored on the Leycom system for offline analysis. Volume data will be calibrated using the most recent EF from echocardiogram and stroke volume from the Fick method. Measured O2 consumption will be utilized along with sampling of SVC and arterial blood oximetry to determine cardiac output at rest and during exercise
control
Patients with a without a history of CHF
All pressure-volume data is acquired at 250 Hz and stored on the Leycom system for offline analysis. Volume data will be calibrated using the most recent EF from echocardiogram and stroke volume from the Fick method. Measured O2 consumption will be utilized along with sampling of SVC and arterial blood oximetry to determine cardiac output at rest and during exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Specific Aim 1. Elucidate the relative roles of impaired ventricular systolic, diastolic, and vascular reserve functions during supine exercise in HFpEF
Time Frame: during catheterization
during catheterization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Specific Aim 2. Determine whether resting and exercise-induced increases in LV diastolic pressures are related to exaggerated right-left heart coupling and to increased afterload.
Time Frame: during cardiac catheterization
during cardiac catheterization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Barry A. Borlaug, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

January 7, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2012

Last Verified

May 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 07-005202
  • HFpEF

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on RHC with VO2 consumption

Subscribe