Early Versus Expectant Treatment of Ureaplasma Infection in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates

April 17, 2017 updated by: Robert Schelonka, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Our hypothesis is that treatment of known Ureaplasma spp. infection of the airways in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with azithromycin will eradicate the organisms and lessen the proinflammatory state caused by infection that puts them at risk for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD). We propose to conduct a randomized trial of early (less than 3 days of age) treatment with intravenous azithromycin versus expectant management for VLBW infants with Ureaplasma spp. respiratory tract infection with the following specific aims: (1) Determine microbiological efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of azithromycin treatment for eradication of Ureaplasma spp. in preterm infants, (2) Determine the respiratory outcomes of infants in the two treatment groups and those without respiratory tract Ureaplasma spp. infection

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 3 days (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants weighing <1250 grams at birth with respiratory distress syndrome who have respiratory infection with Ureaplasma sp organisms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe respiratory distress syndrome with survival unlikely >7 days, Congenital malformations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Early treatment with azithromycin
10 mg/kg IV per dose given for 10 days
No Intervention: 2
Expectant (usual) management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbiological Efficacy of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants
Time Frame: 100 days or discharge from hospital
Number of subjects without ureaplasma spp at 100 days after study entry or at hospital discharge in subjects receiving therapy
100 days or discharge from hospital
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants
Time Frame: 100 days or discharge from hospital
Pharmacokinetic measures (AUC12) of subjects receiving azithromycin who had eradication of ureaplasma spp.at either day 100 or discharge day which ever comes first.
100 days or discharge from hospital
Safety of Azithromycin Treatment for Eradication of Ureaplasma Spp. in Preterm Infants
Time Frame: from day 1 of study drug through 100 days or discharge from hospital, which ever comes first
Number of serious of adverse event experienced by subjects treated with azithromycin
from day 1 of study drug through 100 days or discharge from hospital, which ever comes first

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory Outcomes as Determined by Subjects Without Respiratory Tract Ureaplasma Spp Infection in Subjects in the Two Treatment Groups
Time Frame: from baseline to 100 days or discharge from Hospital, which ever comes first
Absence of Ureaplasma spp infection is determined by the total number of days with positive pressure ventilation, (conventional ventilation or nasal continuous positive pressure) and oxygen therapy. The mean number of days was used to compare the two treatment groups.
from baseline to 100 days or discharge from Hospital, which ever comes first

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert L Schelonka, MD, University of Alabama at Birminham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

January 23, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Tract Infections

Clinical Trials on Azithromycin

3
Subscribe