Telemedicine vs. Face-to-Face Cancer Genetic Counseling

February 21, 2012 updated by: Duke University

Telemedicine vs. Face-to-Face Cancer Genetic Counseling in Rural Oncology Clinics

Cancer genetic counseling (CGC) has been found to have "substantial" benefits for individuals with breast cancer and their family members; it has been deemed by multiple organizations as "standard of care" for women with breast cancer and their relatives. Unfortunately, there is a disparity in access to CGC, especially among women who live in rural and underserved areas. In North Carolina, only two cancer genetic counselors practice in rural clinics - each only for a few days per month. Therefore, in an effort to make CGC more widely available in a timely manner, we propose to test provision of counseling through telemedicine (TM), in which a patient and health care provider communicate with each other using videoconferencing. In 4 rural oncology clinics, we will implement low-cost TM and compare satisfaction and cost-effectiveness between groups of women designated to have their CGC session by TM or FTF. We'll use a validated measure to assess satisfaction by a phone survey one week after the CGC appointment; cost-effectiveness will be measured at project's end by calculating length of wait time for appointment and costs of equipment, labor, and mileage. Study hypothesis: TM is as satisfactory as FTF counseling and is a more cost-effective way to provide this beneficial service.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Henderson, North Carolina, United States, 27536
        • Maria Parham Medical Center
      • Laurinburg, North Carolina, United States, 28352
        • Scotland Cancer Treatment Center
      • Lumberton, North Carolina, United States, 28358
        • Gibson Cancer Center
      • Smithfield, North Carolina, United States, 27577
        • Johnston Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals referred for cancer genetic counseling (e.g., by medical oncologist, primary care physician or self) in one of 4 oncology clinics: Gibson Cancer Center in Lumberton, NC; Scotland Cancer Treatment Center in Laurinburg, NC; Johnston Cancer Center in Smithfield, NC; and Maria Parham Cancer Center in Henderson, NC.
  • Willing to be randomized to receive counseling via telemedicine or face-to-face.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Referred for cancer genetic counseling from any clinic other than the 4 listed above.
  • Unwilling to be randomized to receive counseling via telemedicine or face-to-face.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: TM
Telemedicine genetic counseling group
Telemedicine genetic counseling
Other: FTF
Face-to-face genetic counseling group
Face-to-face genetic counseling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: One week post-intervention (genetic counseling session)
One week post-intervention (genetic counseling session)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: Enrollment completion
Enrollment completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martha B Adams, M.D., M.A., Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lynch Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Telemedicine

3
Subscribe