Daclizumab Versus Thymoglobulin in Renal Transplant Recipients With High Immunological Risk (TAXI)

May 21, 2008 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

Multicenter Randomized Study to Compare Induction Therapy With Polyclonal Antithymocytes Globulins (ATG) Versus Monoclonal Anti-IL2R Antibody (Daclizumab) in a Triple Drug Regimen in Renal Transplant Recipients With High Immunological Risk.

To compare renal allograft rejection rates during the first year among high-immunological risk recipients between patients who received either ATG or the anti-IL2R mAb daclizumab.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The objective of this randomized, multi-center trial is to directly compare the ATG, Thymoglobulin, with the anti-CD25 mAb, daclizumab, in a high-risk, HLA-sensitized renal transplant population, in order to elucidate whether there is any significant difference in the incidence of acute rejection after one year.

Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either ATG (1.25 mg/kg/d from day 0 to day 7) or daclizumab (1 mg/kg at days 0, 14, 28, 42 and 56). Maintenance immunosuppression comprised tacrolimus, MMF and prednisone. The study's primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at one year.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

227

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France, 59037
        • University Hospital of Lille

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Third or fourth renal graft or
  2. Current anti-HLA antibodies above or equal to 30% at the last evaluation or
  3. Peak anti-HLA antibodies above or equal to 50% at the last evaluation or
  4. A second graft if the first was lost within 2 years because of rejection.
  5. Patients who gave their informed consent and are able to understand the scope of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Transplantation from living donors or recipients of multiple grafts or patients who already have received another (non-renal) allograft.
  2. Transplantation from a non-heart beating donor
  3. Transplantation of two kidneys from the same donor
  4. Patients with generalized infection at the time of transplantation
  5. Women in child-bearing age who do not plan to use efficient contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1, ATG
Thymoglobulin induction during 8 days (1.25 mg/kg per day) associated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids
Thymoglobulin: 1.25 mg/kg per day from day 0 to day 7 post transplantation
Other Names:
  • Thymoglobulin, Genzyme
Active Comparator: 2, Daclizumab
Dacluzamb induction (five infusions, 1 mg/kg per infusion) associated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids
Daclizumab: 1mg/kg at day 0, 14, 28, 42 and 56 post transplantation
Other Names:
  • Zenapax, Roche

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of biopsy-proven acute allograft rejection during the first post-transplant year
Time Frame: acute rejection proved by graft biopsy
acute rejection proved by graft biopsy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who experienced an acute rejection episode, whether confirmed by biopsy or not at 1 year.
Time Frame: graft dysfunction
graft dysfunction
Proportion of patients who experienced more than one episode of acute allograft rejection
Time Frame: graft dysfunction, biopsies
graft dysfunction, biopsies
Proportion of patients who experienced an acute rejection episode that required therapy by anti-lymphocyte antibodies (ATG or OKT3)
Time Frame: number of anti-lymphocyte treatment required for acute rejection episodes
number of anti-lymphocyte treatment required for acute rejection episodes
Number of acute rejection episodes per therapeutic arms and mean number of acute rejection episode per patient in each arm
Time Frame: graft dysfunction and biopsies
graft dysfunction and biopsies
Banff grade of the first rejection episode
Time Frame: graft biopsy
graft biopsy
Incidence of adverse events in the two treatment arms at 1 year
Time Frame: number of adverse events reported by the investigators
number of adverse events reported by the investigators
Incidence of delayed graft function
Time Frame: number of patient who required hemodialysis during the first week post transplantation
number of patient who required hemodialysis during the first week post transplantation
Graft function at 1 year
Time Frame: serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate
serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate
Graft and patient survival at 1 year
Time Frame: number of graft failures and/or deaths
number of graft failures and/or deaths

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian Noël, MD, PhD, University Hospital of Lille, France
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Abramowicz, MD, PhD, Erasme Hospital, Bruxelles, Belgium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

May 22, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 22, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2008

Last Verified

February 1, 2004

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Transplantation

Clinical Trials on Thymoglobulin (ATG)

Subscribe