Impact of the Use of Remote Monitoring in the Follow-up of the Renal Transplant Patient. (APT'x)

Transplant Centers are facing new organisational challenges with regards to the growing number of patients they have to follow-up. We have developed and assessed the feasibility of using a novel web application permitting a medically-tailored follow-up of stable renal transplanted outpatients: Ap'TELECARE. This novel approach is likely to facilitate the organization of patients' follow-up at the Transplant Centre level as well as to provide secondary individual benefits in terms of therapeutic education, adherence to treatment and eventually to improve long term outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

738

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Site Gabriel-Montpied
      • Saint-Étienne, France
        • CHU Saint-Etienne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients transplanted for at least 3 months
  • Stable renal graft function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No home internet access
  • Major disability

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: traditional patient follow-up
a group of renal transplant outpatients consulting their Transplant Centre following a traditional schedule (every other week up to 6 months post-transplant, once a month up to year 1, every three months up to year 2 and every 6 months thereafter)
a group of renal transplant outpatients consulting their Transplant Centre following a traditional schedule
Experimental: medically-tailored follow-up with Ap'Telecare
a group of patients assisted by Ap'Telecare and consulting their Transplant Centre following a less stringent schedule of consultations (every month up to 6 months, every other month up to year 1, every six months up to year 2 and once a year thereafter).
an internet application on a computer, tablet or smartphone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients experiencing at least one episode of graft dysfunction
Time Frame: 2 years
graft dysfunction defined by a drop of at least 20% of their usual estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) value)
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Failure of immunosuppressive treatment
Time Frame: 2 years
Detection of donor-specific anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) antibodies by LUMINEX technic
2 years
number of patients who needed to return to dialysis
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
number of patients with acute or chronic transplant rejection
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Post-transplant complication
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Quality of life assessed
Time Frame: 2 years
EuroQol group - 5 Dimensions ( EQ-5D) scale
2 years
Level of anxiety and depression
Time Frame: 2 years
Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale
2 years
Incremental cost-effectiveness evaluation criteria
Time Frame: 2 years
Cost per QALY earned (QALYs estimated from the EuroQol group - 5 Dimensions ( EQ-5D) quality of life scale).
2 years
Evaluation criteria for the Budget Impact Analysis
Time Frame: 2 years
Average cost saved per 100 patients treated in the "Ap'Telecare group" compared to the "traditional follow-up".
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christophe Mariat, MD PhD, CHU Saint-Etienne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1708232
  • 2018-A00677-48 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Transplantation

Clinical Trials on traditional schedule

Subscribe