Capsule Endoscopy vs Standard of Care for Obscure Intestinal Bleeding

December 1, 2017 updated by: Dr. Robert Hilsden, University of Calgary

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Capsule Endoscopy vs Standard Care in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia With Suspected Obscure / Occult Gastrointestinal Bleeding

The role of capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients with obscure / occult gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding remains unclear. This pragmatic randomized controlled trial is designed to determine the diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes of patients with obscure GI bleeding who receive CE compared to those who receive usual standard care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with iron deficiency anemia from suspected occult GI bleeding will be randomized to receive CE or usual standard care following a negative gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Our primary outcome measure (diagnostic yield) and secondary outcome measures (noted below) will be determined after one year of followup. Patients with have a minimum of one year of clinical followup. Direct health care costs in each arm of the study will be determined after a minimum of two years of followup.

An economic evaluation based on the results of the clinical trial is also planned.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1
        • University of Calgary

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients age over 18years with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). IDA is defined as hemoglobin <137g/L in men or <120g/L in women with serum ferritin level <22ug/L in men and <10ug/L in women.
  2. Eligible patients should have a negative gastroscopy and negative colonoscopy within 1 year prior to entry into study.
  3. Negative celiac screen and /or negative small bowel biopsies

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Overt gastrointestinal bleeding
  2. Premenopausal women with menorrhagia
  3. Known or suspected small bowel obstruction
  4. Serious medical co-morbidities precluding surgery given the risk of capsule impaction
  5. Pregnancy
  6. Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 2
Standard Care
Any other diagnostic tests (if not already performed) that the referring or attending physician deems necessary aside from Wireless Capsule Endoscopy.
Experimental: 1
Wireless capsule endoscopy

Procedure performed once only after randomization. If procedure is incomplete due to a number of variables, procedure may possibly need to be repeated.

Diagnostic possibilities: normal exam, active bleeding, potential source of bleeding (angiodysplasia, ulcer, tumor)

Other Names:
  • Capsule endoscopy
  • Given Imaging Pillcam
  • Pill camera

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
diagnostic yield
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of blood transfusions
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
number of hospitalizations for GI bleeding/anemia
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks
number of GI-related procedures and investigations
Time Frame: 48
48
procedure-related complications
Time Frame: 48
48
quality of life
Time Frame: 48
measured by 1) SF36 - 8 domains + PCS/MCS, 2) GI Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), 3) EQ-5D - index + visual analogue scale
48
health care costs
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Catherine J. Dube, MD PhD, University of Calgary

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Iron Deficiency Anemia

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic Test - Given Imaging Pillcam

3
Subscribe