Pelvic Exenteration and Laterally Extended Pelvic Resection (Pre-PEX)

Accuracy of Ultrasound Scan in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration and Laterally Extended Pelvic Resection

Growing evidence in literature is supporting the role of ultrasound scan (US) as accurate tool in diagnosis and staging of gynecologic cancers. In particular, different studies demonstrated the accuracy of US in assessing endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancer in the primary setting. However, the number of studies investigating the role of US in the recurrent setting is limited. Moreover, there is no evidence in literature exploring the role of US in laterally-extended pelvic recurrences from gynecologic cancer, where the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan is still considered the most accurate tool.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All consecutive patients who are planned to undergo pelvic exenteration or laterally extended pelvic resection at Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, will undergo ultrasound scan at the time of the pre-operative anesthetic assessment or the day before the planned surgery. A pre-defined case report form (CRF) will be filled by the ultrasound examiner. The ultrasound characteristics will be compared with the final histology (considered the referral standard).

The ultrasound examinations will be carried out using high-end ultrasound equipment. The frequency of the vaginal probes varied between 5.0 and 9.0 MHz. All examinations will be performed by a specialist obstetrics and gynecology with expertise in gynecologic oncology ultrasound scan. A subjective semi-quantitative assessment of the amount of blood flow within the examined lesion will be made (color score): a score of 1 was recorded when no blood flow could be found; 2 when only minimal/moderate flow could be detected; 3 when very strong blood-flow signals were present.

All patients will undergo pre-operative MRI scan and PET/CT scan. Pelvic exenteration and laterally-extended pelvic resection will be performed with the aim to remove en bloc the recurrent or persistent disease with a free-of-tumor margin.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

85

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing pelvic evisceration and lateral pelvic resection

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All consecutive patients with histologically-proven recurrent or persistent gynecological cancer who are planned to undergo pelvic exenteration or laterally extended pelvic resection, both with curative and with palliative intent.

  • Anterior/total pelvic exenteration
  • Laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER)
  • Laterally extended pelvic resection (LEPR) is defined as an en bloc lateral resection of a pelvic tumor involving sidewall muscle, and/or bone, and/or major nerve, and/or major vascular structure
  • With or without stoma formation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Radical hysterectomy without lateral resection
  • Rectal resection only (posterior exenteration)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pelvic exenteration resection.
Time Frame: 30 minutes
The accuracy of US in the assessment of pelvic structures involvement in recurrent/persistent gynecologic tumors with disease limited to the pelvis.
30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
accuracy of US with the accuracy of MRI
Time Frame: 1 week
To compare accuracy of US with the accuracy of MRI scan using histology as standard.
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ANTONIA CARLA TESTA, PROF, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 19, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3612

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Cancer

Clinical Trials on PELVIC EXENTERATION

3
Subscribe