Educational and Skills Training Program for Parents of Childhood Cancer Survivors Who Have Neurobehavioral Dysfunction

October 11, 2010 updated by: City of Hope Medical Center

A Behavioral Intervention Trial for Parents of Childhood Cancer Survivors With Neurobehavioral Late Effects

RATIONALE: An educational and skills training program for the parent of a childhood cancer survivor with neurobehavioral dysfunction may help improve the child's school performance, thinking ability, and behavior.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying an educational and skills training program for parents of childhood cancer survivors who have neurobehavioral dysfunction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • To determine the feasibility of implementing an educational and skills training intervention for parents of a childhood cancer survivor with neurobehavioral dysfunction using face-to-face training sessions and phone assistance.
  • To pilot test and collect preliminarily data on the indirect therapeutic impact of the parent training intervention on the child's academic, cognitive, and behavioral functioning.
  • To pilot test and collect preliminary outcomes of the parent training intervention on parents of a childhood cancer survivor with neurobehavioral dysfunction.

OUTLINE: Parent and child participants are randomized to 1 of 2 intervention arms.

  • Arm I (parent intervention program and usual care): In addition to medical care, child participants and their families may access multidisciplinary psychosocial services (i.e., usual care). Parents also receive 8 weekly face-to-face training sessions (75-90 minutes each) with a therapist over approximately 2-3 months. The training sessions include integration and didactic review of a parent's role as a behavioral and emotional support system for the child's school success; a parent's role as a monitor and motivator for school performance; a parent's role as an intervener and teacher of effective learning and study strategies; and a parent's role as a child advocate and accessor of educational and community resources. Parents are instructed to engage in ≥ 30 minutes of cognitive and academic activities with their child ≥ 4 days a week. The therapist will observe the parent (in the home or clinic) apply knowledge and techniques learned in the parent training sessions directly with the child at least once after the 4th parent-therapist session to provide feedback to the parent and child and to assess which parents may require more intense training and support. The sessions may be videotaped by the parent and provided to the therapist for review and follow up.

Phone support/assistance is provided by the therapist within 2-3 days following each training session to provide additional problem-solving assistance and teaching support to the parents while they are implementing the knowledge and strategies learned during the training sessions and to measure study adherence and behavioral implementation between the sessions. After completion of the training sessions, continued phone support/assistance is provided by the therapist every 2 weeks for up to 6 months to provide ongoing support and problem-solving and teaching assistance as needed and to promote ongoing maintenance of the trained parenting practices with a greater degree of independence. "Booster" in-person sessions may also occur if determined to be needed by both the therapist and parent.

  • Arm II (wait-list/usual care control [UCC]): Child participants and their families undergo usual care as in arm I and are placed on a wait-list.

Parent and child participants in both arms complete battery testing and questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Battery testing includes the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT-II) and the WISC-IV Working Memory Index and Children's Memory Scale (CMS) subtests. Questionnaires include parent, teacher, and child [self-report] questionnaires (BASC-II, BRIEF, and SMALSI); Parent Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised; Parent Knowledge and Efficacy Questionnaire; and Parent's Treatment Barriers and Satisfaction Questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010-3000
        • City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Childhood cancer survivor who received CNS-directed therapy (i.e., intrathecal chemotherapy and/or cranial radiotherapy) for leukemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma

    • In remission AND completed treatment ≥ 3 months ago
    • No brain tumors
  • Enrolled in school and demonstrates a deficit (operationalized as at least one standard deviation below the age expected mean) on at least one objective test of attention or memory on baseline cognitive assessment screening AND has evidence of problems in learning and adaptive functioning

    • Parent, teacher, or self-report of problems as measured by a T-score of ≥ 60 on the BRIEF or BASC or below average academic achievement scores
    • Able to be tested in English using standardized cognitive and academic achievement tools

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Primary participating parent or caregiver fluent in English and lives with the child
  • No known history of a major psychiatric condition (i.e., psychosis) that precludes study participation (child or participating parent or caregiver)
  • No history of child developmental disability prior to cancer diagnosis

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (parent intervention program and usual care)
Child participants and their families may access multidisciplinary psychosocial services (i.e., usual care). Parents also receive 8 weekly face-to-face training sessions (75-90 minutes each) with a therapist over approximately 2-3 months. Phone support/assistance is provided by the therapist within 2-3 days following each training session and then every 2 weeks for up to 6 months after completion of the training sessions.
Parents receive face-to-face training sessions with a therapist over approximately 2-3 months. Phone support/assistance is provided by the therapist within 2-3 days following each training session and then every 2 weeks for up to 6 months after completion of the training sessions.
Child participants and their families may access multidisciplinary psychosocial services (i.e., usual care).
Active Comparator: Arm II (wait-list/usual care control [UCC])
Child participants and their families undergo usual care as in arm I and are placed on a wait-list.
Child participants and their families may access multidisciplinary psychosocial services (i.e., usual care).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
WIAT-II-Reading, Mathematics, and Writing composite scores as measured at baseline and 6 months (child participant)
Knowledge, efficacy, and self-report of pro-learning behaviors as measured by the PKEQ and PBQ-R at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months (parent participant)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Parent, teacher, and self-report measures as measured by the BRIEF, BASC-II, and SMALSI at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months (child participant)
Performance on attention and memory tests as measured by the CMS and WISC-IV subtests at baseline and 6 months (child participant)
Parenting stress as measured by the PSI at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months (parent participant)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sunita Patel, PhD, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

July 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2010

Last Verified

October 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on educational intervention

3
Subscribe