Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of INCB018424 in Patients With Polycythemia Vera or Essential Thrombocythemia

October 15, 2025 updated by: Incyte Corporation

A Phase 2, Open Label, Dose Regimen Ranging Clinical Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of INCB018424 in Patients With Advanced Polycythemia Vera or Essential Thrombocythemia Refractory to Hydroxyurea

To evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of different treatment regimens of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) administered to two groups of patients; those with polycythemia vera (PV) and those with essential thrombocythemia (ET). Patients in each group were refractory to hydroxyurea or for whom hydroxyurea is contraindicated.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study consisted of a 2-stage design, which included a dose-ranging phase (during which patients received treatment at their randomized dose) and an expansion phase (after adjustment of dose/regimen to achieve an optimal balance of efficacy and safety). During the dose-ranging phase, patients in each disease group (PV or ET) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio independent of each other to receive 1 of 3 treatment regimens with Ruxolitinib, 10 mg twice daily (bid), 25 mg bid, or 50 mg once daily (qd). After patients completed 2 cycles of treatment with Ruxolitinib at the randomized dose, Investigators were permitted to adjust the dose/regimen on an individual basis using their discretion in order to achieve an optimal balance of efficacy and safety. During the expansion phase (ie, after optimization of dose), additional patients with PV or ET were enrolled to receive Ruxolitinib at the dose that was selected upon review of data from the dose-ranging phase. Treatment continued until a patient met a withdrawal criterion, had intolerable toxicity, progression of disease, or withdrew consent.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

73

Phase

  • Phase 2

Expanded Access

Approved for sale to the public. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bergamo, Italy
      • Florence, Italy
      • Pavia, Italy
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia as determined by treating physician
  • Disease refractory to hydroxyurea or for whom treatment with hydroxyurea is contraindicated or have refused further treatment with hydroxyurea due to side effects.
  • Patient meets baseline clinical lab parameters

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with interferon alpha or anagrelide within 7 days and hydroxyurea within 1 day of starting INCB018424.
  • Patients diagnosed with another malignancy unless the malignancy was cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or basal or squamous cell skin cancer and the patient has been disease free for > 3 years
  • Patients receiving therapy with intermediate or high dose steroids greater than the equivalent of 10 mg prednisone per day
  • Clinically significant cardiac disease (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ruxolitinib 10 mg BID
Participants received 10 mg Ruxolitinib orally twice a day (BID) for 56 days (two 28-day cycles) during the dose-ranging phase. After patients completed 2 cycles of treatment at the randomized dose, Investigators were permitted to adjust the dose/regimen on an individual basis to achieve an optimal balance of efficacy and safety. Treatment continued until a patient met a withdrawal criterion, had intolerable toxicity, progression of disease, or withdrew consent.
Ruxolitinib was administered orally and supplied as 5 mg and 25 mg tablets.
Other Names:
  • INCB018424
Experimental: Ruxolitinib 25 mg BID
Participants received 25 mg Ruxolitinib orally twice a day (BID) for 56 days (two 28-day cycles) during the dose-ranging phase. After patients completed 2 cycles of treatment at the randomized dose, Investigators were permitted to adjust the dose/regimen on an individual basis to achieve an optimal balance of efficacy and safety. Treatment continued until a patient met a withdrawal criterion, had intolerable toxicity, progression of disease, or withdrew consent.
Ruxolitinib was administered orally and supplied as 5 mg and 25 mg tablets.
Other Names:
  • INCB018424
Experimental: Ruxolitinib 50 mg QD
Participants received 50 mg Ruxolitinib orally once a day (QD) for 56 days (two 28-day cycles) during the dose-ranging phase. After patients completed 2 cycles of treatment at the randomized dose, Investigators were permitted to adjust the dose/regimen on an individual basis to achieve an optimal balance of efficacy and safety. Treatment continued until a patient met a withdrawal criterion, had intolerable toxicity, progression of disease, or withdrew consent.
Ruxolitinib was administered orally and supplied as 5 mg and 25 mg tablets.
Other Names:
  • INCB018424

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Polycythemia Vera Participants With a Confirmed Clinical Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR)
Time Frame: Assessed after 2 cycles (56 days) of treatment on Day 1 of Cycle 3

For a confirmed response all criteria must have been sustained for at least 2 months.

CR:

  • Hematocrit < 45% in men and < 42% in women
  • No phlebotomy for 1 month
  • No palpable splenomegaly
  • White blood cells < 10 x 10^9/L with normal differential and platelets < 400 x 10^9/L
  • No sustained leucopenia or thrombocytopenia (>2 weeks)
  • No systemic PV symptoms (pruritus, night sweats, bone pain, fever, weight loss)

PR:

  • Hematocrit < 45% in men and < 42% in women
  • 50% reduction in phlebotomy requirements from 6 months before treatment started
  • 50% reduction in palpable splenomegaly
Assessed after 2 cycles (56 days) of treatment on Day 1 of Cycle 3
Percentage of Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) Participants With a Confirmed Clinical Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR)
Time Frame: Assessed after 2 cycles (56 days) of treatment on Day 1 of Cycle 3.

For a confirmed response all criteria must have been sustained for at least 2 months.

Complete Clinical Response:

  • Platelet count < 400 x 10^9/L
  • White blood cell count < 10 x 10^9/L with normal differential and Hematocrit ≤ upper limit of normal
  • Absence of sustained (> 2 weeks) anemia or leucopenia based on institutional normal ranges
  • Absence of systemic ET symptoms (pruritus, bone pain, weakness, night sweats, paresthesias)
  • Absence of palpable splenomegaly

Partial Clinical Response:

  • Platelet count < 400 x 10^9/L
  • 50% reduction in palpable splenomegaly
Assessed after 2 cycles (56 days) of treatment on Day 1 of Cycle 3.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Polycythemia Vera Participants Who Achieved Individual Components of Clinical Response at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 (Cycle 4, Day 1)

The individual components of clinical response included:

  • Hematocrit (Hct) < 45% without phlebotomy
  • Absence of palpable splenomegaly
  • 50% reduction in spleen size
  • Platelet count ≤ 400 x 10^9/L
  • White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10^9/L
Baseline and Week 12 (Cycle 4, Day 1)
Percentage of Polycythemia Vera Participants Who Achieved Individual Components of Clinical Response at 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 (Cycle 7, Day 1)

The individual components of clinical response included:

  • Hematocrit (Hct) < 45% without phlebotomy
  • Absence of palpable splenomegaly
  • 50% reduction in spleen size
  • Platelet count ≤ 400 x 10^9/L
  • White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10^9/L
Baseline and Week 24 (Cycle 7, Day 1)
Percentage of Polycythemia Vera Participants Who Achieved Individual Components of Clinical Response at 36 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 36 (Cycle 10, Day 1)

The individual components of clinical response included:

  • Hematocrit (Hct) < 45% without phlebotomy
  • Absence of palpable splenomegaly
  • 50% reduction in spleen size
  • Platelet count ≤ 400 x 10^9/L
  • White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10^9/L
Baseline and Week 36 (Cycle 10, Day 1)
Percentage of Essential Thrombocythemia Participants Who Achieved Individual Components of Clinical Response at 4 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (Cycle 2, Day 1)

The individual components of clinical response included:

  • Platelet count ≤ 400 x 10^9/L
  • White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10^9/L
  • 50% reduction in spleen size
  • Absence of palpable splenomegaly
Baseline and 4 weeks (Cycle 2, Day 1)
Percentage of Essential Thrombocythemia Participants Who Achieved Individual Components of Clinical Response at 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks (Cycle 7, Day 1)

The individual components of clinical response included:

  • Platelet count ≤ 400 x 10^9/L
  • White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10^9/L
  • 50% reduction in spleen size
  • Absence of palpable splenomegaly
Baseline and 24 weeks (Cycle 7, Day 1)
Percentage of Essential Thrombocythemia Participants Who Achieved Individual Components of Clinical Response at 36 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 36 weeks (Cycle 10, Day 1)

The individual components of clinical response included:

  • Platelet count ≤ 400 x 10^9/L
  • White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10^9/L
  • 50% reduction in spleen size
  • Absence of palpable splenomegaly
Baseline and 36 weeks (Cycle 10, Day 1)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Polycythemia Vera Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4 (Cycle 2, Day 1)

Patients were asked to rate their symptoms on a scale of 0 (none) to 10 (worse possible) for the prior week giving the worst level of symptoms experienced during the preceding 7 days. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in symptoms.

For patients with Polycythemia Vera, queried symptoms included fever, itching/pruritus, bone pain and night sweats.

Baseline and Week 4 (Cycle 2, Day 1)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Essential Thrombocythemia Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4 (Cycle 2, Day 1)

Patients were asked to rate their symptoms on a scale of 0 (none) to 10 (worse possible) for the prior week giving the worst level of symptoms experienced during the preceding 7 days. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in symptoms.

For patients with essential thrombocythemia, queried symptoms included itching/pruritus, bone pain, night sweats, paresthesias (tingling or numbness), and weakness.

Baseline and Week 4 (Cycle 2, Day 1)
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4 (Cycle 2, Day 1)
Health-related Quality of Life was assessed using the Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). This scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.
Baseline and Week 4 (Cycle 2, Day 1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Albert Assad, MD, Incyte Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 20, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

July 31, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • INCB 18424-256
  • Ruxolitinib (Other Identifier: Incyte Corporation)
  • 2008-001382-28 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN)

Clinical Trials on Ruxolitinib

Subscribe