The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) (NMES)

January 23, 2013 updated by: University of Pittsburgh

The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) in Inducing Muscle Hypertrophy and Improvement in Muscle Torque Output Within the Quadriceps Muscle of Elderly People

The purpose of this project is to test the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) that produces 40 % of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) in increasing muscle size and improvement in muscle force output within the thigh muscle of elderly people.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Declines in whole skeletal muscle strength and size are features commonly associated with aging. Aging reduces the number of fibers in the whole muscle, which explains the loss of muscle mass. Frontera et al studied muscle strength, cross sectional area, and contractile properties of skinned parts of single fibers of the quadriceps muscle. He found that the strength and the whole muscle cross sectional area of knee extensors were significantly higher in young men compared to old subjects, but there were no differences between old and young subjects when the whole muscle strength was adjusted to the whole muscle cross sectional area (specific tension). He also found that muscle fibers from young men were stronger than muscle fibers from old men expressing the same myosin heavy chain isoform even after adjusting for size. Therefore they concluded that abnormality in the quantity and/or function of the contractile or regulatory proteins could explain the reduction in the ability of muscle fibers to generate force.

Along with the loss of muscle fibers, atrophy of the fibers also has been attributed to the aging process. This atrophy has been found to be selective to type II muscle fibers. Lexel et al found in a study done on the cross sections of the whole vastus lateralis muscle from 20 men (19-84 years of age) that the mean Cross Sectional Area (CSA) of type II fibers from muscles of older individuals was on average 35 % smaller while the mean CSA of type I was approximately 6 % smaller than that of young individuals.

Aging and muscles Maintaining muscle strength and size with aging has become a significant issue for elderly trying to keep up independent living and good quality of life. Several studies on old men and women have proven the effectiveness of the resistance exercises in reversing sarcopenia related problems . However in order to increase the size of type II muscle fibers we need to apply high intensity exercises (80 % of 1 RM), or by applying low resistance exercise that is very intense and is done with a large number of repetitions.

The use of electrical stimulation is well documented to improve quadriceps femoris muscle torque output. Numerous experiments have been done to characterize the pattern of activation of muscle fibers during electrically stimulated muscle contraction, and the results show that the recruitment of motor units during electrically induced muscle contraction is non selective. In other words, both type I and II fibers may have equal chance of being recruited during electrically induced muscle contraction. It has been found that NMES is more likely to activate type II muscle fibers at relatively low force levels compared to voluntary exercise. If this is found to be true, then we may have an alternative intervention to improve muscle strength and muscle hypertrophy for elderly individuals who could not perform high intensity exercises to achieve these same benefits. This alternative approach might result in improved overall physical function for these individuals.

The quadriceps muscle has been proposed to be treated because there is significant relationship between quadriceps muscle strength and dynamic stability during chair rise and gait at preferred speed in functionally limited elderly individuals

Methods This study is a two group, repeated measures, randomized clinical trial. Baseline measurements of quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area, type II muscle fiber cross-sectional area, quadriceps power output, the timed up and go test, the SPPB, stair climbing test and ramp up power test will be obtained from subjects prior to the interventions. Following the baseline assessments subjects will be randomly assigned to either the NMES group or the comparable isometric strengthening exercise group. A set of sequentially numbered envelopes will be created and a document indicating the intervention assignment will be placed in the sequentially numbered envelopes. Upon completion of the baseline assessment, the study coordinator will take the next envelope in the sequence and open the envelope. The study coordinator will assign the subject to a group based on the randomized group assignment information obtained from the sealed envelop. During the intervention period of the study subjects will receive either NMES or isometric strengthening exercise 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Each session will last from 15-30 minutes. Post training outcome measures will be taken at the end of the 12 week intervention period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15260
        • School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 80 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 65-80 years old, are walking independently without assistive devices.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as the following: 1) if not taking BP medication and resting systolic BP is greater than 140 or diastolic greater than 90, or 2) if taking BP medication and resting systolic BP greater than 160 or diastolic greater than 100).
  • History of cardiovascular disease
  • History of neurological disorders that effect lower extremity function (stroke, peripheral neuropathy, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis)
  • One cortico-steroid injection to the quadriceps or patellar tendon in the past month or 3 within the past year.
  • History of quadriceps tendon rupture, patellar tendon rupture, or patellar fracture, which could place them at risk of re-injury during quadriceps strength testing.
  • Current pain in the knee or in the thigh muscles.
  • Diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis (Rheumatoid arthritis, gout, or psoriatic arthritis)
  • Muscle diseases such as muscular dystrophy.
  • Currently been participating in a regular exercise program more than 1x/week.
  • Been using anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors
  • History of chronic and significant respiratory disease or shortness of breath
  • Visual impairments to the extent that they can not accurately see the monitor screen during training program.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
The group who will get neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)
neuromuscular electrical stimulation that produce 40% of the maximum voluntary contraction
Active Comparator: 2
The group who will do the voluntary muscle contraction
contracting the quadriceps muscle voluntarily to produce 40% of maximum voluntary contraction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cross sectional area of type II muscle fibers
Time Frame: Base line and 3 months follow up
Base line and 3 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quadriceps muscle power output
Time Frame: baseline and 3 month follow up
baseline and 3 month follow up
Functional performance
Time Frame: baseline and 3 month follow up
baseline and 3 month follow up
Quadriceps muscle cross sectional area
Time Frame: baseline and 3 month follow up
baseline and 3 month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

October 3, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NMES1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Fiber Atrophy, Type II

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Subscribe