Reliability of Cardiac Troponins for the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Skeletal Muscle Disease (H&M)

December 7, 2022 updated by: Christian Müller, MD

Heart&Muscle Study

Visits to the emergency department (ED) for chest pain are extremely common and require a safe, rapid and efficacious treatment algorithm to exclude a possible AMI. These diagnostic algorithms are partly based on an important laboratory value, which showed growing utility in the diagnostic and prognostic of many cardiovascular diseases in the last years : cardiac troponin.

However, some patients with muscle disease often present with unexplained elevated high-sensitive cardiac Troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels in the absence of cardiac disease. The investigators aim at the characterization of the behaviour of this biomarker and its alternative (high-sensitive cardiac Troponin I), which will have important clinical implications on patients management.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction: The detection of cardiomyocyte injury as quantified by blood concentrations of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) or I (cTnI) is central in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). While multiple cardiac disorders other than AMI may also lead to cardiomyocyte injury and therefore elevations in cTnT and cTnI, latest generations of cTnT and cTnI assays are considered to have near exclusive cardiac-specificity. Overall, both analytes (cTnT and cTnI) seem to have comparable diagnostic accuracy among patients presenting with suspected AMI to the emergency department (ED). However, their use in the diagnosis of AMI in patients with a skeletal muscle disease is questioned, as especially cTnT was found to be elevated in this setting. These increased cTnT levels have been successively attributed to a possible re-expression of cTnT isoforms in the diseased muscle, to a primary cardiac involvement associated with the muscle disease or to a cross-reaction of the hs-cTnT assay with TnT of muscle origin.

Aim: To characterize cTn levels in patients with a skeletal muscle disease to assess their utility in the field of cardiology (through their implication in AMI diagnosis and their diagnostic and prognostic accuracy regarding a possible cardiac involvement) and in the field of neurology (for the detection and risk-stratification of the muscle disorder itself).

Methodology: This study will be conducted at the University Hospital of Basel, at the Kantonsspital Aarau, both in Switzerland, and at the University Hospital of Innsbruck, Austria. A prospective cohort patient will be recruited through the neurology, rheumatology and cardiology clinics of these three hospitals. This prospective cohort of patients presenting with skeletal muscle disease will allow us to systematically screen patients for cTn increases, to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of a possible primary cardiac involvement (as documented by electrocardiogram, echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, cTnI, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide) and any available further cardiac testing) and to explore the origins of the elevated cTn levels using muscle biopsies. Furthermore, this prospective cohort will document the role of these biomarkers in the diagnosis, prognosis and risk-stratification of the muscle disease. Patients will receive a 1- and 3-year follow-up visit with blood draw in order to measure cTn and other biomarkers and record the impact of the evolution and treatment of the muscle disease on these levels. Major adverse cardiac events including cardiovascular death, AMI, hospitalization for heart failure, and the development of clinical or subclinical heart failure as quantified by elevated blood concentrations of NT-proBNP will be recorded during follow-up.

Potential significance: Elevated cTnT levels do not only have consequences regarding the diagnosis of AMI but also raise many questions regarding their possible use as a diagnostic, prognostic and risk-stratification marker regarding the different muscle injuries and their possible primary cardiac involvement.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University Innsbruck
        • Contact:
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4056
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Recruiting
        • Inselspital Bern
        • Contact:
          • Britta Maurer
      • Zürich, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Zurich
    • Aargau
      • Aarau, Aargau, Switzerland, 5001
        • Recruiting
        • Canton Hospital of Aarau
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive participants which have been or currently are in treatment for a muscle disease at the University hospital of Basel, at the Canton Hospital of Aarau, University Hospital of Zürich or Bern or at the Medical University of Innsbruck, or who received a new diagnosis/suspicion of such a disease will be included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnostic or suspicion of muscle disease as presence of specified keyword in patient's file or as screened by colleagues of the rheumatology, neuromuscular or other medical clinics.
  • Patient consent available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal
  • Age <18 years old
  • Terminal kidney insufficiency with need for dialysis.
  • Temporary exclusion criteria : Acute health condition such as myocardial infarction, patients presenting with a major trauma, a sepsis, patients shortly after cardiac surgery, and patients in shock (>100 bpm, <90 systolic BP, evidence of organ dysfunction).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Comparison of cTnT and cTnI levels as measured by different hs-cTn assays in patients with skeletal muscle disease.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of levels of cTnT and cTnI as measured by hs-assays in matched patients with and without skeletal muscle disease.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Regression model of diverse patients' characteristics on levels of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT in the context of skeletal muscle disease versus no skeletal muscle disease.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Prognostic value of hs-cTn levels in patients with and without skeletal muscle disease.
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Characterization of cTnT and cTnI on skeletal muscle biopsies from myopathic patients.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Characterization of the impact of cTnT and cTnI on the diagnosis and prognosis of muscle diseases
Time Frame: 3 years
Prognosis defined as the incidence of Major Cardiovascular Events (MACE is defined as a composite of death, acute myocardial infarction, life-threatening arrhythmia (cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular (AV) -block III), cardiac arrest/reanimation, acute heart failure (requiring admission to a hospital or intra-hospital transfer to the intensive care unit), stroke/transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism)
3 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Research on the development of a new cTnT-assay
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Protein characterization
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Cardiac troponin as predictors or screening tools for a cardiac involvement
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Cardiac troponin as predictor of evolution and therapeutic response of the muscle disease or muscle regeneration.
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Characterisation of cardiac troponin in diseases of various etiologies involving muscles
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Impact of muscle symptoms on cardiac troponin
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Cardiac troponin versus other markers (e.g. CK) of inflammation/necrosis of peripheral muscles.
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christian Mueller, MD, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
  • Principal Investigator: Angelika Hammerer, MD, Canton Hospital Aarau
  • Principal Investigator: Julia Wanschitz, MD, Medical University Innsbruck

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Weakness

3
Subscribe