Ketotifen/Naphazoline Ophthalmic Solution in the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model of Allergic Conjunctivitis.

March 13, 2024 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Vehicle and Active Controlled Evaluation of the Onset and Duration of Action of KetoNaph Ophthalmic Solution in the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model of Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and efficacy of ketotifen/naphazoline ophthalmic solution compared to vehicle and its individual components in alleviating the signs and symptoms of conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC)-induced allergic conjunctivitis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • North Andover, Massachusetts, United States, 01845
        • Ophthalmic Research Consultants, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Positive history of ocular allergies and positive skin test reaction to cat hair, cat dander, grasses, ragweed, and/or trees within the past 24 months.
  • Calculated best-corrected visual acuity of 0.7 logMAR or better in each eye as measured using the ETDRS chart.
  • Positive bilateral conjunctival allergen challenge(CAC)reaction within 10 minutes of instillation of the last titration of allergen at visit 1.
  • Positive bilateral CAC reaction in at least 2 out of 3 time points at visit 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known contraindications or sensitivities to the study medication or its components.
  • Any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subjects safety or trial parameters.
  • Use of disallowed medications during the period indicated prior to study enrollment or during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: KetoNaph
KetoNaph (ketotifen fumarate 0.025%, naphazoline HCl 0.05%) ophthalmic solution
One drop of ketotifen/naphazoline in study eye at visit 3 and visit 4.
Active Comparator: Naphazoline
Naphazoline HCl 0.05% ophthalmic solution
One drop of naphazoline in study eye at vist 3 and visit 4.
Active Comparator: Ketotifen
Ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution
One drop of Ketotifen in study eye at visit 3 and visit 4.
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle
Vehicle of KetoNaph ophthalmic solution
One drop of vehicle in study eye at visit 3 and visit 4.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ocular Itching
Time Frame: 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Ocular itching was evaluated by the participant at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge. Assessments were made using a 0-4 numerical analog scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments (but disallowing 0.25-unit increments), where: 0.0 = None and 4.0 = Incapacitating itch with an irresistible urge to rub.
3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Conjunctival Hyperemia
Time Frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Conjunctival hyperemia was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Assessments were completed using a 0-4 numerical analog scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments, where: 0.0 = None and 4.0 = Extremely severe.
7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ciliary Redness
Time Frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Ciliary hyperemia (redness) was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Assessments were made using a 0-4 scale, allowing 0.5- unit increments, with 0.0 = None and 4.0 = Extremely severe.
7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Episcleral Redness
Time Frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Episcleral hyperemia (redness) was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Assessments were made using a 0-4 scale, allowing 0.5- unit increments, with 0.0 = None and 4.0 = Extremely severe.
7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Chemosis
Time Frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Chemosis was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on a 0-4 numerical analog scale, allowing 0.5-unit increments, where: 0.0 = None and 4.0 = Extremely severe.
7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Eyelid Swelling
Time Frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Lid swelling was evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on a 0- 3 numerical analog scale, with 0.5-unit increments disallowed, where: 0.0 = None and 3.0 = Severe.
7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Percentage of Eyes With Tearing
Time Frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Tearing was evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge (absent or present). Tearing was recorded as either absent or present.
7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Percentage of Eyes With Ocular Mucus Drainage
Time Frame: 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days
Ocular mucous discharge was evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge. Mucous discharged was recorded as either absent or present.
7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge at 14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

October 9, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Allergic Conjunctivitis

Clinical Trials on Ketotifen/naphazoline

Subscribe